Eduardo Najera of the Dallas Mavericks, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Eduardo Najera
Dallas Mavericks
2009-2010 NBA Season

More Eduardo Najera stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
12%	+37	1.10	1.05	3.7	18	13	58.1

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.3 2.8 .457 .543 86% 4% 0.2 3.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 63% .500   95% 0% 1.8

Close 32% .586   82% 14% 1.0

Dunk 3% .667   100% 0% 0.1

Tips 2% 1.000   0% 0% 0.1

Inside 37% .618   76% 12% 1.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 37% .574   65% 9% 1.2

11-15 27% .540   100% 0% 0.8

16-20 21% .605   100% 5% 0.7

21+ 15% .393   100% 0% 0.3

Crunch 36% .515   100% 3% 1.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
8	12	66.7	1.2	0.8	97	5	5.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
6	4	3	1	14	5	2.8	1.0	1.4

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
21	479	4.4%	23.2%	55	438	12.6%	70.5%	16.9	93.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
2	10	0	0%	5%	0%	12	1.2	1.5%	27	0.44	4.1

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
5	5	3	0	7.6

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Barea-Terry-Butler-Nowitzki-Najera	33	1.12	1.01	12	6	3	66
2	Kidd-Terry-Butler-Nowitzki-Najera	28	1.12	1.13	7	5	5	50
3	Kidd-Terry-Marion-Najera-Haywood	25	1.21	.82	17	6	3	66
4	Kidd-Terry-Marion-Nowitzki-Najera	24	.67	.97	-15	1	4	20
5	Barea-Kidd-Butler-Marion-Najera	18	1.62	.88	24	3	0	100
6	Barea-Terry-Stevenson-Nowitzki-Najera	18	1.08	.95	4	1	3	25
7	Barea-Beaubois-Stevenson-Nowitzki-Najera	17	.91	1.40	-20	0	3	0
8	Kidd-Terry-Butler-Marion-Najera	14	1.01	1.28	-11	2	4	33
9	Barea-Kidd-Butler-Nowitzki-Najera	13	1.15	.94	8	2	2	50
10	Kidd-Terry-Butler-Najera-Haywood	12	1.12	.96	7	3	2	60
11	Beaubois-Terry-Marion-Nowitzki-Najera	12	.97	1.19	-2	1	2	33
12	Beaubois-Kidd-Butler-Marion-Najera	10	.93	1.39	-11	1	2	33
13	Barea-Terry-Marion-Nowitzki-Najera	10	.79	.68	4	2	1	66
14	Kidd-Terry-Marion-Najera-Dampier	10	1.31	1.45	1	1	2	33
15	Barea-Terry-Stevenson-Najera-Haywood	9	1.45	1.07	3	2	1	66
16	Barea-Terry-Butler-Najera-Haywood	9	.76	1.01	-7	0	2	0
17	Barea-Beaubois-Stevenson-Carroll-Najera	9	.55	1.57	-19	0	2	0
18	Beaubois-Terry-Butler-Nowitzki-Najera	8	1.15	.68	9	2	0	100
19	Barea-Stevenson-Carroll-Najera-Haywood	8	.67	1.29	-11	0	1	0
20	Kidd-Butler-Marion-Nowitzki-Najera	8	1.16	.75	8	3	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Barea-Terry-Butler-Nowitzki-Najera .518 .476 -7 32% 38%   35% +21%

2 Kidd-Terry-Butler-Nowitzki-Najera .446 .477 -3 25% 30%   56% 0%

3 Kidd-Terry-Marion-Najera-Haywood .542 .409 -2 48% 16%   56% +8%

4 Kidd-Terry-Marion-Nowitzki-Najera .308 .528 -1 26% 31%   39% +12%

5 Barea-Kidd-Butler-Marion-Najera .590 .394 +1 26% 45%   43% +35%

6 Barea-Terry-Stevenson-Nowitzki-Najera .448 .355 -1 34% 45%   43% +6%

7 Barea-Beaubois-Stevenson-Nowitzki-Najera .433 .710 -4 23% 48%   46% -1%

8 Kidd-Terry-Butler-Marion-Najera .296 .650 -1 26% 40%   53% +16%

9 Barea-Kidd-Butler-Nowitzki-Najera .545 .400 0 23% 15%   38% +12%

10 Kidd-Terry-Butler-Najera-Haywood .381 .409 +6 43% 23%   50% -5%

11 Beaubois-Terry-Marion-Nowitzki-Najera .458 .526 -8 29% 47%   39% -1%

12 Beaubois-Kidd-Butler-Marion-Najera .429 .571 -6 14% 29%   40% -4%

13 Barea-Terry-Marion-Nowitzki-Najera .368 .353 +1 11% 24%   49% +3%

14 Kidd-Terry-Marion-Najera-Dampier .409 .563 +1 32% 38%   72% -16%

15 Barea-Terry-Stevenson-Najera-Haywood .583 .533 +2 17% 40%   25% +25%

16 Barea-Terry-Butler-Najera-Haywood .235 .474 +3 47% 32%   54% -2%

17 Barea-Beaubois-Stevenson-Carroll-Najera .188 .500 -5 6% 11%   32% -10%

18 Beaubois-Terry-Butler-Nowitzki-Najera .467 .286 +1 13% 7%   40% +17%

19 Barea-Stevenson-Carroll-Najera-Haywood .333 .571 -1 17% 14%   33% +5%

20 Kidd-Butler-Marion-Nowitzki-Najera .529 .353 +2 12% 29%   43% +15%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	3%	+12	101.4	97.2	4.2	12	8	60%
C	8%	+25	103.5	100.1	3.5	13	14	48%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	12.2	.457	.3	28%	8.4	1.4	1.0	.7	4.9	11.5	11.2
C	7.9	.596	1.5	42%	7.2	1.4	1.4	1.4	6.5	10.5	9.9

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 15.7 .489 10.1 28% 11.2 3.5 1.7 .3 4.9 23.1 23.5

C 12.1 .534 5.6 52% 15.2 3.1 3.2 1.8 4.6 17.3 19.1

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -3.5 -.032 -9.8 0% -2.8 -2.1 .7 .3 .0 -11.5 -12.4

C -4.2 .062 -4.0 -10% -7.9 -1.7 1.8 -.4 -2.0 -6.8 -9.2

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
1%	-4	112.2	187.0	-74.8	1	1	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 18.7 18.7 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	18.7	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	1	0	1	0	1.0	0.0	18.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	3	0.0%	0.0%	0	2	0.0%	100.0%	0.0	100.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	0.5

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	481	3494	12%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.4	110.4	-1.0
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.0	107.1	-1.1
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+3.4	+3.4	+0.0
Points Scored	1033	7331	-6298
Points Allowed	996	7145	-6149
Net Points	+37	+186	-149
Effective FG%	51.4%	50.5%	+0.9%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.4%	49.4%	+1.0%
Assisted Field Goals	59%	61%	-2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	54%	53%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	5%	-1%
Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	23.2%	27.0%	-3.8%
Defensive Rebounding	70.5%	71.0%	-0.5%
Total Rebounding	46.9%	49.0%	-2.1%
Stats
Free Throws Made	14	18	-4
Free Throws Attempted	18	23	-5
Free Throws Made by Opp.	19	16	-3
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	24	21	-3
Turnovers, on Offense	11	12	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	17	14	+3
Net Turnovers	6	2	-4
Fouls Committed	19	18	-1
Fouls, Drawn	17	20	-3
Net Fouls	-2	2	+4

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts