Zach Randolph of the Memphis Grizzlies, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Zach Randolph
Memphis Grizzlies
2011-2012 NBA Season

More Zach Randolph stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
23%	+112	1.1	1.03	7.3	20	7	74.1

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 4.7 10.2 .463 .467 42% 8% 2.1 11.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 60% .398   40% 8% 4.9

Close 33% .574   50% 10% 3.9

Dunk 1% 1.000   50% 0% .1

Tips 6% .500   0% 0% .6

Inside 40% .570   43% 8% 4.6

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 36% .525   42% 8% 3.8

11-15 29% .421   41% 10% 2.5

16-20 20% .448   35% 7% 1.9

21+ 15% .442   53% 5% 1.4

Crunch 35% .446   42% 6% 3.2

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
58	88	65.9	5.7	3.8	325	40	12.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
18	6	18	6	48	18	2.7	3.1	3.1

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
78	723	10.8%	36.2%	147	664	22.1%	72.9%	32.9	109.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
2	2	0	%	1%	%	4	.3	.4%	24	.17	.7

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
7	18	11	4	12.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Conley-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	154	1.12	.96	50	8	5	61
2	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	83	1.17	1.01	29	13	4	76
3	Arenas-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Speights	46	1.05	.93	8	5	3	62
4	Pargo-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	37	.95	.91	0	2	2	50
5	Mayo-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	26	1.16	1.14	0	3	2	60
6	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Cunningham-Randolph	19	1.10	1.14	2	2	2	50
7	Arenas-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Gasol	18	1.15	1.03	5	3	1	75
8	Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Haddadi	16	1.32	.96	10	2	1	66
9	Pargo-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Speights	16	1.07	.90	4	2	1	66
10	Arenas-Mayo-Pondexter-Cunningham-Randolph	14	1.38	1.44	-6	2	3	40
11	Conley-Mayo-Allen-Randolph-Gasol	14	1.14	.83	5	3	1	75
12	Conley-Pondexter-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	13	1.32	.92	11	4	1	80
13	Conley-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Speights	13	1.00	1.18	-6	0	3	0
14	Arenas-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Speights	11	.76	.88	-7	2	4	33
15	Pargo-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol	11	.57	1.40	-15	2	3	40
16	Selby-Mayo-Pondexter-Cunningham-Randolph	10	1.37	.85	9	2	0	100
17	Selby-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Gasol	9	1.14	1.05	2	2	1	66
18	Pargo-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Haddadi	9	1.19	1.00	3	1	1	50
19	Conley-Allen-Gay-Cunningham-Randolph	9	1.12	1.06	0	1	1	50
20	Pargo-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Gasol	8	1.50	.69	12	2	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Conley-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .490 .450 +19 35% 28%   57% +5%

2 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .483 .462 +5 38% 30%   54% +3%

3 Arenas-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Speights .436 .486 -3 33% 40%   49% +8%

4 Pargo-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .387 .373 +1 35% 19%   62% -5%

5 Mayo-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .426 .455 -1 30% 30%   55% +9%

6 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Cunningham-Randolph .485 .467 -3 18% 40%   58% -10%

7 Arenas-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Gasol .444 .448 -6 31% 38%   56% -6%

8 Conley-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Haddadi .533 .333 -3 37% 33%   56% +11%

9 Pargo-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Speights .524 .423 +7 38% 35%   48% 0%

10 Arenas-Mayo-Pondexter-Cunningham-Randolph .435 .708 +3 9% 25%   68% -5%

11 Conley-Mayo-Allen-Randolph-Gasol .450 .353 -2 45% 29%   51% +16%

12 Conley-Pondexter-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .579 .417 +13 32% 29%   67% -4%

13 Conley-Allen-Gay-Randolph-Speights .522 .480 -4 43% 32%   49% -8%

14 Arenas-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Speights .412 .345 +2 18% 34%   57% -26%

15 Pargo-Mayo-Gay-Randolph-Gasol .167 .474 -6 33% 53%   46% -11%

16 Selby-Mayo-Pondexter-Cunningham-Randolph .619 .444 0 52% 39%   53% +10%

17 Selby-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Gasol .529 .389 -2 47% 33%   42% 0%

18 Pargo-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Haddadi .500 .375 -4 39% 25%   57% -6%

19 Conley-Allen-Gay-Cunningham-Randolph .438 .421 +4 31% 53%   55% -1%

20 Pargo-Mayo-Pondexter-Randolph-Gasol .500 .286 +4 44% 14%   51% +15%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	25%	+124	99.6	90.0	9.6	18	9	66%
C	4%	-14	97.6	103.1	-5.5	7	10	41%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	18.2	.453	5.4	39%	14.0	2.9	2.5	.3	3.5	20.1	16.8
C	20.9	.531	7.7	42%	18.3	4.3	3.0	.0	5.1	26.8	24.5

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 13.8 .427 3.9 29% 9.1 2.2 2.5 2.0 5.2 14.7 10.6

C 14.5 .574 4.7 38% 9.8 1.7 3.0 .4 4.3 19.2 13.8

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 4.4 .026 1.5 10% 4.9 .8 .0 -1.7 1.7 5.4 6.2

C 6.4 -.043 3.0 4% 8.5 2.6 .0 -.4 -.9 7.7 10.7

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
21%	+41	147.4	85.7	61.7	9	2	81.8%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 9.0 19.6 .462 .500 33% 0% 9.0 28.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 46% .750   25% 0% 0.8

Close 46% .333   50% 0% 0.4

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 8% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 54% .286   50% 0% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 38% .700   33% 0% 0.6

11-15 23% .333   0% 0% 0.2

16-20 15% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 23% .667   50% 0% 0.4

Crunch 38% .400   33% 0% 0.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
6	8	75.0	12.0	9.0	15	2	13.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	0	0	0	1	0	1.0	-1.5	1.5

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
3	40	7.5%	32.5%	6	34	17.6%	73.5%	25.1	106.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	1	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	5.2

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	734	2453	23%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.2	103.2	+8.0
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	102.7	102.6	+0.1
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+8.5	+0.6	+7.9
Points Scored	1520	4749	-3229
Points Allowed	1408	4728	-3320
Net Points	+112	+21	+91
Effective FG%	49.3%	46.7%	+2.6%
Effective FG% Allowed	48.9%	48.3%	+0.6%
Assisted Field Goals	52%	53%	-1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	56%	55%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	6%	+1%
Shots Blocked	6%	6%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	36.2%	31.1%	+5.1%
Defensive Rebounding	72.9%	69.4%	+3.5%
Total Rebounding	54.6%	50.2%	+4.3%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	16	+2
Free Throws Attempted	24	22	+2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	17	17	+0
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	22	+0
Turnovers, on Offense	14	14	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	16	17	-1
Net Turnovers	2	3	+1
Fouls Committed	21	19	-2
Fouls, Drawn	20	18	+2
Net Fouls	-1	-1	+0

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts