Zach Randolph of the Memphis Grizzlies, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Zach Randolph
Memphis Grizzlies
2009-2010 NBA Season

More Zach Randolph stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
76%	+17	1.10	1.11	0.3	37	41	47.4

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 8.0 16.5 .488 .494 48% 9% 4.5 20.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 51% .414   47% 4% 7.0

Close 42% .579   55% 17% 8.0

Dunk 0% 1.000   100% 0% 0.1

Tips 7% .556   0% 1% 1.2

Inside 49% .578   48% 14% 9.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 40% .553   42% 10% 7.3

11-15 23% .475   57% 9% 3.5

16-20 24% .497   49% 8% 3.9

21+ 13% .339   50% 9% 1.5

Crunch 37% .441   50% 8% 5.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
362	465	77.8	7.3	5.7	1543	207	13.4%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
42	21	67	18	148	52	2.8	2.6	2.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
330	2954	11.2%	34.4%	621	2782	22.3%	72.5%	33.5	106.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
5	29	0	0%	2%	0%	34	0.5	0.7%	96	0.35	1.8

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
33	52	71	18	10.2

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	1473	1.15	1.08	225	42	23	64
2	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet	260	1.02	1.11	-47	12	17	41
3	Tinsley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	80	1.14	1.07	9	7	7	50
4	Williams-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	67	.94	1.01	-9	8	8	50
5	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Arthur-Randolph	60	1.18	1.04	16	5	8	38
6	Conley-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Gasol	58	1.05	1.13	-12	7	12	36
7	Conley-Young-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	55	1.07	.96	5	8	10	44
8	Conley-Mayo-Young-Gay-Randolph	44	1.04	1.30	-17	4	7	36
9	Tinsley-Young-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet	41	1.24	1.16	11	6	7	46
10	Williams-Young-Gay-Arthur-Randolph	40	1.16	1.22	-8	6	8	42
11	Tinsley-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Thabeet	40	1.01	1.17	-5	7	9	43
12	Conley-Mayo-Carroll-Randolph-Gasol	40	1.13	1.09	-2	4	4	50
13	Conley-Mayo-Carroll-Gay-Randolph	37	1.03	1.22	-28	5	10	33
14	Tinsley-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Gasol	29	.90	1.38	-26	1	8	11
15	Conley-Young-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet	27	1.18	.93	15	4	5	44
16	Tinsley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet	25	1.12	.99	8	8	6	57
17	Williams-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Haddadi	24	1.23	1.13	7	4	3	57
18	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Haddadi	24	.92	1.06	-4	5	4	55
19	Williams-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Gasol	24	1.02	1.46	-17	5	8	38
20	Williams-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet	23	.79	1.16	-24	3	9	25

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .492 .487 +224 41% 37%   53% +1%

2 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet .443 .487 -4 35% 34%   53% 0%

3 Tinsley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .507 .496 -18 42% 44%   58% -3%

4 Williams-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .429 .439 -13 45% 36%   59% -5%

5 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Arthur-Randolph .500 .449 +3 36% 36%   59% -3%

6 Conley-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Gasol .412 .521 +11 51% 32%   54% -1%

7 Conley-Young-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .471 .449 +11 48% 36%   52% +5%

8 Conley-Mayo-Young-Gay-Randolph .472 .561 +13 49% 40%   49% -8%

9 Tinsley-Young-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet .513 .431 0 43% 25%   61% -8%

10 Williams-Young-Gay-Arthur-Randolph .500 .493 -2 29% 38%   54% -5%

11 Tinsley-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Thabeet .437 .403 +12 31% 34%   43% +3%

12 Conley-Mayo-Carroll-Randolph-Gasol .542 .479 -12 51% 35%   50% +1%

13 Conley-Mayo-Carroll-Gay-Randolph .400 .552 -9 46% 39%   61% -5%

14 Tinsley-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Gasol .435 .620 +7 33% 42%   54% -13%

15 Conley-Young-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet .477 .426 +15 34% 49%   50% +6%

16 Tinsley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet .451 .488 +3 37% 35%   55% +2%

17 Williams-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Haddadi .532 .526 -2 45% 34%   56% +5%

18 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Haddadi .400 .432 -6 46% 39%   55% -5%

19 Williams-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Gasol .421 .537 +2 39% 39%   46% -8%

20 Williams-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet .372 .489 -7 42% 40%   55% -11%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	66%	+72	102.3	101.0	1.3	38	41	48%
C	10%	-57	106.6	113.3	-6.7	21	32	39%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	20.9	.498	6.9	47%	14.8	2.5	2.7	.6	3.5	26.1	23.5
C	22.2	.465	10.4	54%	16.2	1.2	3.2	.4	4.1	28.6	24.3

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 16.2 .515 3.9 35% 9.9 3.2 2.3 1.8 5.7 19.5 16.9

C 15.5 .565 5.1 57% 11.8 2.5 1.5 2.7 7.1 21.6 21.7

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 4.6 -.016 3.0 12% 4.9 -.7 -.4 -1.2 2.2 6.6 6.6

C 6.7 -.100 5.2 -3% 4.4 -1.3 -1.7 -2.4 3.1 7.0 2.5

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
96%	+1	95.6	95.3	0.2	22	17	56.4%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 8.5 17.7 .479 .486 41% 10% 11.4 28.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 41% .328   56% 3% 0.4

Close 42% .567   53% 20% 0.8

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 17% .667   0% 0% 0.4

Inside 59% .595   36% 14% 1.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 44% .516   25% 6% 0.7

11-15 14% .400   50% 10% 0.2

16-20 25% .389   43% 17% 0.3

21+ 17% .625   71% 8% 0.3

Crunch 42% .483   57% 13% 0.7

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
46	52	88.5	12.9	11.4	89	18	20.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
2	1	5	0	8	4	2.0	1.2	2.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
30	214	14.0%	38.3%	45	208	21.6%	65.9%	35.7	104.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	2	0	0%	2%	0%	2	0.5	0.6%	9	0.22	1.9

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	4	4	1	9.3

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	3050	930	76%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.3	104.3	+7.0
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.4	109.5	+2.0
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-0.1	-5.2	+5.0
Points Scored	6537	1867	+4670
Points Allowed	6520	2008	+4512
Net Points	+17	-141	+158
Effective FG%	50.2%	46.7%	+3.5%
Effective FG% Allowed	53.0%	49.1%	+3.8%
Assisted Field Goals	47%	48%	-1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	58%	52%	+6%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	7%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	34.4%	34.5%	-0.2%
Defensive Rebounding	72.5%	67.6%	+4.8%
Total Rebounding	53.4%	51.1%	+2.3%
Stats
Free Throws Made	19	19	+0
Free Throws Attempted	25	28	-3
Free Throws Made by Opp.	16	19	+3
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	21	25	+4
Turnovers, on Offense	14	15	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	14	14	+0
Net Turnovers	0	-1	-1
Fouls Committed	19	21	+2
Fouls, Drawn	21	24	-3
Net Fouls	2	3	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts