Terry Rozier of the Charlotte Hornets, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Terry Rozier
Charlotte Hornets
2019-2020 NBA Season

More Terry Rozier stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
68%	-396	1.07	1.17	-8.9	18	45	28.6

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 6.3 14.9 .423 .514 53% 5% 2.6 18.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 73% .519   62% 1% 11.3

Close 26% .494   32% 15% 3.9

Dunk 1% .750   67% 13% .2

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 27% .502   34% 15% 4.1

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 44% .537   53% 6% 7.1

11-15 26% .498   54% 5% 3.8

16-20 18% .488   57% 4% 2.7

21+ 12% .504   44% 2% 1.8

Crunch 30% .495   52% 3% 4.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
166	191	86.9	4.3	3.7	1006	65	6.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
109	39	65	45	258	63	4.1	7.5	5.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
50	2285	2.2%	26.3%	226	2081	10.9%	72.6%	13.0	99.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
5	5		%	%	%	10	.2	.3%	49	.20	.5

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
20	63	58		17.7

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Washington-Zeller	278	1.11	1.11	9	18	16	52
2	Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Washington-Biyombo	259	1.06	1.12	-32	8	16	33
3	Rozier-Bacon-Bridges-Washington-Zeller	91	.92	1.19	-53	3	10	23
4	Rozier-Monk-Bridges-Washington-Zeller	43	.92	1.09	-14	6	8	42
5	Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Williams-Zeller	37	.92	1.41	-31	1	9	10
6	Rozier-Graham-Monk-Bridges-Zeller	36	1.17	1.22	0	5	5	50
7	Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Batum-Biyombo	34	1.16	1.20	-4	2	3	40
8	Rozier-Graham-Bacon-Bridges-Washington	30	.98	1.14	-12	3	5	37
9	Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Biyombo-Zeller	28	.83	1.21	-21	0	3	0
10	Rozier-Graham-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Washington	28	1.26	1.16	5	4	6	40
11	Rozier-Graham-Cody.Martin-Washington-Zeller	26	1.20	1.40	-14	3	6	33
12	Rozier-Graham-Batum-Washington-Zeller	26	1.12	1.02	8	4	3	57
13	Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Williams-Biyombo	26	.94	1.61	-39	2	9	18
14	Rozier-Graham-Bacon-Washington-Zeller	26	.80	1.30	-28	3	8	27
15	Rozier-Graham-Cody.Martin-Williams-Zeller	24	1.25	1.20	1	4	2	66
16	Rozier-Monk-Bacon-Bridges-Zeller	23	1.17	1.22	0	5	5	50
17	Rozier-Monk-Cody.Martin-Williams-Zeller	23	1.00	1.04	-1	4	2	66
18	Rozier-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Washington-Zeller	23	1.29	1.02	11	3	2	60
19	Rozier-Graham-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Zeller	21	1.44	1.30	3	3	5	37
20	Rozier-Bacon-Bridges-Washington-Biyombo	20	1.41	1.37	3	3	4	42

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Washington-Zeller .450 .480 +35 40% 35%   50% +2%

2 Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Washington-Biyombo .450 .470 +13 39% 42%   51% -7%

3 Rozier-Bacon-Bridges-Washington-Zeller .380 .530 +3 36% 42%   48% -5%

4 Rozier-Monk-Bridges-Washington-Zeller .440 .430 -3 35% 32%   44% -7%

5 Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Williams-Zeller .430 .600 -5 40% 29%   54% -11%

6 Rozier-Graham-Monk-Bridges-Zeller .430 .430 +6 34% 28%   45% +1%

7 Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Batum-Biyombo .460 .510 +5 34% 39%   41% +11%

8 Rozier-Graham-Bacon-Bridges-Washington .400 .500 -1 36% 38%   49% +8%

9 Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Biyombo-Zeller .390 .510 +1 41% 33%   53% -13%

10 Rozier-Graham-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Washington .530 .420 -14 40% 27%   43% +5%

11 Rozier-Graham-Cody.Martin-Washington-Zeller .490 .560 +6 47% 36%   53% -8%

12 Rozier-Graham-Batum-Washington-Zeller .430 .500 +1 14% 41%   47% +6%

13 Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Williams-Biyombo .480 .600 -9 40% 42%   42% -13%

14 Rozier-Graham-Bacon-Washington-Zeller .300 .590 +6 48% 47%   42% -6%

15 Rozier-Graham-Cody.Martin-Williams-Zeller .450 .600 +7 40% 27%   63% +10%

16 Rozier-Monk-Bacon-Bridges-Zeller .480 .530 0 39% 51%   35% +9%

17 Rozier-Monk-Cody.Martin-Williams-Zeller .460 .500 +7 45% 43%   51% -2%

18 Rozier-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Washington-Zeller .560 .490 -2 44% 30%   64% +2%

19 Rozier-Graham-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Zeller .480 .570 -7 24% 32%   67% +5%

20 Rozier-Bacon-Bridges-Washington-Biyombo .640 .510 -4 44% 35%   42% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	68%	-396	102.6	111.5	-8.9	18	45	28%
SG
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	21.2	.514	4.3	27%	6.2	5.8	3.2	.2	2.8	25.6	19.4
SG
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 17.7 .501 3.9 30% 5.6 8.8 3.0 .5 3.5 21.0 23.1

SG

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 3.5 .013 .5 -3% .6 -3.0 -.2 -.2 .7 4.6 -3.7

SG

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
90%	+21	116.3	108.7	7.6	15	15	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 13.0 23.5 .554 .669 47% 2% 9.4 40.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 65% .655   65% 0% 1.8

Close 35% .696   25% 4% 1.1

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 35% .696   25% 4% 1.1

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 34% .909   50% 0% 1.3

11-15 29% .395   29% 5% 0.5

16-20 23% .733   44% 0% 0.7

21+ 14% .556   75% 0% 0.3

Crunch 37% .667   54% 0% 1.1

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
26	32	81.3	11.6	9.4	68	3	4.4%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
6	1	0	1	8	5	1.6	0.4	2.9

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
2	117	1.7%	26.5%	19	135	14.1%	71.9%	15.8	98.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	3	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	5	3	0	9.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2128	964	68%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.6	110.0	-3.4
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	116.1	110.3	+5.8
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-9.5	-0.3	-9.2
Points Scored	4549	2138	+2411
Points Allowed	4945	2181	+2764
Net Points	-396	-43	-353
Effective FG%	49.9%	51.6%	-1.7%
Effective FG% Allowed	55.4%	53.0%	+2.4%
Assisted Field Goals	65%	60%	+5%
Assisted FG% Allowed	64%	63%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Shots Blocked	4%	4%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	26.3%	28.0%	-1.6%
Defensive Rebounding	72.6%	70.5%	+2.1%
Total Rebounding	49.5%	49.2%	+0.2%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	16	+0
Free Throws Attempted	21	22	-1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	14	13	-1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	18	18	+0
Turnovers, on Offense	14	14	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	13	16	-3
Net Turnovers	-1	2	+3
Fouls Committed	19	18	-1
Fouls, Drawn	19	22	-3
Net Fouls	0	4	+4

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts