Nikola Pekovic of the Minnesota Timberwolves, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Nikola Pekovic
Minnesota Timberwolves
2011-2012 NBA Season

More Nikola Pekovic stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
39%	-46	1.07	1.09	-1.7	24	22	52.2

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 5.4 9.7 .564 .564 63% 15% 3.0 13.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 22% .330   67% 25% 1.4

Close 63% .612   63% 15% 7.4

Dunk 7% .967   97% 3% 1.2

Tips 8% .500   0% 0% .8

Inside 78% .630   62% 13% 9.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 44% .576   37% 13% 4.9

11-15 21% .505   92% 23% 2.0

16-20 24% .574   76% 12% 2.6

21+ 12% .604   88% 19% 1.4

Crunch 35% .584   80% 14% 4.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
139	187	74.3	7.1	5.3	543	89	16.4%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
12	10	7	2	31	9	3.4	1.0	1.2

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
182	1262	14.4%	32.8%	165	1255	13.1%	71.1%	27.6	103.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
16	15	0	1%	3%	%	31	1.2	1.4%	53	.58	2.8

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
20	9	44	15	4.9

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Rubio-Ridnour-Johnson-Love-Pekovic	267	1.11	1.09	9	11	8	57
2	Ridnour-Webster-Johnson-Love-Pekovic	95	1.03	1.09	-12	2	5	28
3	Barea-Webster-Johnson-Randolph-Pekovic	78	1.12	1.13	-4	2	4	33
4	Rubio-Ridnour-Johnson-Williams-Pekovic	62	.90	.98	-10	3	2	60
5	Barea-Webster-Johnson-Love-Pekovic	54	.98	1.19	-19	1	2	33
6	Barea-Webster-Beasley-Randolph-Pekovic	34	.99	1.18	-13	1	3	25
7	Barea-Webster-Johnson-Williams-Pekovic	33	1.00	1.30	-19	1	3	25
8	Barea-Webster-Williams-Beasley-Pekovic	32	.91	.99	-7	5	4	55
9	Rubio-Ridnour-Webster-Love-Pekovic	25	1.21	.88	20	5	1	83
10	Ridnour-Ellington-Johnson-Love-Pekovic	23	1.47	1.00	22	4	0	100
11	Rubio-Webster-Beasley-Love-Pekovic	22	1.32	1.07	9	4	3	57
12	Ridnour-Webster-Williams-Beasley-Pekovic	19	1.20	1.11	3	3	1	75
13	Rubio-Webster-Johnson-Love-Pekovic	17	1.00	1.31	-12	1	2	33
14	Barea-Ridnour-Webster-Love-Pekovic	16	1.48	.79	20	2	0	100
15	Rubio-Ellington-Tolliver-Williams-Pekovic	16	1.19	1.03	7	2	1	66
16	Barea-Ellington-Williams-Beasley-Pekovic	14	1.03	.89	5	3	1	75
17	Barea-Ellington-Webster-Tolliver-Pekovic	13	.54	1.15	-16	0	3	0
18	Barea-Ellington-Tolliver-Beasley-Pekovic	13	.96	1.44	-12	1	2	33
19	Rubio-Ellington-Beasley-Love-Pekovic	13	1.19	1.00	7	3	0	100
20	Ridnour-Ellington-Tolliver-Love-Pekovic	12	1.16	1.04	4	3	1	75

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Rubio-Ridnour-Johnson-Love-Pekovic .462 .483 +2 37% 32%   56% -2%

