Deron Williams of the Utah Jazz, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Deron Williams
Utah Jazz
2009-2010 NBA Season

More Deron Williams stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
70%	+428	1.13	1.06	7.3	50	23	68.5

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 6.5 13.9 .469 .515 47% 6% 4.4 18.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 69% .473   53% 3% 9.1

Close 28% .601   38% 14% 4.7

Dunk 2% .833   40% 11% 0.4

Tips 1% .429   0% 0% 0.1

Inside 31% .610   38% 14% 5.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 37% .500   32% 9% 5.1

11-15 27% .564   55% 5% 4.2

16-20 22% .506   57% 4% 3.1

21+ 14% .474   54% 3% 1.9

Crunch 36% .493   56% 3% 5.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
335	418	80.1	7.2	5.7	1220	167	13.7%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
154	261	285	99	799	146	5.5	18.7	13.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
50	2512	2.0%	28.9%	253	2698	9.4%	72.3%	11.4	101.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	12	0	0%	1%	0%	16	0.3	0.3%	94	0.17	0.9

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
22	146	84	0	33.7

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Williams-Brewer-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur	327	1.11	1.07	28	13	12	52
2	Williams-Matthews-Brewer-Boozer-Okur	241	1.14	1.16	-6	10	10	50
3	Williams-Matthews-Miles-Boozer-Okur	204	1.16	1.07	39	11	8	57
4	Williams-Matthews-Miles-Millsap-Boozer	147	1.19	1.18	7	19	13	59
5	Williams-Matthews-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur	141	1.03	1.21	-57	2	11	15
6	Williams-Brewer-Miles-Boozer-Okur	136	.99	1.00	-2	4	9	30
7	Williams-Brewer-Kirilenko-Millsap-Boozer	117	1.19	1.07	25	12	7	63
8	Williams-Matthews-Kirilenko-Millsap-Boozer	110	1.14	.95	33	15	11	57
9	Williams-Matthews-Korver-Millsap-Boozer	109	1.21	1.11	27	12	10	54
10	Williams-Brewer-Kirilenko-Millsap-Okur	84	1.08	1.07	7	8	7	53
11	Williams-Matthews-Brewer-Millsap-Boozer	73	1.05	1.06	-2	8	11	42
12	Williams-Korver-Kirilenko-Millsap-Boozer	60	1.32	1.19	13	7	7	50
13	Williams-Matthews-Brewer-Boozer-Fesenko	58	1.29	.98	32	6	2	75
14	Williams-Korver-Miles-Millsap-Okur	54	1.34	1.09	21	10	5	66
15	Williams-Korver-Miles-Millsap-Boozer	52	1.31	1.11	18	10	7	58
16	Williams-Matthews-Kirilenko-Millsap-Okur	42	1.16	.88	29	12	4	75
17	Williams-Matthews-Brewer-Millsap-Okur	42	1.11	1.17	-10	5	7	41
18	Williams-Matthews-Miles-Millsap-Okur	38	1.01	.99	2	7	7	50
19	Williams-Brewer-Miles-Millsap-Boozer	37	1.07	1.12	0	3	4	42
20	Williams-Korver-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur	34	1.15	.99	19	5	2	71

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Williams-Brewer-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .519 .482 +30 43% 40%   49% +1%

2 Williams-Matthews-Brewer-Boozer-Okur .522 .547 -5 36% 33%   51% +1%

3 Williams-Matthews-Miles-Boozer-Okur .529 .450 -1 43% 36%   49% -5%

4 Williams-Matthews-Miles-Millsap-Boozer .515 .467 -2 44% 31%   49% -1%

5 Williams-Matthews-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .427 .517 +14 48% 42%   50% -1%

6 Williams-Brewer-Miles-Boozer-Okur .433 .468 -35 41% 41%   53% 0%

7 Williams-Brewer-Kirilenko-Millsap-Boozer .551 .426 +4 44% 45%   50% -2%

8 Williams-Matthews-Kirilenko-Millsap-Boozer .449 .422 +22 42% 37%   54% +5%

9 Williams-Matthews-Korver-Millsap-Boozer .505 .491 +1 38% 35%   54% +1%

10 Williams-Brewer-Kirilenko-Millsap-Okur .527 .431 +15 34% 33%   48% -7%

11 Williams-Matthews-Brewer-Millsap-Boozer .482 .451 +8 38% 34%   45% +1%

12 Williams-Korver-Kirilenko-Millsap-Boozer .535 .442 0 43% 35%   51% +1%

13 Williams-Matthews-Brewer-Boozer-Fesenko .582 .394 +4 52% 33%   46% +4%

14 Williams-Korver-Miles-Millsap-Okur .575 .474 +15 37% 29%   56% 0%

15 Williams-Korver-Miles-Millsap-Boozer .534 .500 -12 34% 39%   55% +4%

16 Williams-Matthews-Kirilenko-Millsap-Okur .521 .371 +9 44% 24%   59% -4%

17 Williams-Matthews-Brewer-Millsap-Okur .500 .481 +7 38% 21%   45% -1%

18 Williams-Matthews-Miles-Millsap-Okur .381 .429 0 27% 35%   56% -7%

19 Williams-Brewer-Miles-Millsap-Boozer .507 .509 -6 39% 32%   51% +7%

20 Williams-Korver-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .547 .429 -6 34% 36%   48% +2%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	70%	+428	107.0	99.7	7.3	50	23	68%
SG
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	18.0	.515	7.2	30%	5.2	13.7	4.3	.3	3.6	24.3	23.0
SG
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 17.2 .471 5.3 33% 4.2 7.7 3.8 .3 4.8 20.4 15.0

SG

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG .9 .044 1.8 -3% 1.0 6.0 -.5 -.1 1.2 3.9 8.0

SG

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
83%	-10	100.5	105.3	-4.8	14	12	53.8%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 7.2 19.2 .375 .412 40% 3% 7.2 23.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 85% .338   50% 0% 0.9

Close 13% .800   25% 20% 0.3

Dunk 3% 1.000   0% 0% 0.1

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 15% .833   20% 17% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 35% .571   25% 7% 0.6

11-15 18% .357   0% 0% 0.2

16-20 20% .250   50% 0% 0.1

21+ 28% .364   100% 0% 0.3

Crunch 48% .316   80% 0% 0.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
15	21	71.4	10.1	7.2	46	6	13.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
5	9	4	6	24	7	3.4	15.4	11.5

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	88	0.0%	29.5%	4	107	3.7%	57.9%	3.7	87.5

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	2	0	0%	5%	0%	2	1.0	1.3%	4	0.50	4.1

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	7	4	0	27.7

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2801	1148	70%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	114.9	104.9	+10.0
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	107.3	105.0	+2.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+7.6	-0.1	+7.8
Points Scored	6245	2302	+3943
Points Allowed	5817	2292	+3525
Net Points	+428	+10	+418
Effective FG%	54.0%	48.6%	+5.3%
Effective FG% Allowed	49.3%	48.9%	+0.4%
Assisted Field Goals	69%	64%	+5%
Assisted FG% Allowed	56%	54%	+2%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	7%	-1%
Shots Blocked	6%	6%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	28.9%	33.1%	-4.2%
Defensive Rebounding	72.3%	74.6%	-2.2%
Total Rebounding	50.6%	53.9%	-3.2%
Stats
Free Throws Made	20	19	+1
Free Throws Attempted	27	26	+1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	20	21	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	27	29	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	14	16	+2
Turnovers, on Defense	14	15	-1
Net Turnovers	0	-1	-1
Fouls Committed	22	23	+1
Fouls, Drawn	22	21	+1
Net Fouls	0	-2	-2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts