Tyson Chandler of the Charlotte Bobcats, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Tyson Chandler
Charlotte Bobcats
2009-2010 NBA Season

More Tyson Chandler stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
29%	-18	1.02	1.03	-0.7	29	20	59.2

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.1 3.7 .574 .574 61% 13% 2.3 6.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 13% .160   75% 24% 0.2

Close 36% .435   63% 20% 1.2

Dunk 35% .848   79% 6% 2.2

Tips 16% .633   0% 0% 0.7

Inside 87% .636   60% 11% 4.1

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 48% .641   32% 11% 2.3

11-15 22% .500   95% 14% 0.8

16-20 20% .579   95% 13% 0.9

21+ 9% .389   86% 17% 0.3

Crunch 29% .518   93% 14% 1.1

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
115	157	73.2	6.5	4.8	254	64	25.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	9	5	1	16	21	0.8	-0.7	0.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
114	1084	10.5%	33.1%	206	1076	19.1%	72.3%	29.7	105.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
12	43	2	1%	8%	2%	57	2.4	3.1%	58	0.98	8.4

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
36	21	15	19	0.7

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Felton-Jackson-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	340	1.05	1.02	33	17	12	58
2	Felton-Bell-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	77	1.06	.94	19	4	0	100
3	Felton-Murray-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	36	.95	1.19	-15	3	2	60
4	Felton-Graham-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	34	.85	.83	-1	4	2	66
5	Felton-Graham-Jackson-Diaw-Chandler	34	1.04	.99	2	5	3	62
6	Felton-Hughes-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	30	.88	1.11	-10	2	4	33
7	Augustin-Hughes-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	24	1.31	.96	14	4	1	80
8	Augustin-Hughes-Wallace-Thomas-Chandler	23	.94	1.17	-10	1	5	16
9	Augustin-Jackson-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	21	1.15	1.06	3	5	5	50
10	Felton-Hughes-Jackson-Diaw-Chandler	20	1.17	1.26	-3	3	1	75
11	Augustin-Felton-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	19	1.08	.80	11	2	0	100
12	Augustin-Jackson-Wallace-Thomas-Chandler	18	.86	1.27	-18	1	5	16
13	Murray-Jackson-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	17	.87	.92	-1	2	2	50
14	Felton-Jackson-Brown-Wallace-Chandler	17	1.13	.68	16	3	1	75
15	Augustin-Graham-Jackson-Thomas-Chandler	17	.83	1.10	-9	2	4	33
16	Augustin-Henderson-Jackson-Thomas-Chandler	16	.73	1.25	-13	2	3	40
17	Augustin-Felton-Henderson-Thomas-Chandler	13	1.02	1.03	-4	2	1	66
18	Augustin-Henderson-Wallace-Thomas-Chandler	12	1.13	1.26	-7	0	3	0
19	Augustin-Felton-Henderson-Diaw-Chandler	12	1.10	1.10	1	1	1	50
20	Augustin-Graham-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler	12	.94	1.26	-6	2	1	66

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Felton-Jackson-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .486 .453 +17 44% 35%   51% -3%

2 Felton-Bell-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .400 .462 -6 43% 32%   61% +3%

3 Felton-Murray-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .423 .547 +1 42% 28%   54% -8%

4 Felton-Graham-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .378 .397 +11 36% 41%   62% -20%

5 Felton-Graham-Jackson-Diaw-Chandler .529 .490 -3 41% 45%   52% -2%

6 Felton-Hughes-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .362 .439 +7 36% 37%   42% -5%

7 Augustin-Hughes-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .571 .459 +3 37% 24%   54% -1%

8 Augustin-Hughes-Wallace-Thomas-Chandler .333 .463 +7 46% 34%   55% -5%

9 Augustin-Jackson-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .417 .452 +11 13% 26%   50% -3%

10 Felton-Hughes-Jackson-Diaw-Chandler .462 .559 -1 46% 44%   56% 0%

11 Augustin-Felton-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .538 .364 +10 54% 45%   52% -5%

12 Augustin-Jackson-Wallace-Thomas-Chandler .419 .576 -1 55% 18%   54% -11%

13 Murray-Jackson-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .375 .276 +1 42% 28%   52% -9%

14 Felton-Jackson-Brown-Wallace-Chandler .556 .417 +10 48% 25%   49% +22%

15 Augustin-Graham-Jackson-Thomas-Chandler .321 .429 +2 43% 25%   60% -11%

16 Augustin-Henderson-Jackson-Thomas-Chandler .318 .440 -2 41% 24%   51% -14%

17 Augustin-Felton-Henderson-Thomas-Chandler .360 .375 -1 48% 25%   59% +3%

18 Augustin-Henderson-Wallace-Thomas-Chandler .524 .583 +2 48% 33%   52% -1%

19 Augustin-Felton-Henderson-Diaw-Chandler .450 .421 -5 30% 16%   57% -15%

20 Augustin-Graham-Wallace-Diaw-Chandler .400 .550 +3 27% 25%   50% -19%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	29%	-18	90.7	91.5	-.7	29	20	59%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	7.8	.574	6.5	86%	13.2	.7	3.8	2.4	5.6	13.8	14.2

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 13.1 .541 5.0 58% 12.8 2.7 2.6 2.9 5.7 17.4 18.2

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C -5.2 .033 1.5 28% .4 -2.1 -1.2 -.5 .1 -3.6 -4.0

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
25%	-23	71.3	91.5	-20.2	4	8	33.3%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 3.5 5.3 .667 .667 50% 0% 7.0 14.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 67% .750   67% 0% 0.4

Tips 33% .500   0% 0% 0.1

Inside 100% .667   50% 0% 0.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 83% .600   33% 0% 0.4

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 17% 1.000   100% 0% 0.1

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 33% .500   50% 0% 0.1

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
8	10	80.0	8.8	7.0	9	3	33.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	-1.8	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
7	62	11.3%	43.5%	2	51	3.9%	64.7%	15.2	108.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	1	0	0%	7%	0%	1	0.9	1.4%	2	0.50	4.7

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	1	0	1.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1162	2813	29%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	102.9	107.7	-4.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	103.0	104.5	-1.5
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-0.1	+3.2	-3.3
Points Scored	2197	5616	-3419
Points Allowed	2215	5478	-3263
Net Points	-18	+138	-156
Effective FG%	47.7%	49.5%	-1.8%
Effective FG% Allowed	49.7%	48.9%	+0.7%
Assisted Field Goals	54%	59%	-5%
Assisted FG% Allowed	59%	56%	+3%
Own Shots Blocked	9%	7%	+2%
Shots Blocked	6%	6%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	33.1%	29.4%	+3.7%
Defensive Rebounding	72.3%	70.8%	+1.5%
Total Rebounding	52.7%	50.1%	+2.6%
Stats
Free Throws Made	19	19	+0
Free Throws Attempted	26	26	+0
Free Throws Made by Opp.	14	15	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	19	21	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	17	14	-3
Turnovers, on Defense	15	15	+0
Net Turnovers	-2	1	+3
Fouls Committed	19	19	+0
Fouls, Drawn	22	21	+1
Net Fouls	3	2	-1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts