Khem Birch of the Toronto Raptors, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Khem Birch
Toronto Raptors
2020-2021 NBA Season

More Khem Birch stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
16%	-20	1.14	1.16	-1.7	8	11	42.1

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 5.0 9.0 .556 .582 82% 5% 1.5 11.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 60% .510   77% 1% 5.5

Close 25% .548   83% 14% 2.4

Dunk 15% .923   92% 4% 2.5

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 40% .691   87% 10% 4.9

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 40% .616   69% 6% 4.5

11-15 30% .588   96% 6% 3.2

16-20 20% .529   88% 3% 1.9

21+ 10% .529   88% 0% .9

Crunch 30% .529   88% 2% 2.8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
28	44	63.6	3.7	2.4	195	24	12.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
21	7	6	2	36	4	9.0	3.4	3.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
57	612	9.3%	24.5%	87	538	16.2%	77.0%	25.5	101.5

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	18		1%	7%	%	22	1.9	2.2%	28	.79	5.8

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
5	4	12		10.8

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Lowry-VanVleet-Anunoby-Siakam-Birch	89	1.24	1.02	41	3	0	100
2	Flynn-Johnson-Bembry-Gillespie-Birch	31	1.16	1.24	-5	1	1	50
3	Flynn-VanVleet-Anunoby-Siakam-Birch	27	1.06	1.22	-6	0	1	0
4	VanVleet-TrentJr.-Johnson-Siakam-Birch	27	1.28	1.18	7	1	0	100
5	VanVleet-Johnson-Watanabe-Siakam-Birch	24	1.04	1.32	-14	0	1	0
6	Flynn-TrentJr.-Johnson-Boucher-Birch	20	1.00	1.21	-8	0	2	0
7	Flynn-Lowry-Anunoby-Siakam-Birch	18	1.22	1.16	0	1	2	33
8	Flynn-VanVleet-Watson-Boucher-Birch	18	1.26	1.17	2	1	0	100
9	Flynn-Anunoby-Siakam-Boucher-Birch	17	1.22	1.21	-2	0	1	0
10	Flynn-TrentJr.-Watson-Boucher-Birch	15	1.17	.91	9	1	0	100
11	Flynn-Lowry-Johnson-Siakam-Birch	14	.90	1.12	-9	0	2	0
12	Flynn-TrentJr.-Watanabe-Siakam-Birch	12	1.00	1.35	-8	0	1	0
13	Flynn-Johnson-Bembry-Birch-Baynes	10	1.36	1.19	5	3	0	100
14	Flynn-TrentJr.-Watanabe-Boucher-Birch	9	1.26	1.09	4	1	0	100
15	Flynn-Harris-Bembry-Gillespie-Birch	9	1.05	1.48	-8	0	1	0
16	Flynn-Harris-Johnson-Gillespie-Birch	9	.53	1.42	-17	0	2	0
17	Flynn-Harris-Johnson-Bembry-Birch	8	1.16	.84	6	1	0	100
18	Hood-Watanabe-Siakam-Gillespie-Birch	8	.93	1.00	-2	0	1	0
19	Flynn-Hood-Bembry-Watanabe-Birch	7	1.15	.60	6	3	0	100
20	Harris-Johnson-Bembry-Gillespie-Birch	7	1.08	1.50	-7	0	1	0

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Lowry-VanVleet-Anunoby-Siakam-Birch .490 .460 0 35% 27%   53% +8%

2 Flynn-Johnson-Bembry-Gillespie-Birch .430 .600 +5 33% 34%   52% +15%

3 Flynn-VanVleet-Anunoby-Siakam-Birch .420 .560 -2 18% 18%   50% +10%

4 VanVleet-TrentJr.-Johnson-Siakam-Birch .520 .430 -10 28% 44%   43% 0%

5 VanVleet-Johnson-Watanabe-Siakam-Birch .420 .580 -2 33% 34%   57% +1%

6 Flynn-TrentJr.-Johnson-Boucher-Birch .380 .530 -4 27% 30%   35% +18%

7 Flynn-Lowry-Anunoby-Siakam-Birch .600 .490 +3 37% 31%   38% -1%

8 Flynn-VanVleet-Watson-Boucher-Birch .490 .500 -2 30% 37%   55% +5%

9 Flynn-Anunoby-Siakam-Boucher-Birch .470 .440 -6 31% 34%   54% -3%

10 Flynn-TrentJr.-Watson-Boucher-Birch .390 .370 -6 33% 37%   63% +9%

11 Flynn-Lowry-Johnson-Siakam-Birch .400 .480 -2 12% 42%   54% -16%

12 Flynn-TrentJr.-Watanabe-Siakam-Birch .320 .610 0 16% 26%   65% -4%

13 Flynn-Johnson-Bembry-Birch-Baynes .440 .400 +5 13% 24%   49% 0%

14 Flynn-TrentJr.-Watanabe-Boucher-Birch .400 .500 +4 15% 28%   57% +8%

15 Flynn-Harris-Bembry-Gillespie-Birch .590 .630 -6 41% 13%   36% -4%

16 Flynn-Harris-Johnson-Gillespie-Birch .210 .440 -9 21% 31%   54% -10%

17 Flynn-Harris-Johnson-Bembry-Birch .530 .410 +6 40% 35%   42% +16%

18 Hood-Watanabe-Siakam-Gillespie-Birch .430 .410 0 7% 47%   59% -20%

19 Flynn-Hood-Bembry-Watanabe-Birch .550 .230 -3 18% 15%   55% -17%

20 Harris-Johnson-Bembry-Gillespie-Birch .500 .600 +1 25% 40%   42% -7%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	0%	+1	128.5	125.4	3.1	2	1	66%
C	15%	-23	112.2	114.2	-2.0	8	11	42%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	10.8	.571	3.1	42%	15.5	1.5	3.1	.0	3.1	15.5	14.7
C	14.7	.582	3.8	39%	12.0	3.1	1.7	2.0	3.9	19.4	21.1

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 21.7 .500 .0 35% 12.4 1.5 3.1 1.5 7.7 21.7 11.6

C 14.8 .561 3.9 53% 15.0 2.9 2.2 1.9 4.4 19.6 21.0

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -10.8 .071 3.1 7% 3.1 .0 .0 -1.5 4.6 -6.2 3.1

C -.1 .022 -.1 -14% -3.0 .3 .5 .1 .4 -.2 .2

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
23%	-7	107.7	120.2	-12.6	4	4	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 1.8 5.4 .333 .333 100% 0% 0.0 3.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 67% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 33% 1.000   100% 0% 0.3

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 33% 1.000   100% 0% 0.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 67% .500   100% 0% 0.3

11-15 33% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 67% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	1.8	0.0	3	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	1	0.0	-3.6	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
2	33	6.1%	27.3%	2	25	8.0%	72.0%	14.1	99.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	3	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-3.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	566	2829	16%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	114.8	112.9	+1.9
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	116.2	113.9	+2.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-1.4	-1.0	-0.3
Points Scored	1336	6675	-5339
Points Allowed	1356	6689	-5333
Net Points	-20	-14	-6
Effective FG%	53.5%	52.8%	+0.6%
Effective FG% Allowed	56.7%	53.8%	+2.9%
Assisted Field Goals	62%	60%	+2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	64%	67%	-3%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	24.5%	24.0%	+0.5%
Defensive Rebounding	77.0%	71.8%	+5.2%
Total Rebounding	50.7%	47.9%	+2.8%
Stats
Free Throws Made	15	18	-3
Free Throws Attempted	20	21	-1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	20	+2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	25	+3
Turnovers, on Offense	11	13	+2
Turnovers, on Defense	15	16	-1
Net Turnovers	4	3	-1
Fouls Committed	18	22	+4
Fouls, Drawn	17	20	-3
Net Fouls	-1	-2	-1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts