Marquis Teague of the Chicago Bulls, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Marquis Teague
Chicago Bulls
2012-2013 NBA Season

More Marquis Teague stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
9%	-10	1.01	1.01	-1.2	17	25	40.5

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game .9 2.4 .381 .398 35% 11% .2 2.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 59% .343   33% 7% 1.0

Close 41% .478   36% 15% .9

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 41% .478   36% 15% .9

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 27% .433   38% 17% .5

11-15 20% .370   38% 9% .4

16-20 19% .318   14% 9% .3

21+ 34% .434   40% 8% .7

Crunch 53% .392   32% 8% 1.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
9	16	56.3	2.0	1.1	120	7	5.8%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
12	30	12	9	63	20	3.2	7.6	7.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
3	380	.8%	31.6%	41	357	11.5%	74.8%	12.3	106.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	3	0	1%	2%	%	7	.9	1.2%	24	.29	2.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	20	14	0	15.4

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Teague-Cook-Butler-Radmanovic-Mohammed	40	1.04	1.21	-11	2	4	33
2	Teague-Butler-Deng-Gibson-Noah	28	1.09	.83	15	2	1	66
3	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Deng-Noah	25	1.07	1.16	-10	2	5	28
4	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Gibson-Noah	22	.95	.90	1	2	4	33
5	Teague-Belinelli-Deng-Gibson-Noah	19	1.06	.87	1	4	5	44
6	Teague-Belinelli-Deng-Boozer-Noah	19	1.09	1.06	0	2	4	33
7	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Radmanovic-Mohammed	17	.94	1.03	-6	2	3	40
8	Teague-Belinelli-Deng-Gibson-Mohammed	15	1.11	1.11	0	2	2	50
9	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Gibson-Mohammed	15	1.38	.92	13	4	1	80
10	Teague-Hamilton-Deng-Boozer-Noah	14	1.00	.93	0	0	0	0
11	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Boozer-Mohammed	14	.87	.97	-2	4	2	66
12	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Boozer-Noah	14	.76	.60	4	3	2	60
13	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Deng-Mohammed	13	.91	1.35	-10	0	3	0
14	Teague-Cook-Butler-Deng-Gibson	12	1.13	1.14	2	2	1	66
15	Robinson-Teague-Butler-Radmanovic-Mohammed	8	.94	.65	5	1	1	50
16	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Deng-Gibson	8	1.24	.94	4	2	1	66
17	Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Gibson-Boozer	8	1.00	1.00	-2	1	2	33
18	Teague-Hamilton-Deng-Gibson-Noah	7	.53	1.07	-7	0	2	0
19	Robinson-Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Gibson	7	1.38	1.36	-1	0	1	0
20	Robinson-Teague-Belinelli-Deng-Noah	5	1.46	1.09	7	2	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Teague-Cook-Butler-Radmanovic-Mohammed .418 .492 -16 30% 32%   51% -2%

2 Teague-Butler-Deng-Gibson-Noah .478 .356 +6 33% 18%   55% +3%

3 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Deng-Noah .390 .550 -1 32% 25%   55% 0%

4 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Gibson-Noah .500 .353 0 43% 32%   47% -6%

5 Teague-Belinelli-Deng-Gibson-Noah .467 .382 0 30% 21%   62% -11%

6 Teague-Belinelli-Deng-Boozer-Noah .455 .448 -8 48% 45%   49% +2%

7 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Radmanovic-Mohammed .519 .455 -11 37% 52%   48% -16%

8 Teague-Belinelli-Deng-Gibson-Mohammed .464 .500 -7 43% 54%   52% -7%

9 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Gibson-Mohammed .615 .400 -3 38% 20%   68% -3%

10 Teague-Hamilton-Deng-Boozer-Noah .360 .476 +3 52% 19%   67% +6%

11 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Boozer-Mohammed .333 .444 +7 29% 44%   43% -6%

12 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Boozer-Noah .348 .263 -9 22% 16%   63% -16%

13 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Deng-Mohammed .389 .474 -8 6% 26%   50% -17%

14 Teague-Cook-Butler-Deng-Gibson .440 .417 +3 44% 38%   49% -4%

15 Robinson-Teague-Butler-Radmanovic-Mohammed .500 .455 0 29% 18%   25% +36%

16 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Deng-Gibson .500 .500 +4 42% 36%   44% +5%

17 Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Gibson-Boozer .545 .471 +1 64% 41%   46% -16%

18 Teague-Hamilton-Deng-Gibson-Noah .308 .455 -5 46% 27%   61% -19%

19 Robinson-Teague-Belinelli-Butler-Gibson .500 .583 0 44% 42%   60% +14%

20 Robinson-Teague-Belinelli-Deng-Noah .556 .333 +2 22% 50%   44% -15%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	8%	-27	85.5	89.1	-3.6	14	23	37%
SG	1%	+16	101.9	83.2	18.7	5	3	62%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	12.9	.394	1.9	40%	5.6	7.4	4.4	.7	6.2	11.4	4.8
SG	22.3	.421	2.3	42%	3.5	10.5	3.5	2.3	2.3	18.7	10.1
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 18.2 .466 6.4 29% 6.4 5.9 3.6 .5 3.1 22.2 15.4

SG 17.6 .500 5.9 20% 1.2 2.3 1.2 1.2 5.9 22.3 12.9

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -5.3 -.073 -4.5 11% -.8 1.5 -.8 .1 -3.0 -10.8 -10.6

SG 4.7 -.079 -3.5 22% 2.3 8.2 -2.3 1.2 3.5 -3.5 -2.8

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
9%	+4	102.0	91.6	10.5	2	4	33.3%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 5.2 10.5 .500 .500 0% 0% 5.2 15.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .500   0% 0% 0.7

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 25% 1.000   0% 0% 0.3

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 25% 1.000   0% 0% 0.3

21+ 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 75% .333   0% 0% 0.3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	3	66.7	7.8	5.2	5	1	20.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	1	1	0	1.0	5.2	2.6

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	16	0.0%	31.3%	0	20	0.0%	75.0%	0.0	106.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	2	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	10.3

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	391	3574	9%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	101.5	104.9	-3.5
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	100.2	104.5	-4.2
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+1.2	+0.5	+0.7
Points Scored	712	6929	-6217
Points Allowed	722	6893	-6171
Net Points	-10	+36	-46
Effective FG%	46.5%	47.1%	-0.5%
Effective FG% Allowed	46.5%	47.8%	-1.3%
Assisted Field Goals	63%	64%	-1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	52%	53%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	7%	+0%
Shots Blocked	7%	6%	+1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	31.6%	32.3%	-0.7%
Defensive Rebounding	74.8%	70.9%	+3.9%
Total Rebounding	53.2%	51.6%	+1.6%
Stats
Free Throws Made	14	16	-2
Free Throws Attempted	19	21	-2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	16	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	24	21	-3
Turnovers, on Offense	15	14	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	13	13	+0
Net Turnovers	-2	-1	+1
Fouls Committed	20	19	-1
Fouls, Drawn	18	19	-1
Net Fouls	-2	0	+2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts