Lorenzo Brown of the Minnesota Timberwolves, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Lorenzo Brown
Minnesota Timberwolves
2014-2015 NBA Season

More Lorenzo Brown stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
13%	-94	1.07	1.16	-8.2	9	17	34.6

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.8 4.2 .426 .451 38% 7% .4 4.2

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 64% .397   39% 5% 2.1

Close 31% .526   35% 13% 1.4

Dunk 4% .800   50% 0% .3

Tips 1% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 36% .545   38% 11% 1.7

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 45% .582   43% 9% 2.2

11-15 23% .411   36% 11% .8

16-20 18% .432   33% 5% .7

21+ 14% .118   0% 0% .1

Crunch 32% .295   27% 3% .8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
12	19	63.2	1.7	1.1	128	6	4.7%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
29	34	18	9	90	19	4.7	8.5	7.9

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
14	497	2.8%	27.4%	56	496	11.3%	68.8%	14.1	96.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	2		1%	1%	%	6	.5	.7%	26	.23	1.1

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
	19	11		18.6

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Payne-Dieng	51	.99	1.22	-18	0	4	0
2	Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Budinger-Dieng	49	1.04	1.02	-4	3	2	60
3	Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Budinger-Payne	35	1.00	1.12	-8	1	3	25
4	Brown-Martin-Wiggins-Young-Dieng	29	1.16	1.03	10	2	0	100
5	Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Payne-Hamilton	26	1.06	1.38	-12	0	3	0
6	Brown-Martin-Wiggins-Young-Pekovic	25	.94	1.12	-10	1	2	33
7	Brown-Wiggins-Budinger-Hummel-Payne	18	1.24	1.36	2	2	2	50
8	Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Budinger-Hamilton	15	1.17	1.57	-13	1	3	25
9	Brown-Wiggins-Budinger-Hummel-Hamilton	14	1.04	1.28	-3	1	2	33
10	Brown-LaVine-Budinger-Payne-Hamilton	12	1.36	.71	17	3	1	75
11	Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Hummel-Onuaku	12	1.24	1.23	-1	0	1	0
12	Brown-Martin-Budinger-Bennett-Pekovic	11	1.05	1.18	-3	0	1	0
13	Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Hummel-Payne	10	.83	1.35	-12	0	3	0
14	Brown-Wiggins-Budinger-Payne-Hamilton	10	1.44	1.53	0	1	2	33
15	Brown-LaVine-Budinger-Hummel-Payne	9	1.37	.84	10	2	2	50
16	Brown-Martin-Wiggins-Budinger-Dieng	9	1.11	1.14	-3	0	2	0
17	Brown-LaVine-Kilpatrick-Budinger-Dieng	9	.90	.55	8	3	0	100
18	Brown-Kilpatrick-Wiggins-Budinger-Dieng	9	1.00	1.16	-5	1	1	50
19	Brown-Martin-Budinger-Hummel-Payne	8	.75	1.19	-7	0	2	0
20	Brown-Neal-Martin-Budinger-Payne	7	1.60	1.46	5	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Payne-Dieng .463 .500 +3 28% 34%   46% -2%

2 Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Budinger-Dieng .415 .345 +9 34% 30%   47% -7%

3 Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Budinger-Payne .396 .500 +5 26% 34%   38% +6%

4 Brown-Martin-Wiggins-Young-Dieng .439 .478 +11 32% 30%   55% +15%

5 Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Payne-Hamilton .486 .676 0 22% 43%   57% -12%

6 Brown-Martin-Wiggins-Young-Pekovic .356 .442 +1 27% 31%   42% -3%

7 Brown-Wiggins-Budinger-Hummel-Payne .455 .615 +9 52% 27%   57% +10%

8 Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Budinger-Hamilton .583 .500 -4 42% 35%   31% -7%

9 Brown-Wiggins-Budinger-Hummel-Hamilton .478 .455 +9 30% 42%   37% -10%

10 Brown-LaVine-Budinger-Payne-Hamilton .545 .353 +5 45% 35%   46% +29%

11 Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Hummel-Onuaku .526 .476 -2 26% 52%   66% -15%

12 Brown-Martin-Budinger-Bennett-Pekovic .471 .524 +3 47% 33%   51% -14%

13 Brown-LaVine-Wiggins-Hummel-Payne .389 .643 -8 28% 21%   34% +14%

14 Brown-Wiggins-Budinger-Payne-Hamilton .611 .563 +1 33% 25%   56% 0%

15 Brown-LaVine-Budinger-Hummel-Payne .500 .412 +5 22% 24%   53% +11%

16 Brown-Martin-Wiggins-Budinger-Dieng .313 .571 +3 13% 29%   64% +14%

17 Brown-LaVine-Kilpatrick-Budinger-Dieng .467 .400 +1 40% 30%   38% +27%

18 Brown-Kilpatrick-Wiggins-Budinger-Dieng .500 .529 0 64% 35%   50% -8%

19 Brown-Martin-Budinger-Hummel-Payne .400 .500 +1 10% 31%   28% -7%

20 Brown-Neal-Martin-Budinger-Payne .769 .727 +1 8% 27%   50% +9%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	13%	-92	98.1	106.2	-8.1	8	16	33%
SG	0%	-4	90.0	106.9	-16.9	1	1	50%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	10.6	.437	1.7	35%	6.1	8.0	2.6	.5	4.4	10.3	11.1
SG	16.9	1.000	.0	66%	11.3	.0	5.6	.0	.0	33.8	39.7
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 18.2 .525 4.8 25% 5.3 6.9 4.3 .3 2.8 23.0 16.9

SG 11.3 1.500 .0 0% .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 33.8 41.8

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -7.6 -.088 -3.1 10% .7 1.2 1.7 .3 -1.5 -12.7 -5.8

SG 5.6 -.500 .0 66% 11.3 .0 -5.6 .0 .0 .0 -2.1

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
12%	-22	66.0	116.0	-50.0	0	4	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 2.3 2.3 1.000 1.000 0% 0% 2.3 6.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 100% 1.000   0% 0% 0.4

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 100% 1.000   0% 0% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 100% 1.000   0% 0% 0.4

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
1	2	50.0	4.5	2.3	2	1	50.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	1	0	1	0	1.0	0.0	2.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	19	5.3%	26.3%	2	25	8.0%	60.0%	13.3	86.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	2	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	1.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	548	3412	13%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	108.2	103.4	+4.7
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	116.2	112.7	+3.6
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-8.1	-9.2	+1.1
Points Scored	1119	6897	-5778
Points Allowed	1213	7524	-6311
Net Points	-94	-627	+533
Effective FG%	49.5%	46.3%	+3.2%
Effective FG% Allowed	55.3%	53.4%	+1.9%
Assisted Field Goals	57%	59%	-2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	57%	57%	+0%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	6%	+1%
Shots Blocked	4%	4%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	27.4%	30.2%	-2.8%
Defensive Rebounding	68.8%	69.6%	-0.8%
Total Rebounding	48.1%	49.9%	-1.8%
Stats
Free Throws Made	21	19	+2
Free Throws Attempted	25	25	+0
Free Throws Made by Opp.	16	15	-1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	21	20	-1
Turnovers, on Offense	14	14	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	14	15	-1
Net Turnovers	0	1	+1
Fouls Committed	18	19	+1
Fouls, Drawn	20	21	-1
Net Fouls	2	2	+0

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts