Larry Nance Jr of the Cleveland Cavaliers, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Larry Nance Jr
Cleveland Cavaliers
2017-2018 NBA Season

More Larry Nance Jr stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
12%	+59	1.13	1.06	5.8	15	9	62.5

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 3.7 6.7 .550 .553 80% 6% 1.5 8.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 40% .461   66% 2% 2.5

Close 34% .455   92% 9% 2.1

Dunk 26% .829   82% 7% 2.8

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 60% .615   86% 8% 4.9

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 51% .580   70% 7% 3.9

11-15 26% .573   91% 5% 2.0

16-20 16% .480   92% 4% 1.0

21+ 8% .462   83% 0% .5

Crunch 24% .474   89% 3% 1.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
36	50	72.0	4.9	3.5	180	20	11.1%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
9	6	7	3	25	5	5.0	3.0	2.5

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
53	509	10.4%	22.6%	115	522	22.0%	72.8%	32.4	95.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
7	11		1%	4%	%	18	1.8	2.0%	26	.69	4.5

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
2	5	2	1	22.6

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Hill-Smith-Hood-James-NanceJr.	55	1.14	1.13	0	4	3	57
2	Clarkson-Korver-Hood-Green-NanceJr.	48	1.07	1.00	8	3	2	60
3	Clarkson-Korver-Hood-James-NanceJr.	26	1.20	1.17	-4	3	4	42
4	Hill-Smith-James-Green-NanceJr.	24	1.17	1.13	2	1	2	33
5	Hill-Clarkson-Hood-James-NanceJr.	24	1.30	.92	19	4	1	80
6	Calderon-Hood-James-NanceJr.-Love	21	1.23	1.02	8	2	1	66
7	Calderon-Hill-James-NanceJr.-Love	18	1.15	1.13	2	1	1	50
8	Clarkson-Smith-Hood-James-NanceJr.	17	1.00	1.29	-10	2	3	40
9	Clarkson-Smith-Korver-James-NanceJr.	14	1.23	1.13	4	2	1	66
10	Hill-Hood-James-NanceJr.-Love	13	1.48	1.11	10	2	0	100
11	Clarkson-Hood-James-Green-NanceJr.	12	.82	.85	0	2	2	50
12	Calderon-Clarkson-Smith-James-NanceJr.	12	.88	1.00	-2	1	1	50
13	Clarkson-Korver-James-Green-NanceJr.	11	.83	.58	4	2	1	66
14	Hill-Korver-Hood-James-NanceJr.	11	1.50	1.65	3	2	2	50
15	Clarkson-Korver-Hood-Osman-NanceJr.	11	1.32	1.08	6	2	1	66
16	Clarkson-Smith-James-Green-NanceJr.	10	1.37	1.41	2	3	1	75
17	Clarkson-Korver-Osman-Green-NanceJr.	10	.91	1.00	-1	0	1	0
18	Hill-Clarkson-Smith-James-NanceJr.	8	1.20	1.44	-5	1	2	33
19	Hill-Korver-James-Green-NanceJr.	8	1.37	.53	16	2	0	100
20	Hill-Clarkson-Korver-James-NanceJr.	7	1.00	1.17	-4	1	2	33

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Hill-Smith-Hood-James-NanceJr. .490 .450 -7 26% 30%   42% +5%

2 Clarkson-Korver-Hood-Green-NanceJr. .440 .380 -8 25% 36%   44% +4%

3 Clarkson-Korver-Hood-James-NanceJr. .520 .460 0 29% 39%   42% -4%

4 Hill-Smith-James-Green-NanceJr. .460 .400 -5 35% 38%   48% -6%

5 Hill-Clarkson-Hood-James-NanceJr. .530 .360 -5 18% 27%   51% +6%

6 Calderon-Hood-James-NanceJr.-Love .510 .430 +2 36% 14%   51% +11%

7 Calderon-Hill-James-NanceJr.-Love .460 .480 +2 46% 29%   60% -4%

8 Clarkson-Smith-Hood-James-NanceJr. .420 .520 -6 18% 34%   56% -6%

9 Clarkson-Smith-Korver-James-NanceJr. .500 .460 +4 38% 46%   42% +4%

10 Hill-Hood-James-NanceJr.-Love .640 .480 +6 40% 4%   48% +11%

11 Clarkson-Hood-James-Green-NanceJr. .390 .370 +2 26% 23%   37% 0%

12 Calderon-Clarkson-Smith-James-NanceJr. .330 .460 -1 13% 29%   42% +4%

13 Clarkson-Korver-James-Green-NanceJr. .400 .330 -2 20% 22%   42% +21%

14 Hill-Korver-Hood-James-NanceJr. .650 .710 +2 39% 35%   62% +2%

15 Clarkson-Korver-Hood-Osman-NanceJr. .500 .560 -4 25% 38%   63% +16%

16 Clarkson-Smith-James-Green-NanceJr. .440 .470 +4 28% 24%   41% +6%

17 Clarkson-Korver-Osman-Green-NanceJr. .400 .410 +1 45% 50%   31% +9%

18 Hill-Clarkson-Smith-James-NanceJr. .530 .500 -2 47% 55%   39% -1%

19 Hill-Korver-James-Green-NanceJr. .500 .250 +6 36% 50%   42% +6%

20 Hill-Clarkson-Korver-James-NanceJr. .440 .570 -3 38% 36%   47% +5%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	2%	+25	112.3	99.3	13.0	5	3	62%
C	10%	+33	110.4	106.4	4.0	12	12	50%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	15.0	.550	6.0	60%	17.5	1.5	2.0	1.0	4.0	20.1	22.0
C	15.9	.554	4.6	60%	16.2	2.7	.7	2.0	6.1	21.1	25.9

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 19.6 .590 3.5 25% 12.5 3.5 2.0 .5 2.0 24.6 23.3

C 19.4 .579 5.7 58% 15.9 3.9 2.9 .7 4.5 26.4 26.9

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -4.5 -.040 2.5 35% 5.0 -2.0 .0 .5 -2.0 -4.5 -1.3

C -3.5 -.025 -1.1 2% .4 -1.2 2.2 1.2 -1.6 -5.3 -1.0

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
8%	-4	127.7	142.7	-15.0	2	2	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 11.3 15.0 .750 .750 100% 0% 7.5 30.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 50% .500   100% 0% 0.3

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 50% 1.000   100% 0% 0.7

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 50% 1.000   100% 0% 0.7

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 50% .500   100% 0% 0.3

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 50% 1.000   100% 0% 0.7

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 75% .667   67% 0% 0.7

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	2	100.0	7.5	7.5	4	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	1	0	0	1	0	1.0	-3.8	3.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
2	15	13.3%	33.3%	3	11	27.3%	72.7%	40.6	106.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	0	0	8%	0%	0%	1	3.8	4.0%	1	1.00	8.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-3.6

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	488	3372	12%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	112.2	114.6	-2.4
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.6	113.9	-7.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+5.6	+0.7	+5.0
Points Scored	1128	7963	-6835
Points Allowed	1069	7945	-6876
Net Points	+59	+18	+41
Effective FG%	52.6%	55.0%	-2.4%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.2%	54.5%	-4.3%
Assisted Field Goals	59%	57%	+2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	59%	62%	-3%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	4%	+1%
Shots Blocked	5%	4%	+1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	22.6%	23.5%	-0.9%
Defensive Rebounding	72.8%	74.8%	-2.0%
Total Rebounding	47.7%	49.1%	-1.4%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	18	-2
Free Throws Attempted	20	24	-4
Free Throws Made by Opp.	16	14	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	21	19	-2
Turnovers, on Offense	11	14	+3
Turnovers, on Defense	15	13	+2
Net Turnovers	4	-1	-5
Fouls Committed	19	18	-1
Fouls, Drawn	19	21	-2
Net Fouls	0	3	+3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts