Devonte' Graham of the Charlotte Hornets, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Devonte' Graham
Charlotte Hornets
2020-2021 NBA Season

More Devonte' Graham stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
47%	+98	1.13	1.12	2.9	30	24	55.6

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 4.6 12.2 .377 .510 66% 3% 2.4 14.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 91% .520   69% 2% 11.5

Close 9% .404   39% 23% .8

Dunk 0% 1.000   0% 0% .0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 9% .414   38% 22% .9

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 46% .549   66% 4% 6.2

11-15 23% .517   63% 3% 2.8

16-20 18% .426   73% 3% 1.9

21+ 13% .483   68% 5% 1.5

Crunch 31% .450   71% 4% 3.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
133	158	84.2	4.7	3.9	723	54	7.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
123	35	83	54	295	52	5.7	12.9	8.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
22	1717	1.3%	25.9%	126	1651	7.6%	73.6%	8.9	99.5

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	5		%	1%	%	6	.2	.2%	31	.19	.5

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
2	52	30		30.7

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Graham-Rozier-Hayward-Washington-Biyombo	254	1.02	1.13	-52	9	14	39
2	Graham-Rozier-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Washington	80	1.38	1.16	40	8	3	72
3	Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Washington-McDaniels	65	1.04	1.11	-3	3	4	42
4	Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Hayward-Washington	64	1.23	.93	49	14	4	77
5	Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Hayward-Biyombo	60	.98	1.02	-12	7	8	46
6	Graham-Rozier-Hayward-Washington-Zeller	51	1.26	1.17	12	4	2	66
7	Graham-Ball-Caleb.Martin-Bridges-Washington	43	1.03	1.20	-15	4	6	40
8	Graham-Rozier-Ball-Bridges-Washington	31	1.18	1.22	0	3	5	37
9	Graham-Rozier-Ball-Bridges-Biyombo	26	1.02	1.09	-5	3	5	37
10	Graham-Rozier-Bridges-McDaniels-Biyombo	24	1.15	1.23	-4	3	4	42
11	Graham-Rozier-Bridges-McDaniels-Zeller	24	1.14	1.20	-3	2	5	28
12	Graham-Monk-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Zeller	22	1.33	1.14	3	2	2	50
13	Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Washington-Biyombo	21	1.40	1.26	6	3	1	75
14	Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Hayward-Zeller	21	1.37	1.18	10	4	3	57
15	Graham-Ball-Bridges-Hayward-Zeller	20	1.29	.98	13	4	0	100
16	Graham-Rozier-Ball-Hayward-Zeller	19	1.42	1.05	17	2	0	100
17	Graham-Ball-Bridges-Hayward-Washington	19	1.03	1.15	-5	3	5	37
18	Graham-Rozier-Ball-Bridges-Zeller	18	1.18	1.08	4	3	2	60
19	Graham-Wanamaker-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Zeller	18	1.12	.81	12	3	3	50
20	Graham-Caleb.Martin-Bridges-McDaniels-Biyombo	17	1.10	.78	8	2	1	66

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Graham-Rozier-Hayward-Washington-Biyombo .420 .470 +20 33% 32%   49% 0%

2 Graham-Rozier-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Washington .540 .490 -15 32% 42%   46% +4%

3 Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Washington-McDaniels .410 .420 -5 22% 30%   43% +1%

4 Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Hayward-Washington .490 .360 +16 33% 31%   47% +4%

5 Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Hayward-Biyombo .420 .420 -13 26% 33%   49% -5%

6 Graham-Rozier-Hayward-Washington-Zeller .450 .460 +5 26% 33%   54% +6%

7 Graham-Ball-Caleb.Martin-Bridges-Washington .360 .570 +2 30% 42%   50% +9%

8 Graham-Rozier-Ball-Bridges-Washington .410 .440 +2 42% 37%   52% -2%

9 Graham-Rozier-Ball-Bridges-Biyombo .420 .550 +3 29% 45%   49% +4%

10 Graham-Rozier-Bridges-McDaniels-Biyombo .450 .540 -7 22% 53%   43% +8%

11 Graham-Rozier-Bridges-McDaniels-Zeller .470 .530 0 28% 28%   51% +4%

12 Graham-Monk-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Zeller .420 .470 +9 37% 16%   60% +3%

13 Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Washington-Biyombo .510 .460 -4 20% 34%   51% -4%

14 Graham-Rozier-Bridges-Hayward-Zeller .440 .510 +13 25% 38%   54% -2%

15 Graham-Ball-Bridges-Hayward-Zeller .560 .440 -1 42% 28%   62% +4%

16 Graham-Rozier-Ball-Hayward-Zeller .630 .450 +4 45% 35%   51% -4%

17 Graham-Ball-Bridges-Hayward-Washington .390 .470 +2 44% 33%   42% +10%

18 Graham-Rozier-Ball-Bridges-Zeller .490 .410 -2 32% 32%   51% -5%

19 Graham-Wanamaker-Cody.Martin-Bridges-Zeller .470 .500 +13 37% 23%   51% +21%

20 Graham-Caleb.Martin-Bridges-McDaniels-Biyombo .430 .370 +2 40% 33%   59% -4%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	47%	+97	111.3	108.4	2.9	30	23	56%
SG
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	19.8	.510	4.7	8%	4.4	8.7	2.5	.2	2.3	24.2	18.3
SG
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 18.9 .481 3.0 29% 6.3 8.2 3.4 .5 3.5 20.5 18.4

SG

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG .9 .029 1.7 -21% -1.9 .5 .9 -.3 1.2 3.6 -.1

SG

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
69%	+54	124.3	87.8	36.5	16	9	64.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 9.5 20.9 .452 .645 64% 3% 6.8 33.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 94% .621   75% 3% 1.4

Close 6% 1.000   0% 0% 0.2

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 6% 1.000   0% 0% 0.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 58% .778   70% 0% 1.1

11-15 19% .250   0% 17% 0.1

16-20 16% .900   67% 0% 0.3

21+ 6% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 23% .643   50% 0% 0.3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
10	11	90.9	7.4	6.8	33	2	6.1%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
3	4	4	0	11	2	5.5	7.4	7.4

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
3	71	4.2%	35.2%	4	69	5.8%	81.2%	10.0	116.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	2	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	2	4	0	14.4

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1621	1779	47%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	113.0	110.8	+2.3
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.3	116.6	-5.4
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+1.8	-5.9	+7.6
Points Scored	3761	4120	-359
Points Allowed	3663	4357	-694
Net Points	+98	-237	+335
Effective FG%	53.2%	53.3%	-0.1%
Effective FG% Allowed	53.6%	56.3%	-2.8%
Assisted Field Goals	71%	63%	+8%
Assisted FG% Allowed	65%	65%	+0%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	25.9%	26.8%	-0.9%
Defensive Rebounding	73.6%	73.1%	+0.5%
Total Rebounding	49.7%	49.9%	-0.2%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	15	+1
Free Throws Attempted	21	20	+1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	14	14	+0
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	19	19	+0
Turnovers, on Offense	14	15	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	15	14	+1
Net Turnovers	1	-1	-2
Fouls Committed	17	19	+2
Fouls, Drawn	19	18	+1
Net Fouls	2	-1	-3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts