DeMarre Carroll of the Utah Jazz, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

DeMarre Carroll
Utah Jazz
2011-2012 NBA Season

More DeMarre Carroll stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
10%	-10	1.11	1.12	-1.5	6	11	35.3

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.9 4.9 .374 .409 70% 12% .7 4.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 73% .354   86% 7% 2.5

Close 26% .538   43% 27% 1.4

Dunk 1% 1.000   100% 0% .1

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 27% .556   47% 26% 1.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 35% .514   50% 11% 1.8

11-15 20% .375   100% 5% .8

16-20 25% .460   89% 12% 1.1

21+ 19% .184   67% 21% .3

Crunch 44% .341   83% 16% 1.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
14	16	87.5	2.3	2.0	106	7	6.6%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	7	4	3	15	6	2.5	2.3	2.2

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
28	320	8.8%	38.4%	22	281	7.8%	72.2%	16.6	110.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	1	0	%	1%	%	1	.1	.2%	19	.05	.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	6	2	0	21.2

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Harris-Hayward-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson	150	1.10	1.12	-7	5	4	55
2	Tinsley-Burks-Carroll-Favors-Kanter	39	1.20	1.26	-3	3	4	42
3	Watson-Burks-Carroll-Favors-Kanter	35	.86	1.05	-13	0	3	0
4	Harris-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson	29	1.37	1.05	18	4	2	66
5	Tinsley-Burks-Carroll-Millsap-Favors	5	1.27	1.08	1	2	1	66
6	Tinsley-Hayward-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson	5	1.50	.40	11	2	0	100
7	Ahearn-Burks-Carroll-Evans-Kanter	5	.44	1.30	-9	0	1	0
8	Harris-Burks-Carroll-Millsap-Favors	4	1.63	1.00	4	1	1	50
9	Ahearn-Burks-Carroll-Evans-Favors	4	.90	1.30	-4	0	1	0
10	Harris-Hayward-Carroll-Millsap-Favors	3	.78	1.00	-1	0	1	0
11	Watson-Burks-Carroll-Millsap-Favors	3	1.63	1.00	6	1	0	100
12	Watson-Hayward-Carroll-Evans-Favors	3	.80	.67	0	0	0	0
13	Ahearn-Tinsley-Carroll-Favors-Kanter	3	1.00	1.00	0	0	0	0
14	Watson-Burks-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson	3	.50	1.00	-2	0	2	0
15	Harris-Howard-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson	3	.83	.67	1	1	0	100
16	Watson-Tinsley-Carroll-Evans-Kanter	2	1.00	.83	1	1	0	100
17	Tinsley-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson	2	1.00	1.25	-1	0	1	0
18	Watson-Burks-Carroll-Evans-Kanter	2	1.60	1.00	3	1	0	100
19	Harris-Burks-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson	2	2.00	1.00	3	1	0	100
20	Harris-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Kanter	2	1.67	1.25	0	1	1	50

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Harris-Hayward-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson .478 .494 -6 27% 36%   48% +3%

2 Tinsley-Burks-Carroll-Favors-Kanter .466 .569 +3 34% 50%   69% -4%

3 Watson-Burks-Carroll-Favors-Kanter .309 .455 +18 49% 16%   64% -11%

4 Harris-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson .547 .460 +10 25% 28%   57% +7%

5 Tinsley-Burks-Carroll-Millsap-Favors .455 .500 -7 27% 50%   64% -1%

6 Tinsley-Hayward-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson .700 0 -6 30% 38%   38% +20%

7 Ahearn-Burks-Carroll-Evans-Kanter .125 .571 -2 13% 29%   39% -2%

8 Harris-Burks-Carroll-Millsap-Favors .600 .429 -3 30% 43%   88% -1%

9 Ahearn-Burks-Carroll-Evans-Favors .500 .714 +1 17% 14%   25% 0%

10 Harris-Hayward-Carroll-Millsap-Favors .429 .400 -5 43% 40%   63% -21%

11 Watson-Burks-Carroll-Millsap-Favors .444 .429 +8 78% 14%   68% +16%

12 Watson-Hayward-Carroll-Evans-Favors .333 .333 0 17% 50%   63% 0%

13 Ahearn-Tinsley-Carroll-Favors-Kanter .500 .500 0 25% 0%   75% +20%

14 Watson-Burks-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson 0 .500 +4 0% 0%   58% +4%

15 Harris-Howard-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson .400 .333 +2 20% 17%   63% -16%

16 Watson-Tinsley-Carroll-Evans-Kanter .750 .167 -4 50% 50%   20% -17%

17 Tinsley-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson .400 .250 -4 40% 25%   58% -25%

18 Watson-Burks-Carroll-Evans-Kanter .800 .500 -4 60% 75%   17% +20%

19 Harris-Burks-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson .600 .500 -4 60% 50%   75% 0%

20 Harris-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Kanter 1 .333 -2 50% 0%   25% -8%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF	12%	-5	97.3	97.9	-.6	7	11	38%
PF	0%	-6	81.1	202.8	-121.7		2	0%
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF	14.6	.409	2.4	27%	7.4	2.2	1.3	.1	5.2	14.0	9.6
PF	.0	.000	.0	0%	.0	.0	.0	.0	20.3	.0	.0
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF 15.6 .538 6.8 32% 7.1 2.9 1.9 1.0 2.1 21.6 17.6

PF 20.3 .000 .0 0% .0 .0 .0 .0 20.3 .0 .0

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF -1.0 -.129 -4.4 -5% .3 -.7 .6 -.9 -3.1 -7.7 -8.0

PF -20.3 .000 .0 0% .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
10%	0	108.3	108.3	0.0	1	1	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 2.4 7.1 .333 .000 0% 33% 4.7 4.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .000   0% 33% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 33% .000   0% 100% 0.0

21+ 67% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 100% .000   0% 33% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	2	100.0	4.7	4.7	4	1	25.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	2	0	0	2	1	2.0	0.0	4.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	20	5.0%	30.0%	0	19	0.0%	73.7%	5.0	103.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	2.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	328	2904	10%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	113.0	107.1	+5.9
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	112.9	106.6	+6.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+0.1	+0.5	-0.3
Points Scored	665	5912	-5247
Points Allowed	675	5861	-5186
Net Points	-10	+51	-61
Effective FG%	49.6%	47.9%	+1.7%
Effective FG% Allowed	52.6%	48.9%	+3.7%
Assisted Field Goals	57%	56%	+1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	56%	56%	+0%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	6%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	7%	-2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	38.4%	32.0%	+6.5%
Defensive Rebounding	72.2%	71.6%	+0.6%
Total Rebounding	55.3%	51.8%	+3.6%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	18	-2
Free Throws Attempted	24	24	+0
Free Throws Made by Opp.	19	19	+0
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	25	25	+0
Turnovers, on Offense	13	13	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	13	14	-1
Net Turnovers	0	1	+1
Fouls Committed	21	21	+0
Fouls, Drawn	19	20	-1
Net Fouls	-2	-1	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts