Steve Novak of the Utah Jazz, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Steve Novak
Utah Jazz
2014-2015 NBA Season

More Steve Novak stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
2%	-30	0.96	1.15	-13.2	4	12	25.0

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game .7 1.6 .457 .686 100% 3% .0 2.2

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .686   100% 3% 2.2

Close 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 37% .923   100% 0% 1.1

11-15 37% .462   100% 8% .5

16-20 11% .750   100% 0% .3

21+ 14% .600   100% 0% .3

Crunch 26% .667   100% 0% .5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
	2	.0	.9	.0	35		.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
3		3		6	1	6.0	3.1	2.6

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	125	.8%	29.6%	15	110	13.6%	66.4%	14.4	96.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	0		1%	%	%	1	.4	.5%	8	.13	.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
	1	2		13.4

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Clark-Exum-Ingles-Novak-Gobert	12	1.13	.83	7	2	0	100
2	Burke-Exum-Novak-Booker-Gobert	9	1.57	1.06	5	2	0	100
3	Exum-Burks-Ingles-Novak-Gobert	6	.31	1.31	-13	0	3	0
4	Burke-Burks-Hayward-Novak-Favors	5	.75	1.40	-5	1	2	33
5	Burke-Hayward-Novak-Booker-Gobert	4	1.22	1.00	4	1	1	50
6	Clark-Exum-Evans-Novak-Kanter	4	1.22	.33	8	1	0	100
7	Burke-Exum-Novak-Kanter-Gobert	4	.50	1.00	-3	0	1	0
8	Burke-Exum-Hayward-Novak-Favors	4	.44	1.38	-7	1	3	25
9	Exum-Millsap-Evans-Novak-Kanter	3	1.00	.50	3	1	0	100
10	Burke-Exum-Hood-Novak-Gobert	3	1.57	.83	6	2	0	100
11	Burke-Hood-Hayward-Novak-Favors	3	1.00	1.50	-3	1	1	50
12	Burke-Millsap-Novak-Kanter-Gobert	2	.50	1.50	-7	0	1	0
13	Burke-Exum-Novak-Favors-Gobert	2	.40	1.33	-6	0	1	0
14	Exum-Millsap-Novak-Kanter-Gobert	2	1.25	1.60	-3	0	1	0
15	Burke-Hood-Hayward-Novak-Kanter	2	1.14	1.57	-3	0	1	0
16	Exum-Hood-Hayward-Novak-Gobert	2	.33	1.50	-7	0	1	0
17	Burke-Hayward-Ingles-Novak-Gobert	2	1.50	1.00	2	1	0	100
18	Exum-Burks-Ingles-Novak-Favors	2	.25	1.20	-5	0	1	0
19	Hood-Hayward-Ingles-Novak-Gobert	2	.00	1.50	-6	0	1	0
20	Clark-Millsap-Hayward-Novak-Favors	2	1.25	1.33	1	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Clark-Exum-Ingles-Novak-Gobert .476 .368 +2 10% 32%   54% +5%

2 Burke-Exum-Novak-Booker-Gobert .474 .333 -4 42% 33%   61% +11%

3 Exum-Burks-Ingles-Novak-Gobert .200 .538 -2 30% 62%   39% -23%

4 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Novak-Favors .333 .700 +2 22% 50%   33% -6%

5 Burke-Hayward-Novak-Booker-Gobert .400 .429 0 30% 29%   54% +3%

6 Clark-Exum-Evans-Novak-Kanter .714 .125 -2 71% 38%   36% 0%

7 Burke-Exum-Novak-Kanter-Gobert .250 .375 -2 0% 50%   40% -11%

8 Burke-Exum-Hayward-Novak-Favors .200 .333 -6 30% 56%   38% -11%

9 Exum-Millsap-Evans-Novak-Kanter .286 .167 +1 71% 50%   60% +16%

10 Burke-Exum-Hood-Novak-Gobert .500 .250 -1 25% 13%   33% 0%

11 Burke-Hood-Hayward-Novak-Favors .429 .600 -4 14% 40%   58% -22%

12 Burke-Millsap-Novak-Kanter-Gobert .200 .500 -6 40% 50%   45% -25%

13 Burke-Exum-Novak-Favors-Gobert .250 .600 0 25% 0%   75% -40%

14 Exum-Millsap-Novak-Kanter-Gobert .400 .500 -1 40% 33%   33% +20%

15 Burke-Hood-Hayward-Novak-Kanter .750 .800 -4 50% 60%   25% -28%

16 Exum-Hood-Hayward-Novak-Gobert .333 .667 -1 33% 50%   50% -50%

17 Burke-Hayward-Ingles-Novak-Gobert .667 .500 +2 33% 50%   50% 0%

18 Exum-Burks-Ingles-Novak-Favors 0 .600 +2 0% 40%   25% -55%

19 Hood-Hayward-Ingles-Novak-Gobert 0 .667 -2 25% 0%   50% 0%

20 Clark-Millsap-Hayward-Novak-Favors .500 .500 +4 50% 25%   25% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF	0%	-1	91.5	92.9	-1.5	1	3	25%
PF	1%	-29	88.3	106.7	-18.3	5	11	31%
C	0%	-1	180.0	196.4	-16.4	1	2	33%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF	18.9	.923	.0	0%	2.9	2.9	1.5	.0	4.4	34.8	30.3
PF	13.7	.571	1.3	0%	9.2	2.0	1.3	.7	6.5	15.7	9.0
C	16.4	.000	.0	0%	.0	16.4	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF 18.9   .462   7.3   23% 11.6   .0   4.4   1.5   2.9   23.2   12.4

PF 15.1   .630   3.9   34% 17.0   3.3   3.3   1.3   3.9   22.2   23.9

C 16.4   1.000   16.4   0% .0   16.4   .0   .0   16.4   32.7   32.5

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF .0 .462 -7.3 -23% -8.7 2.9 2.9 -1.5 -1.5 11.6 17.9

PF -1.3 -.059 -2.6 -34% -7.9 -1.3 2.0 -.7 -2.6 -6.5 -14.8

C .0 -1.000 -16.4 0% .0 .0 .0 .0 16.4 -32.7 -32.5

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
0%	-5	211.8	423.5	%-211.8	2	4	33.3%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 42.4 42.4 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	2	0.0	84.7	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-84.7	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	5	0.0%	40.0%	1	2	50.0%	100.0%	50.0	140.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	%-126.6

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	109	3831	2%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	95.3	107.2	-12.0
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	116.6	106.1	+10.5
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-21.3	+1.2	-22.5
Points Scored	209	7592	-7383
Points Allowed	239	7544	-7305
Net Points	-30	+48	-78
Effective FG%	44.4%	49.5%	-5.1%
Effective FG% Allowed	49.7%	49.1%	+0.6%
Assisted Field Goals	58%	56%	+2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	46%	54%	-8%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	7%	7%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	29.6%	32.1%	-2.5%
Defensive Rebounding	66.4%	72.8%	-6.5%
Total Rebounding	48.0%	52.5%	-4.5%
Stats
Free Throws Made	14	17	-3
Free Throws Attempted	20	23	-3
Free Throws Made by Opp.	20	15	-5
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	28	21	-7
Turnovers, on Offense	17	15	-2
Turnovers, on Defense	10	13	-3
Net Turnovers	-7	-2	+5
Fouls Committed	20	19	-1
Fouls, Drawn	16	19	-3
Net Fouls	-4	0	+4

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts