Zach Randolph of the Memphis Grizzlies, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Zach Randolph
Memphis Grizzlies
2010-2011 NBA Season

More Zach Randolph stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
68%	+259	1.11	1.06	4.6	45	29	60.8

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 8.0 15.8 .504 .507 49% 9% 4.0 20.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 56% .401   49% 7% 7.0

Close 38% .635   54% 13% 7.7

Dunk 1% 1.000   92% 0% .3

Tips 5% .603   0% 3% 1.0

Inside 44% .640   49% 12% 9.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 38% .594   35% 11% 7.1

11-15 23% .451   63% 10% 3.3

16-20 23% .489   59% 9% 3.6

21+ 16% .408   58% 5% 2.0

Crunch 39% .457   59% 7% 5.6

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
300	396	75.8	7.0	5.3	1357	170	12.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
40	42	67	14	163	52	3.1	3.0	2.9

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
326	2588	12.6%	33.5%	588	2493	23.6%	70.4%	36.2	103.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
14	11	0	%	1%	%	25	.4	.6%	68	.37	1.1

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
29	52	57	13	11.3

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Conley-Allen-Young-Randolph-Gasol	403	1.11	1.00	64	18	14	56
2	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	333	1.12	1.13	34	16	14	53
3	Conley-Young-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	303	1.07	.98	60	13	10	56
4	Conley-Henry-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	234	1.06	1.08	-6	9	12	42
5	Conley-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	183	1.09	1.05	8	11	16	40
6	Conley-Mayo-Allen-Randolph-Gasol	78	1.13	1.20	-11	10	11	47
7	Mayo-Vasquez-Gay-Arthur-Randolph	71	1.12	.94	25	11	7	61
8	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Arthur-Randolph	70	1.12	1.17	-11	5	14	26
9	Conley-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Gasol	61	1.06	1.15	-6	7	10	41
10	Conley-Allen-Young-Arthur-Randolph	53	1.06	1.00	0	8	8	50
11	Conley-Allen-Battier-Randolph-Gasol	49	1.15	1.10	-2	5	6	45
12	Conley-Allen-Gay-Arthur-Randolph	44	1.08	.90	7	7	6	53
13	Conley-Mayo-Battier-Arthur-Randolph	41	1.32	.90	33	9	2	81
14	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet	32	1.24	.97	17	8	4	66
15	Conley-Mayo-Battier-Randolph-Gasol	30	1.19	1.11	8	5	3	62
16	Mayo-Allen-Vasquez-Arthur-Randolph	28	1.06	.90	11	4	2	66
17	Conley-Allen-Battier-Arthur-Randolph	27	1.02	.97	4	5	4	55
18	Conley-Young-Gay-Arthur-Randolph	26	1.13	1.06	5	4	3	57
19	Mayo-Vasquez-Young-Arthur-Randolph	24	1.27	1.05	10	5	3	62
20	Conley-Henry-Gay-Arthur-Randolph	23	.93	.88	1	3	3	50

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Conley-Allen-Young-Randolph-Gasol .501 .460 +48 42% 29%   51% +6%

2 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .487 .480 +12 29% 32%   50% 0%

3 Conley-Young-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .476 .423 +30 34% 31%   52% 0%

4 Conley-Henry-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .486 .464 -2 31% 34%   46% +3%

5 Conley-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .489 .507 +14 41% 31%   54% +5%

6 Conley-Mayo-Allen-Randolph-Gasol .454 .563 +8 39% 38%   57% +4%

7 Mayo-Vasquez-Gay-Arthur-Randolph .464 .452 -13 26% 30%   61% +6%

8 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Arthur-Randolph .440 .487 +3 26% 31%   57% -1%

9 Conley-Mayo-Young-Randolph-Gasol .474 .490 -3 40% 31%   54% -9%

10 Conley-Allen-Young-Arthur-Randolph .430 .460 +9 38% 26%   50% +6%

11 Conley-Allen-Battier-Randolph-Gasol .488 .429 -5 36% 31%   58% -3%

12 Conley-Allen-Gay-Arthur-Randolph .486 .377 -5 38% 34%   53% +1%

13 Conley-Mayo-Battier-Arthur-Randolph .557 .339 -24 34% 31%   50% +12%

14 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Thabeet .480 .423 +10 20% 37%   51% +5%

15 Conley-Mayo-Battier-Randolph-Gasol .509 .500 -2 38% 25%   39% +21%

16 Mayo-Allen-Vasquez-Arthur-Randolph .451 .429 -5 29% 29%   53% +5%

17 Conley-Allen-Battier-Arthur-Randolph .420 .489 +10 50% 31%   63% +1%

18 Conley-Young-Gay-Arthur-Randolph .442 .421 +6 35% 32%   59% +3%

19 Mayo-Vasquez-Young-Arthur-Randolph .512 .359 -3 32% 18%   54% 0%

20 Conley-Henry-Gay-Arthur-Randolph .360 .381 -3 38% 38%   50% +10%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	51%	+158	100.4	96.6	3.7	42	32	56%
C	17%	+101	101.0	94.0	7.0	41	23	64%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	20.6	.511	6.5	45%	15.8	3.0	2.5	.4	2.9	25.8	23.0
C	21.8	.497	8.5	42%	17.1	2.5	3.1	.6	3.7	28.5	25.5

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 15.4 .531 3.3 32% 10.1 2.5 2.7 2.1 5.7 18.6 14.6

C 12.0 .567 5.6 37% 10.8 2.0 3.1 2.5 6.3 16.8 15.4

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 5.3 -.020 3.2 13% 5.7 .5 .2 -1.7 2.9 7.2 8.4

C 9.8 -.070 2.9 5% 6.3 .5 .0 -1.9 2.6 11.8 10.0

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
91%	-22	100.6	106.1	-5.5	16	20	44.4%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 9.8 21.4 .459 .459 44% 15% 10.8 30.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 60% .353   50% 12% 0.9

Close 36% .613   42% 23% 0.9

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 4% .667   0% 0% 0.1

Inside 40% .618   38% 21% 1.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 27% .652   27% 13% 0.8

11-15 21% .389   86% 22% 0.3

16-20 31% .462   33% 15% 0.6

21+ 21% .278   60% 11% 0.3

Crunch 52% .386   41% 14% 0.9

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
43	55	78.2	13.9	10.8	105	20	19.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
2	1	0	0	3	1	3.0	0.3	0.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
22	184	12.0%	34.8%	35	178	19.7%	66.3%	31.6	101.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	1	0	0%	1%	0%	1	0.3	0.3%	6	0.17	1.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	3	0	17.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2722	1253	68%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.3	104.2	+7.1
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.6	106.5	+0.1
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+4.7	-2.3	+7.0
Points Scored	5702	2493	+3209
Points Allowed	5443	2560	+2883
Net Points	+259	-67	+326
Effective FG%	49.8%	48.3%	+1.5%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.4%	50.0%	+0.4%
Assisted Field Goals	52%	53%	-1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	58%	57%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	7%	+0%
Shots Blocked	7%	5%	+2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	33.5%	28.9%	+4.6%
Defensive Rebounding	70.4%	67.6%	+2.8%
Total Rebounding	52.0%	48.3%	+3.7%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	16	+2
Free Throws Attempted	24	22	+2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	17	18	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	25	+3
Turnovers, on Offense	13	14	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	15	17	-2
Net Turnovers	2	3	+1
Fouls Committed	19	22	+3
Fouls, Drawn	21	21	+0
Net Fouls	2	-1	-3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts