Beno Udrih of the Orlando Magic, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Beno Udrih
Orlando Magic
2012-2013 NBA Season

More Beno Udrih stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
18%	-134	1.02	1.11	-8.7	8	19	29.6

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 3.6 8.8 .408 .452 28% 5% 2.2 10.2

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 82% .431   34% 3% 6.3

Close 18% .548   9% 19% 1.7

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 18% .548   9% 19% 1.7

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 39% .478   24% 5% 3.3

11-15 31% .514   29% 4% 2.8

16-20 19% .444   35% 7% 1.5

21+ 11% .204   20% 7% .4

Crunch 30% .354   32% 7% 1.9

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
60	70	85.7	4.6	3.9	264	26	9.8%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
33	68	48	16	165	32	5.2	12.8	10.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
17	782	2.2%	29.3%	46	734	6.3%	69.6%	8.4	98.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	1	0	%	%	%	1	.1	.1%	22	.05	.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
2	32	21	0	25.0

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Udrih-Moore-Harkless-Harris-Vucevic	83	1.06	1.06	9	3	6	33
2	Udrih-Jones-Harkless-Harris-Vucevic	46	.88	1.06	-17	1	4	20
3	Udrih-Harkless-Harris-Nicholson-Vucevic	39	1.01	.99	1	2	3	40
4	Udrih-Lamb-Harkless-Harris-Vucevic	37	1.05	1.12	-6	2	3	40
5	Nelson-Udrih-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn	30	1.10	1.16	0	2	1	66
6	Udrih-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn-Vucevic	27	.91	1.15	-13	1	3	25
7	Udrih-Afflalo-Harkless-Harris-Vucevic	26	.96	1.04	-2	2	4	33
8	Nelson-Udrih-Afflalo-Harris-Vucevic	22	1.25	.84	19	2	1	66
9	Nelson-Udrih-Moore-Harkless-Harris	20	.97	1.14	-5	0	1	0
10	Udrih-Moore-Afflalo-Harris-Vucevic	18	.82	1.19	-12	0	3	0
11	Udrih-Lamb-Jones-Harris-O'Quinn	16	1.23	1.12	6	2	2	50
12	Udrih-Moore-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn	15	.80	1.28	-17	1	3	25
13	Udrih-Jones-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn	15	1.16	1.13	2	3	1	75
14	Udrih-Lamb-Jones-Nicholson-O'Quinn	14	1.15	1.16	2	1	1	50
15	Udrih-Lamb-Jones-Harris-Vucevic	13	1.08	.92	5	1	0	100
16	Udrih-Moore-Afflalo-Harris-Harrington	13	1.11	1.15	1	2	2	50
17	Udrih-Afflalo-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn	12	1.15	1.04	3	1	0	100
18	Udrih-Moore-Jones-Harris-Harrington	12	1.76	.95	16	3	1	75
19	Udrih-Moore-Harkless-Harris-Nicholson	11	.88	.72	3	1	0	100
20	Udrih-Lamb-Jones-Harris-Harrington	11	.71	1.29	-14	0	2	0

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Udrih-Moore-Harkless-Harris-Vucevic .461 .439 +7 39% 43%   50% -1%

2 Udrih-Jones-Harkless-Harris-Vucevic .353 .476 +9 41% 38%   47% +8%

3 Udrih-Harkless-Harris-Nicholson-Vucevic .471 .403 -2 31% 26%   51% -2%

4 Udrih-Lamb-Harkless-Harris-Vucevic .479 .462 -8 45% 29%   52% -2%

5 Nelson-Udrih-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn .441 .490 -8 46% 41%   55% -3%

6 Udrih-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn-Vucevic .400 .465 -12 36% 28%   49% +2%

7 Udrih-Afflalo-Harkless-Harris-Vucevic .475 .447 -1 20% 32%   39% -6%

8 Nelson-Udrih-Afflalo-Harris-Vucevic .511 .286 -9 27% 29%   57% +2%

9 Nelson-Udrih-Moore-Harkless-Harris .361 .448 -8 31% 45%   47% +6%

10 Udrih-Moore-Afflalo-Harris-Vucevic .419 .483 -8 52% 24%   66% -25%

11 Udrih-Lamb-Jones-Harris-O'Quinn .567 .433 0 30% 43%   45% +4%

12 Udrih-Moore-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn .348 .483 -4 26% 34%   38% -8%

13 Udrih-Jones-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn .464 .346 -7 29% 35%   41% +4%

14 Udrih-Lamb-Jones-Nicholson-O'Quinn .478 .375 +1 39% 25%   59% -17%

15 Udrih-Lamb-Jones-Harris-Vucevic .481 .435 0 33% 17%   60% +1%

16 Udrih-Moore-Afflalo-Harris-Harrington .462 .524 -1 19% 33%   48% +12%

17 Udrih-Afflalo-Harkless-Harris-O'Quinn .600 .450 -4 40% 20%   44% +4%

18 Udrih-Moore-Jones-Harris-Harrington .778 .333 -2 33% 22%   54% 0%

19 Udrih-Moore-Harkless-Harris-Nicholson .292 .100 -4 25% 20%   43% +16%

20 Udrih-Lamb-Jones-Harris-Harrington .250 .524 +2 30% 24%   49% -8%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	15%	-88	95.2	102.1	-6.9	10	16	38%
SG	3%	-47	91.9	109.8	-17.8	1	7	12%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	15.5	.437	4.5	17%	4.0	11.6	3.6	.1	3.2	17.4	14.7
SG	15.1	.526	5.0	17%	4.7	6.6	3.5	.0	3.9	20.2	16.2
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 18.4 .492 3.4 21% 5.3 9.7 3.1 .7 2.9 20.9 17.2

SG 14.7 .553 2.7 7% 4.3 3.1 2.7 .8 3.9 19.0 13.0

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -2.9 -.054 1.0 -4% -1.3 1.9 -.5 -.6 -.3 -3.4 -2.5

SG .4 -.027 2.3 10% .4 3.5 -.8 -.8 .0 1.2 3.2

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
24%	-11	82.3	95.8	-13.5	3	6	33.3%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 3.7 14.7 .250 .292 33% 17% 6.1 14.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 58% .214   100% 14% 0.3

Close 42% .400   0% 20% 0.4

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 42% .400   0% 20% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 33% .250   0% 25% 0.2

11-15 58% .357   50% 14% 0.6

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 8% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 17% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
5	6	83.3	7.4	6.1	14	2	14.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	1	3	0	4	3	1.3	1.2	4.9

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	46	0.0%	23.9%	2	42	4.8%	71.4%	4.8	95.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	3	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	3	0	0	8.8

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	738	3217	18%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	101.2	102.7	-1.5
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	112.5	110.2	+2.4
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-11.3	-7.4	-3.9
Points Scored	1456	6262	-4806
Points Allowed	1590	6701	-5111
Net Points	-134	-439	+305
Effective FG%	46.7%	48.9%	-2.2%
Effective FG% Allowed	51.0%	50.8%	+0.2%
Assisted Field Goals	58%	60%	-2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	65%	60%	+5%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	5%	+2%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	29.3%	27.9%	+1.4%
Defensive Rebounding	69.6%	72.2%	-2.6%
Total Rebounding	49.5%	50.1%	-0.6%
Stats
Free Throws Made	13	12	+1
Free Throws Attempted	19	15	+4
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	15	-3
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	24	21	-3
Turnovers, on Offense	14	14	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	13	12	+1
Net Turnovers	-1	-2	-1
Fouls Committed	20	18	-2
Fouls, Drawn	16	16	+0
Net Fouls	-4	-2	+2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts