# |
Unit |
Min |
Off |
Def |
+/- |
W |
L |
Win% |
1 |
Barea-Webster-Johnson-Randolph-Pekovic |
78 |
1.12 |
1.13 |
-4 |
2 |
4 |
33 |
2 |
Rubio-Ellington-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
47 |
.96 |
.92 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
50 |
3 |
Barea-Webster-Beasley-Randolph-Pekovic |
34 |
.99 |
1.18 |
-13 |
1 |
3 |
25 |
4 |
Barea-Rubio-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
21 |
.95 |
.76 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
66 |
5 |
Rubio-Ridnour-Tolliver-Randolph-Love |
19 |
1.43 |
1.00 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
100 |
6 |
Rubio-Webster-Beasley-Randolph-Love |
16 |
1.37 |
1.03 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
100 |
7 |
Ridnour-Ellington-Williams-Beasley-Randolph |
12 |
.82 |
1.32 |
-11 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
Barea-Ellington-Tolliver-Beasley-Randolph |
12 |
1.13 |
.83 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
100 |
9 |
Ellington-Lee-Williams-Beasley-Randolph |
11 |
.96 |
1.38 |
-10 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
Rubio-Ellington-Beasley-Randolph-Love |
11 |
1.44 |
1.00 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
66 |
11 |
Lee-Johnson-Tolliver-Beasley-Randolph |
11 |
1.04 |
1.08 |
-2 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
12 |
Barea-Webster-Johnson-Williams-Randolph |
10 |
1.00 |
.68 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
33 |
13 |
Barea-Ellington-Williams-Beasley-Randolph |
9 |
.90 |
.71 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
100 |
14 |
Barea-Ellington-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
9 |
.88 |
1.00 |
-2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
15 |
Lee-Webster-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
9 |
1.13 |
1.14 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
100 |
16 |
Ellington-Lee-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
8 |
.94 |
1.53 |
-11 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
17 |
Barea-Johnson-Williams-Beasley-Randolph |
8 |
.94 |
1.19 |
-3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
18 |
Rubio-Ellington-Tolliver-Randolph-Love |
8 |
.56 |
1.25 |
-10 |
1 |
3 |
25 |
19 |
Ridnour-Ellington-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
8 |
.50 |
1.21 |
-10 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
Ridnour-Webster-Johnson-Randolph-Love |
7 |
1.00 |
1.39 |
-7 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
# |
Unit |
eFG |
eFGA |
FTA |
Close |
dClose |
Reb |
T/O |
1 |
Barea-Webster-Johnson-Randolph-Pekovic |
.457 |
.455 |
+11 |
41% |
37% |
47% |
-6% |
2 |
Rubio-Ellington-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
.438 |
.432 |
+1 |
21% |
33% |
50% |
-7% |
3 |
Barea-Webster-Beasley-Randolph-Pekovic |
.458 |
.451 |
+4 |
37% |
28% |
44% |
-6% |
4 |
Barea-Rubio-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
.382 |
.333 |
+9 |
44% |
27% |
47% |
+15% |
5 |
Rubio-Ridnour-Tolliver-Randolph-Love |
.548 |
.368 |
+7 |
32% |
29% |
40% |
+5% |
6 |
Rubio-Webster-Beasley-Randolph-Love |
.450 |
.444 |
-4 |
35% |
22% |
68% |
+6% |
7 |
Ridnour-Ellington-Williams-Beasley-Randolph |
.438 |
.632 |
+2 |
25% |
26% |
40% |
-5% |
8 |
Barea-Ellington-Tolliver-Beasley-Randolph |
.474 |
.250 |
0 |
32% |
29% |
37% |
+4% |
9 |
Ellington-Lee-Williams-Beasley-Randolph |
.500 |
.762 |
+2 |
40% |
43% |
25% |
+9% |
10 |
Rubio-Ellington-Beasley-Randolph-Love |
.577 |
.579 |
+1 |
42% |
58% |
58% |
+15% |
11 |
Lee-Johnson-Tolliver-Beasley-Randolph |
.450 |
.444 |
-6 |
15% |
22% |
48% |
-5% |
12 |
Barea-Webster-Johnson-Williams-Randolph |
.474 |
.278 |
-5 |
37% |
28% |
52% |
-6% |
13 |
Barea-Ellington-Williams-Beasley-Randolph |
.333 |
.389 |
0 |
14% |
11% |
65% |
-1% |
14 |
Barea-Ellington-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
.429 |
.571 |
+1 |
36% |
36% |
40% |
+6% |
15 |
Lee-Webster-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
.583 |
.538 |
+2 |
25% |
31% |
49% |
-4% |
16 |
Ellington-Lee-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
.400 |
.714 |
0 |
20% |
36% |
41% |
+11% |
17 |
Barea-Johnson-Williams-Beasley-Randolph |
.538 |
.444 |
-2 |
31% |
22% |
63% |
-41% |
18 |
Rubio-Ellington-Tolliver-Randolph-Love |
.273 |
.462 |
-3 |
0% |
8% |
49% |
-27% |
19 |
Ridnour-Ellington-Tolliver-Williams-Randolph |
.154 |
.438 |
+2 |
8% |
19% |
39% |
-7% |
20 |
Ridnour-Webster-Johnson-Randolph-Love |
.333 |
.667 |
-4 |
20% |
33% |
75% |
-6% |