Al Horford of the Boston Celtics, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Al Horford
Boston Celtics
2017-2018 NBA Season

More Al Horford stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
57%	+349	1.12	1.04	7.5	46	24	65.7

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 5.1 10.5 .489 .553 67% 3% 1.3 12.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 62% .536   73% 1% 7.0

Close 32% .508   52% 9% 3.4

Dunk 6% .977   84% 2% 1.2

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 38% .580   60% 8% 4.6

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 32% .600   65% 4% 4.0

11-15 29% .509   72% 3% 3.1

16-20 25% .537   71% 4% 2.8

21+ 14% .568   58% 3% 1.6

Crunch 39% .548   66% 4% 4.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
94	120	78.3	2.6	2.0	801	48	6.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
146	61	105	27	339	54	6.3	8.9	7.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
103	2168	4.8%	23.0%	427	2388	17.9%	75.3%	22.6	98.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
17	60	2	1%	5%	1%	79	1.7	1.9%	70	1.13	5.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
17	54	56	4	18.6

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Irving-Brown-Tatum-Horford-Baynes	347	1.15	1.02	84	19	15	55
2	Irving-Smart-Brown-Tatum-Horford	147	1.15	1.13	20	18	10	64
3	Irving-Brown-Tatum-Morris-Horford	146	1.09	1.17	-21	9	12	42
4	Rozier-Brown-Tatum-Horford-Baynes	113	1.12	.97	32	6	4	60
5	Irving-Smart-Brown-Morris-Horford	74	1.22	.97	37	9	6	60
6	Irving-Smart-Tatum-Horford-Baynes	69	.99	1.04	-8	2	9	18
7	Rozier-Tatum-Morris-Horford-Baynes	51	1.03	.82	20	4	1	80
8	Irving-Smart-Brown-Horford-Baynes	50	1.18	.82	36	12	2	85
9	Irving-Brown-Tatum-Theis-Horford	49	1.04	1.04	-1	5	5	50
10	Rozier-Irving-Brown-Tatum-Horford	44	1.06	1.00	10	8	6	57
11	Smart-Brown-Tatum-Horford-Baynes	42	1.19	1.00	13	5	1	83
12	Irving-Smart-Brown-Ojeleye-Horford	40	1.27	.99	22	6	4	60
13	Rozier-Irving-Smart-Tatum-Horford	39	1.14	1.00	18	8	4	66
14	Rozier-Smart-Brown-Morris-Horford	34	1.17	.93	20	8	2	80
15	Rozier-Irving-Brown-Morris-Horford	28	1.19	1.13	6	5	3	62
16	Irving-Smart-Tatum-Morris-Horford	25	1.50	1.14	21	7	2	77
17	Rozier-Smart-Brown-Tatum-Horford	24	1.05	.71	22	5	3	62
18	Rozier-Irving-Tatum-Morris-Horford	24	1.25	1.24	9	7	3	70
19	Rozier-Irving-Brown-Horford-Baynes	21	.57	.83	-13	3	5	37
20	Irving-Smart-Tatum-Ojeleye-Horford	21	1.02	.93	1	2	5	28

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Irving-Brown-Tatum-Horford-Baynes .510 .430 -8 34% 30%   50% +1%

2 Irving-Smart-Brown-Tatum-Horford .490 .430 +6 32% 35%   43% 0%

3 Irving-Brown-Tatum-Morris-Horford .460 .480 +7 38% 36%   47% -5%

4 Rozier-Brown-Tatum-Horford-Baynes .470 .410 -10 39% 31%   47% +4%

5 Irving-Smart-Brown-Morris-Horford .470 .380 -6 26% 36%   53% +4%

6 Irving-Smart-Tatum-Horford-Baynes .430 .430 -21 28% 35%   49% -1%

7 Rozier-Tatum-Morris-Horford-Baynes .420 .350 -2 30% 45%   51% -4%

8 Irving-Smart-Brown-Horford-Baynes .480 .370 -4 39% 40%   55% +2%

9 Irving-Brown-Tatum-Theis-Horford .420 .410 -3 38% 41%   46% -1%

10 Rozier-Irving-Brown-Tatum-Horford .450 .350 -4 39% 37%   37% -2%

11 Smart-Brown-Tatum-Horford-Baynes .510 .420 -6 32% 26%   58% -1%

12 Irving-Smart-Brown-Ojeleye-Horford .520 .430 -10 38% 30%   54% +3%

13 Rozier-Irving-Smart-Tatum-Horford .500 .340 -11 35% 31%   44% +2%

14 Rozier-Smart-Brown-Morris-Horford .520 .420 +8 34% 44%   49% -1%

15 Rozier-Irving-Brown-Morris-Horford .460 .440 -3 36% 29%   47% +2%

16 Irving-Smart-Tatum-Morris-Horford .630 .470 +5 23% 38%   47% -5%

17 Rozier-Smart-Brown-Tatum-Horford .480 .320 -3 34% 29%   47% +13%

18 Rozier-Irving-Tatum-Morris-Horford .510 .530 +10 59% 38%   43% +1%

19 Rozier-Irving-Brown-Horford-Baynes .250 .390 0 28% 32%   51% -9%

20 Irving-Smart-Tatum-Ojeleye-Horford .470 .460 0 41% 46%   49% +3%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	24%	+166	104.6	96.3	8.3	39	26	60%
C	32%	+182	110.4	103.5	6.9	45	23	66%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	16.0	.545	2.1	40%	11.7	6.7	2.6	1.1	2.9	19.3	19.4
C	16.3	.559	2.9	36%	11.1	7.7	2.9	2.1	3.0	20.4	21.4

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 18.9 .485 3.7 29% 8.4 2.9 2.5 1.2 2.8 21.1 13.8

C 16.0 .508 4.6 53% 15.1 2.8 2.9 2.0 5.2 19.5 17.9

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -2.8 .060 -1.6 11% 3.2 3.8 -.1 -.1 .0 -1.8 5.6

C .3 .051 -1.6 -17% -4.0 4.9 -.1 .2 2.3 .8 3.6

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
75%	+14	122.8	117.7	5.0	20	15	57.1%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 6.8 12.5 .543 .671 89% 6% 0.7 17.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 66% .717   92% 0% 0.9

Close 31% .545   83% 18% 0.3

Dunk 3% 1.000   100% 0% 0.1

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 34% .583   86% 17% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 26% .611   80% 0% 0.3

11-15 26% .333   100% 0% 0.2

16-20 17% .833   100% 17% 0.3

21+ 31% .909   88% 9% 0.5

Crunch 49% .882   92% 12% 0.8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	7	28.6	2.5	0.7	37	2	5.4%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
6	3	5	2	16	2	8.0	8.2	5.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
7	120	5.8%	19.2%	19	140	13.6%	67.9%	19.4	87.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	3	1	0%	4%	8%	4	1.4	1.6%	5	0.80	6.5

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	2	3	0	17.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2237	1653	57%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.9	105.7	+6.2
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.7	106.3	-1.7
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+7.2	-0.7	+7.9
Points Scored	5030	3499	+1531
Points Allowed	4681	3554	+1127
Net Points	+349	-55	+404
Effective FG%	54.3%	48.4%	+5.8%
Effective FG% Allowed	48.7%	50.6%	-1.9%
Assisted Field Goals	59%	56%	+3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	55%	58%	-3%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	23.0%	27.6%	-4.6%
Defensive Rebounding	75.3%	74.5%	+0.9%
Total Rebounding	49.2%	51.0%	-1.9%
Stats
Free Throws Made	15	17	-2
Free Throws Attempted	19	23	-4
Free Throws Made by Opp.	15	17	+2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	19	23	+4
Turnovers, on Offense	13	14	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	13	15	-2
Net Turnovers	0	1	+1
Fouls Committed	19	20	+1
Fouls, Drawn	18	20	-2
Net Fouls	-1	0	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts