Kevin Garnett of the Boston Celtics, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Kevin Garnett
Boston Celtics
2010-2011 NBA Season

More Kevin Garnett stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
56%	+551	1.12	0.98	11.9	51	17	75.0

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 6.1 11.6 .528 .529 79% 2% 2.6 14.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 76% .474   80% 1% 8.4

Close 17% .657   80% 8% 2.6

Dunk 5% .923   83% 0% 1.0

Tips 2% .571   0% 0% .2

Inside 24% .704   76% 6% 3.9

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 26% .611   78% 2% 3.6

11-15 26% .505   81% 4% 3.0

16-20 31% .528   83% 2% 3.7

21+ 18% .445   70% 1% 1.8

Crunch 48% .497   79% 2% 5.6

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
187	217	86.2	4.7	4.0	895	73	8.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
34	48	77	14	173	49	3.5	4.2	3.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
83	1860	4.5%	24.6%	548	2186	25.1%	73.7%	29.5	98.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
17	37	1	1%	4%	1%	55	1.2	1.6%	56	.98	3.9

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
22	49	34	10	13.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Davis	515	1.13	.96	169	35	15	70
2	Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Krstic	284	1.09	.98	48	9	9	50
3	Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-S.O'Neal	265	1.17	.99	101	15	3	83
4	Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Perkins	169	1.14	1.00	44	9	3	75
5	Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-J.O'Neal	127	1.05	1.00	13	5	4	55
6	Robinson-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Davis	117	1.06	.91	31	8	9	47
7	Robinson-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-S.O'Neal	110	1.11	.90	42	6	5	54
8	Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Erden	79	1.14	1.04	9	6	3	66
9	Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Green-Garnett	52	1.14	1.05	21	5	5	50
10	Rondo-Allen-Daniels-Garnett-Davis	41	.97	.92	2	7	6	53
11	West-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Davis	26	.95	1.06	-5	1	3	25
12	Robinson-Allen-Daniels-Garnett-Davis	19	1.04	.78	5	5	4	55
13	West-Allen-Green-Garnett-Davis	19	1.46	1.00	12	5	3	62
14	Robinson-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Erden	18	1.31	1.35	0	1	1	50
15	Rondo-Daniels-Pierce-Garnett-Davis	17	1.25	.60	24	7	0	100
16	Rondo-Pierce-Green-Garnett-Davis	16	.87	1.04	-8	3	4	42
17	Allen-Daniels-Pierce-Garnett-Davis	16	1.20	.82	11	3	0	100
18	Robinson-Daniels-Pierce-Garnett-Davis	15	.87	.82	4	3	3	50
19	Rondo-Allen-Green-Garnett-Davis	14	.71	1.18	-12	3	4	42
20	West-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Krstic	14	1.22	.78	13	2	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Davis .502 .420 +9 31% 31%   49% +5%

2 Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Krstic .489 .443 +57 35% 31%   47% +4%

3 Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-S.O'Neal .582 .435 -23 42% 27%   53% -2%

4 Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Perkins .504 .435 +13 30% 34%   52% 0%

5 Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-J.O'Neal .461 .406 +8 28% 37%   48% -2%

6 Robinson-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Davis .477 .385 -7 28% 25%   50% +4%

7 Robinson-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-S.O'Neal .515 .376 +9 35% 24%   50% -3%

8 Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Erden .555 .448 -22 36% 35%   48% -3%

9 Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Green-Garnett .483 .443 -3 29% 28%   48% +2%

10 Rondo-Allen-Daniels-Garnett-Davis .426 .434 +3 26% 23%   50% +10%

11 West-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Davis .378 .412 -6 24% 38%   45% +15%

12 Robinson-Allen-Daniels-Garnett-Davis .480 .400 +2 32% 24%   58% +6%

13 West-Allen-Green-Garnett-Davis .643 .441 +8 25% 24%   54% +8%

14 Robinson-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Erden .643 .528 +7 36% 25%   39% -5%

15 Rondo-Daniels-Pierce-Garnett-Davis .679 .259 +4 32% 33%   48% +13%

16 Rondo-Pierce-Green-Garnett-Davis .458 .407 -3 38% 15%   50% -2%

17 Allen-Daniels-Pierce-Garnett-Davis .567 .455 -4 27% 32%   49% +22%

18 Robinson-Daniels-Pierce-Garnett-Davis .379 .435 -1 14% 39%   55% +4%

19 Rondo-Allen-Green-Garnett-Davis .304 .455 -5 26% 32%   47% -4%

20 West-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Krstic .545 .304 +2 41% 17%   41% +11%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	53%	+522	100.2	88.4	11.9	52	17	75%
C	2%	+29	116.1	103.0	13.0	19	11	63%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	17.7	.536	4.4	23%	13.7	3.8	2.4	1.2	3.2	22.8	22.4
C	18.4	.390	9.9	31%	13.0	2.2	3.6	.9	3.1	23.4	16.9

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 14.5 .462 4.7 35% 10.9 2.0 2.5 .7 5.0 16.9 14.1

C 11.7 .692 5.8 38% 8.5 .4 .9 .9 5.8 20.2 20.0

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 3.2 .074 -.2 -12% 2.8 1.9 .0 .5 1.7 5.9 8.3

C 6.7 -.302 4.0 -7% 4.5 1.8 -2.7 .0 2.7 3.1 -3.1

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
85%	+13	95.8	91.9	3.9	18	18	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 7.7 16.7 .464 .464 81% 2% 4.2 19.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 79% .386   82% 0% 0.8

Close 16% .667   100% 11% 0.3

Dunk 5% 1.000   33% 0% 0.1

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 21% .750   78% 8% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 27% .533   75% 0% 0.4

11-15 16% .444   100% 11% 0.2

16-20 34% .579   91% 0% 0.5

21+ 23% .231   33% 0% 0.1

Crunch 57% .438   79% 0% 0.7

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
14	16	87.5	4.8	4.2	62	6	9.7%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	3	3	0	7	3	2.3	1.2	2.1

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
10	161	6.2%	27.3%	33	166	19.9%	66.9%	26.1	94.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	4	0	1%	7%	0%	5	1.5	2.1%	6	0.83	5.7

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
4	3	3	1	5.7

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2219	1736	56%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	112.1	101.8	+10.3
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	98.7	105.1	-6.4
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+13.4	-3.3	+16.7
Points Scored	4670	3243	+1427
Points Allowed	4119	3354	+765
Net Points	+551	-111	+662
Effective FG%	53.7%	49.5%	+4.3%
Effective FG% Allowed	46.1%	48.0%	-1.9%
Assisted Field Goals	66%	59%	+7%
Assisted FG% Allowed	56%	53%	+3%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	7%	-2%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	24.6%	24.1%	+0.5%
Defensive Rebounding	73.7%	69.8%	+3.9%
Total Rebounding	49.2%	47.0%	+2.2%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	16	+2
Free Throws Attempted	24	21	+3
Free Throws Made by Opp.	17	18	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	23	25	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	13	15	+2
Turnovers, on Defense	15	14	+1
Net Turnovers	2	-1	-3
Fouls Committed	18	22	+4
Fouls, Drawn	20	19	+1
Net Fouls	2	-3	-5

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts