Roland NBA Physicality Report

NBA 2025 Finals — OKLAHOMA CITY vs INDIANA


Quick Overview

  • Oklahoma City won the physicality on a game by game basis 4-3. They also took the "playing hard energy" wins by the same 4-3 margin.

  • The team with the better Physicality score was 5-2, while the team with the most "Playing Hard Wins" was 7-0.

  • Shai led all players with 226 Physicality Wins, followed by Siakam (164), Turner (140), Holmgren (134) and Jalen Williams (132). Siakam led in Net Wins with +33. Hartenstein led in Net Wins per 36 min.

  • Siakam was the top "playing hard energy plays" leader with 63 PH Wins, followed by Caruso (55), Holmgren (52), Haliburton (47), and Nembhard (43).

  • Siakam dominated Jalen Williams Head-to-Head (+19 wins), while Shai was +20 net wins against the five IND starters (only losing H2H to Siakam).



Team Physicality Series Summary

Winner: -draw-

The Thunder with +2 physicality wins, +5 knockdowns. Pacers had 34 more level 2+ force plays (+8 Level 2+ wins). Neither team with a clear overall advantage.

Team
RPR*
Wins
L/D
L2+
Falls
KD
OKLAHOMA CITY
2153.3
876
155
197
178
183
INDIANA
2165.9
874
172
231
183
178

Tracking over forty types of contact, aggression, and resilience

Header notes:
RPR = "Roland Physicality Rating" (in development), Wins = a Physicality play that is deemed a 'win', L/D = Losses/Defeats (non-intentional fouls and soft plays), L2+ = level 2 or higher force physicality plays, Falls = player hits the ground, KD = Knockdowns: causes opponent to hit the ground



Game by Game

The physicality winner was 5-2 in winning the actual game, the playing hard effort plays winner was 7-0.

Game
Physicality Edge
Team Physicality Stats
Top Players
1
OKLAHOMA CITY
+8 Wins, +28 RPR
-8 Knockdowns
"PH Wins" IND +11
  Turner +9 wins
  Shai +6
  .....Jalen W. -7
  PH: Siakam 12 Wins
2
OKLAHOMA CITY
+14 Wins, +29 RPR
+8 Knockdowns
"PH Wins" OKC +5
  Shai +19 wins
  Turner +9
  .....Jalen W. -7
  PH: Siakam 12 Wins
3
INDIANA
+30 Wins, +81 RPR
-4 Knockdowns
"PH Wins" IND +12
  Siakam +19 wins
  Turner +5
  .....Nesmith -10
  PH: McConnell 9 Wins
4
OKLAHOMA CITY
+13 Wins, +35 RPR
+8 Knockdowns
"PH Wins" OKC +5
  Holmgren +11 wins
  Hartenstein +7
  .....Sheppard -9
  PH: Siakam 14 Wins
5
INDIANA
+9 Wins, +29 RPR
-3 Knockdowns
"PH Wins" OKC +1
  Turner +10 wins
  Shai +7
  .....Nembhard -8
  PH: Jalen W. 15 Wins
6
INDIANA
+9 Wins, +28 RPR
+9 Knockdowns
"PH Wins" IND +37
  Nembhard +9 wins
  McConnell +7
  .....Shai -7
  PH: Siakam 15 Wins
7
OKLAHOMA CITY
+15 Wins, +35 RPR
-2 Knockdowns
"PH Wins" OKC +19
  Shai +10 wins
  Mathurin +6
  .....Nembhard -10
  PH: Caruso 12 Wins
  Physicality = "Player vs Opposing Player contact plays"
  Playing Hard = distinct from physicality, "non contact/light contact effort plays"


  • Shai was in the top2 for "net physicality wins" in four games, and had the most Physicality Wins (226) for the series. Turner also made it four times into the top2.

  • Siakam was the top "playing hard energy plays" leader in four games, and had the most PH Wins (63) for the series. The top PH Wins per 36min players were McConnell 10.6, Caruso 9.8, Siakam 9.7.


Player Physicality Stats

Over 40 different forms of physical contact, with both the player initiating and the player receiving the contact. From this can be calculated all kinds of stats, ratings, and nuance. Still learning about the way these stats influence winning. More to come!!

OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER

Per 36 Minute stats
Player
Wins
Net Wins
RPR
Wins
L2+
Net Wins
Isaiah Hartenstein
99
+30
71.7
26.6
9.1
+8.1
Chet Holmgren
134
+24
57.2
22.8
4.2
+4.1
Shai
226
+30
73.8
30.5
4.6
+4.0
Kenrich Williams
15
+2
23.9
9.8
0.7
+1.3
Jalen Williams
132
-10
46.7
19.6
3.6
-1.5
Luguentz Dort
70
-14
31.1
11.5
6.1
-2.3
Aaron Wiggins
39
-8
31.6
14.0
2.2
-2.9
Cason Wallace
64
-15
33.3
14.8
3.2
-3.5
Alex Caruso
63
-29
26.6
11.2
2.5
-5.2


INDIANA PACERS

Per 36 Minute stats
Player
Wins
Net Wins
RPR
Wins
L2+
Net Wins
Myles Turner
140
+29
69.9
26.5
9.7
+5.5
Pascal Siakam
164
+33
65.2
25.2
7.1
+5.1
T.J. McConnell
83
+14
50.3
21.0
3.5
+3.5
Obi Toppin
71
-2
38.6
15.4
3.5
-0.4
Bennedict Mathurin
77
-4
48.5
19.3
6.5
-1.0
Tyrese Haliburton
75
-15
29.7
12.9
1.2
-2.6
Andrew Nembhard
108
-19
39.6
16.4
3.0
-2.9
Aaron Nesmith
83
-23
39.0
15.8
6.1
-4.4
Ben Sheppard
23
-20
21.0
8.7
3.0
-7.6



Player Head-to-Head Physicality Matchups

Isolating on "Physicality Matchups", the four biggest matchup "net wins" were all won by Indiana. OKC held the advantage in 11 of the top 20.

Edge Winner Loser
Net Wins
IND Siakam JalenW
19
IND Turner Dort
17
IND Turner Wallace
13
IND Siakam Dort
12
OKC Holmgren Nesmith
11
OKC Gilgeous-Alexander Turner
10
OKC Gilgeous-Alexander Nesmith
10
OKC JalenW Mathurin
10
IND Siakam Gilgeous-Alexander
8
OKC Gilgeous-Alexander Toppin
8
OKC Hartenstein Nembhard
8
IND McConnell Joe
8
IND Siakam Caruso
7
OKC Gilgeous-Alexander Sheppard
7
IND McConnell Gilgeous-Alexander
7
OKC Hartenstein Bryant
7
OKC Holmgren Nembhard
6
OKC Gilgeous-Alexander Nembhard
6
OKC Dort Nembhard
6
IND Mathurin Caruso
6

While it's to be expected that bigger/stronger players will have the physicality edge against smaller players, there were some key matchups in the series:
  • Siakam-Jalen Williams -- Siakam had a 39-20 wins lead head to head, although Jalen had 9 knockdowns (tied for the most in a matchup).

  • Siakam/Turner-Dort -- Both the IND starting bigs put some physicality wins on Dort, although Lu's limited role on offense can make it tough for him to stack physical wins.

  • Shai-IND starters -- Shai won the H2H against all but Siakam and was +20 net physicality wins versus the starting five, including besting Turner by 10 net wins. In addition he had five of the top 20 biggest matchup wins (although two defeats).

Physicality as a Foundation—Not Yet a Final Word

Right now I don't have the sample size to make bold statements. Working with a team —and able to eventually pull similar tracking for every game of the season using Hawkeye data— would allow for two full seasons of analysis! This dataset raises more questions than answers perhaps.
  • Why were the "Playing Hard" wins seemingly so significant? (the team with the better game score was 7-0) Are there certain sub-categories of PH Wins that are especially telling to the outcome of games (and regualr season vs playoff differences)?

  • Should teams put more emphasis on the Hard Play guys in roster construction? (And shout-out to all the important UNDRAFTED hustle players in this series: Dort, Caruso, McConnell -- pay attention for the next Vegas Summer League breakouts! )

  • Will other teams seek to up their ball pressure/swipes at the ball seeing the OKC success and runaway turnover edge numbers? Is this a skill that can be coached up, or does OKC have players who are especially well suited to the job?

  • Can we identify player archetypes —like Siakam— who consistently challenge certain players like a Jalen Williams on a physicality front? Is there consistency in head to head physicality dominance?

  • We expect bigs to dole out some heavy level 2+ force plays, but does having wing players who also bring higher magnitudes of force carry extra juice in the playoffs? Dort, Nesmith, and Mathurin all posted a high number of Level 2+ plays given their position.

  • Shai's performance was masterful but how dependent is he on current officiating? His go-to "clear out space for a jumper with his forearm shove" never got whistled for an offensive foul or a travel (He was called for 4 Off-fouls in the series, 2 on setting screens, 1 on a drive where he swung his arm into Nembhard's face, and another offball getting trying to get free of Nembhard when he swung his elbow -- the first possession of game three!)

We don’t have those answers yet, but the tagging framework is built to find them.

What Kind of Physicality Wins?

Early tracking data reveals some trends in what actually moves the needle:
  • Physicality Rating (RPR): Teams winning this stat won the game 68% of the time.
  • Total Physicality Wins: 66% game win rate.
  • Level 2+ Force Plays: Just 47% win rate. May suggest over-aggression backfires, or things aren't "coming easy" so trying to achieve something difficult with pure force.
  • Ballhandler Pressure/Swipes at Ball: 77% win rate. A key OKC weapon.
  • Screening battles—setting and fighting over: 67% win rate.
  • "Grabs, bumps, pushes, chucks, and get-free's": 63% win rate.
Some areas like falls and knockdowns aren’t seemingly predictive, but may become more meaningful with more nuance as larger datasets emerge.

The early takeaway? Smart, sustained pressure and toughness in key actions—not just brute force—tend to correlate with winning. These are the building blocks of tactical physicality.

Addendum: Player Physicality stats (original format)

OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER

Player
RPR*
Plays
Wins
L
L2+
Falls
KD
Gilgeous-Alexander
547.2
323
226
24
34
35
33
Holmgren
336.8
205
134
15
25
17
30
Jalen.Williams
315.2
193
132
24
24
16
30
Hartenstein
266.8
159
99
11
34
24
23
Dort
190.2
153
70
25
37
28
25
Caruso
149.0
122
63
20
14
24
17
Wallace
144.5
106
64
19
14
12
9
Wiggins
87.8
51
39
8
6
11
6
K.Williams
36.5
16
15
0
1
1
3
Joe
28.5
24
12
5
3
5
6


...OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER "physicality suffered"

Player
xRPR*
Plays
Agn
Wins
Agn
L2+
Agn
Gilgeous-Alexander
523.8
333
196
31
Holmgren
306.8
173
110
35
Jalen.Williams
382.2
249
142
28
Hartenstein
205.8
123
69
25
Dort
254.0
148
84
35
Caruso
271.5
158
92
36
Wallace
210.8
111
79
19
Wiggins
121.5
60
47
7
K.Williams
34.0
18
13
3
Joe
56.8
25
21
6

Analysis:

  • Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led all players in RPR and Wins, as well as the highest by far physicality suffered of the series.


INDIANA PACERS

Player
RPR*
Plays
Wins
L
L2+
Falls
KD
Siakam
424.0
238
164
19
46
42
38
Turner
369.0
236
140
24
51
8
30
Nembhard
260.8
179
108
19
20
22
17
Nesmith
204.5
162
83
32
32
41
28
McConnell
198.5
112
83
12
14
19
17
Mathurin
193.8
121
77
16
26
22
15
Toppin
177.8
125
71
12
16
4
13
Haliburton
173.0
118
75
10
7
15
3
Sheppard
55.5
60
23
11
8
5
6
Bradley
53.0
30
24
6
4
2
5

...INDIANA PACERS "physicality suffered"

Player
xRPR*
Plays
Agn
Wins
Agn
L2+
Agn
Siakam
375.0
216
131
38
Turner
291.0
172
111
22
Nembhard
341.8
211
127
24
Nesmith
306.8
153
106
36
McConnell
180.8
93
69
10
Mathurin
226.5
142
81
18
Toppin
193.2
113
73
17
Haliburton
242.2
151
90
17
Sheppard
110.8
69
43
5
Bradley
37.8
19
14
4

Analysis:

  • Pascal Siakam put together a strong physicality series, and also collected the most "playing hard non-contact effort wins" of any player. The most falls and knockdowns too.

  • Myles Turner a solid effort on the physicality front for Indiana.