Player 48-Minute Production by Position
| Position |
FGA |
eFG% |
FTA |
iFG |
Reb |
Ast |
T/O |
Blk |
PF |
Pts |
PER* |
| PG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SF |
12.8 |
0.125 |
0.0 |
37% |
6.4 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
6.4 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
| PF |
12.5 |
0.468 |
3.3 |
44% |
10.1 |
0.9 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
5.9 |
13.2 |
11.1 |
| C |
8.4 |
0.200 |
2.3 |
40% |
8.4 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
2.8 |
11.3 |
5.1 |
2.2 |
Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production
| Position |
FGA |
eFG% |
FTA |
iFG |
Reb |
Ast |
T/O |
Blk |
PF |
Pts |
PER* |
| PG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SF |
19.1 |
0.458 |
4.8 |
16% |
8.0 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
1.6 |
22.3 |
16.9 |
| PF |
17.7 |
0.500 |
5.4 |
31% |
10.8 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
1.5 |
4.1 |
21.4 |
18.1 |
| C |
6.2 |
0.273 |
6.2 |
36% |
10.7 |
1.7 |
2.3 |
4.5 |
8.4 |
6.2 |
5.3 |
Net 48-Minute Production by Position
| Position |
FGA |
eFG% |
FTA |
iFG |
Reb |
Ast |
T/O |
Blk |
PF |
Pts |
PER* |
| PG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SF |
-6.4 |
-0.333 |
-4.8 |
+21% |
-1.6 |
-1.6 |
+0.0 |
+1.6 |
-4.8 |
-19.1 |
-16.9 |
| PF |
-5.2 |
-0.032 |
-2.1 |
+13% |
-0.7 |
-2.5 |
+1.0 |
+0.5 |
-1.7 |
-8.2 |
-7.0 |
| C |
+2.3 |
-0.073 |
-3.9 |
+4% |
-2.3 |
+0.0 |
+1.1 |
-1.7 |
-2.8 |
-1.1 |
-3.1 |
Notes: the PER is a complicated single number rating developed by
John Hollinger
and used extensively in his excellent Pro Basketball Prospectus books.
The league average PER is set to 15, but for this view the comparison between
a player's production and the opponent production at the position is the focus.
At a glance you can tell whether there has been a net positive or negative
overall contribution while playing that position.
eFG% is the effective field goal percentage, adjusted
for three point shots,
while iFG represents the percentage of shots taken from inside/close
to the hoop.