2 Ridnour-Webster-Johnson-Love-Pekovic .434 .448 -2 39% 26%   54% -8%

3 Barea-Webster-Johnson-Randolph-Pekovic .457 .455 +11 41% 37%   47% -6%

4 Rubio-Ridnour-Johnson-Williams-Pekovic .439 .463 0 35% 39%   46% +2%

5 Barea-Webster-Johnson-Love-Pekovic .426 .550 +3 31% 28%   48% -1%

6 Barea-Webster-Beasley-Randolph-Pekovic .458 .451 +4 37% 28%   44% -6%

7 Barea-Webster-Johnson-Williams-Pekovic .421 .509 -4 37% 18%   47% -2%

8 Barea-Webster-Williams-Beasley-Pekovic .442 .355 +3 25% 37%   41% -15%

9 Rubio-Ridnour-Webster-Love-Pekovic .370 .439 +14 35% 24%   70% +3%

10 Ridnour-Ellington-Johnson-Love-Pekovic .575 .367 -1 35% 23%   53% +16%

11 Rubio-Webster-Beasley-Love-Pekovic .561 .486 0 44% 22%   63% +3%

12 Ridnour-Webster-Williams-Beasley-Pekovic .471 .571 +6 41% 25%   48% +17%

13 Rubio-Webster-Johnson-Love-Pekovic .452 .455 -7 32% 42%   52% -12%

14 Barea-Ridnour-Webster-Love-Pekovic .615 .417 +6 23% 21%   59% +14%

15 Rubio-Ellington-Tolliver-Williams-Pekovic .533 .417 -5 40% 29%   51% +4%

16 Barea-Ellington-Williams-Beasley-Pekovic .450 .370 +9 25% 15%   47% -6%

17 Barea-Ellington-Webster-Tolliver-Pekovic .238 .440 +4 24% 28%   50% -12%

18 Barea-Ellington-Tolliver-Beasley-Pekovic .385 .630 +6 35% 26%   50% -3%

19 Rubio-Ellington-Beasley-Love-Pekovic .423 .478 +5 38% 9%   64% +1%

20 Ridnour-Ellington-Tolliver-Love-Pekovic .476 .450 -2 19% 20%   57% -4%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	49%	-46	99.1	100.8	-1.7	24	22	52%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	17.3	.564	7.1	77%	13.2	1.2	3.3	1.2	3.7	24.7	21.9

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 13.2 .452 4.0 42% 11.4 2.2 1.9 3.3 6.5 14.6 13.4

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 4.1 .111 3.1 35% 1.8 -1.0 -1.4 -2.1 2.8 10.1 8.5

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
41%	-24	93.9	113.0	-19.1	6	12	33.3%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 8.0 11.1 .714 .714 70% 7% 5.6 21.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 29% .250   100% 0% 0.1

Close 43% .833   80% 17% 0.5

Dunk 14% 1.000   100% 0% 0.2

Tips 14% 1.000   0% 0% 0.2

Inside 71% .900   67% 10% 0.9

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 36% .800   25% 0% 0.4

11-15 36% .600   100% 0% 0.3

16-20 14% .500   100% 50% 0.1

21+ 14% 1.000   100% 0% 0.2

Crunch 29% .750   100% 25% 0.3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
7	7	100.0	5.6	5.6	18	4	22.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
2	1	0	0	3	0	3.0	0.8	2.4

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
7	53	13.2%	22.6%	6	61	9.8%	67.2%	23.0	89.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	1	0	5%	6%	0%	5	4.0	5.2%	5	1.00	8.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	1	2	0	4.2

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1262	1924	39%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	108.3	103.6	+4.6
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.2	106.0	+3.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-1.0	-2.3	+1.4
Points Scored	2607	3857	-1250
Points Allowed	2653	3956	-1303
Net Points	-46	-99	+53
Effective FG%	48.4%	47.2%	+1.2%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.2%	48.3%	+1.8%
Assisted Field Goals	57%	52%	+5%
Assisted FG% Allowed	56%	54%	+2%
Own Shots Blocked	8%	6%	+2%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	32.8%	28.3%	+4.5%
Defensive Rebounding	71.1%	70.7%	+0.4%
Total Rebounding	51.9%	49.5%	+2.4%
Stats
Free Throws Made	19	19	+0
Free Throws Attempted	24	25	-1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	15	16	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	20	21	+1
Turnovers, on Offense	14	15	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	12	13	-1
Net Turnovers	-2	-2	+0
Fouls Committed	17	18	+1
Fouls, Drawn	21	21	+0
Net Fouls	4	3	-1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts