Most Productive Five-Man Floor Units (as of 3/21/05, sorted by +/- rating)

#	Team	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	W%
1	ATL	Delk-Diaw-J.Smith-Harrington-Walker	24	63	45	+18	5	1	83 %
2	ATL	Delk-Ivey-D.Smith-Childress-Collier	5	19	6	+13	1	0	100 %
3	ATL	Ivey-Childress-Harrington-Walker-Drobnjak	31	65	54	+11	7	4	63 %
4	ATL	Ivey-Barry-Childress-McCoy-Drobnjak	5	17	6	+11	2	0	100 %
5	ATL	Anderson-Delk-Childress-Harrington-Drobnjak	42	86	76	+10	7	4	63 %
6	ATL	Delk-Diaw-Harrington-Walker-Willis	24	48	38	+10	3	1	75 %
7	ATL	Delk-Ivey-Childress-Walker-Drobnjak	12	28	18	+10	5	1	83 %
1	BOS	Payton-Allen-Pierce-LaFrentz-Blount	200	455	400	+55	10	7	58 %
2	BOS	Payton-Allen-Pierce-Walker-LaFrentz	73	172	140	+32	5	1	83 %
3	BOS	Payton-Davis-Pierce-Walker-LaFrentz	115	279	249	+30	6	2	75 %
4	BOS	Banks-West-Davis-Jefferson-Blount	38	86	65	+21	5	3	62 %
5	BOS	Payton-Allen-Welsch-Davis-McCarty	7	30	9	+21	1	0	100 %
6	BOS	Banks-Davis-Pierce-McCarty-Jefferson	28	77	57	+20	6	3	66 %
7	BOS	Payton-Welsch-Pierce-McCarty-Blount	16	56	39	+17	8	2	80 %
1	CHA	Knight-Rush-Wallace-Ely-Brezec	45	99	75	+24	4	2	66 %
2	CHA	Knight-Hart-Wallace-Okafor-Brezec	52	93	80	+13	3	5	37 %
3	CHA	Knight-Bogans-Rush-Smith-Okafor	8	26	13	+13	1	0	100 %
4	CHA	Hart-Carroll-Kapono-Allen-Ely	7	26	13	+13	2	0	100 %
5	CHA	Bogans-Rush-Kapono-Okafor-Brezec	4	15	2	+13	2	0	100 %
6	CHA	Knight-Hart-Wallace-Ely-Brezec	21	46	34	+12	2	2	50 %
7	CHA	Knight-Smith-Kapono-Wallace-T.Smith	6	18	8	+10	3	0	100 %
1	CHI	Duhon-Hinrich-Deng-Davis-Curry	354	667	604	+63	17	11	60 %
2	CHI	Hinrich-Gordon-Deng-Harrington-Chandler	18	46	23	+23	9	2	81 %
3	CHI	Duhon-Gordon-Griffin-Harrington-Chandler	18	42	19	+23	6	2	75 %
4	CHI	Duhon-Gordon-Nocioni-Harrington-Chandler	54	118	98	+20	5	8	38 %
5	CHI	Duhon-Hinrich-Deng-Davis-Chandler	43	85	65	+20	6	3	66 %
6	CHI	Hinrich-Gordon-Deng-Harrington-Curry	28	74	54	+20	3	2	60 %
7	CHI	Duhon-Gordon-Nocioni-Davis-Chandler	42	94	75	+19	9	3	75 %
1	CLE	McInnis-Newble-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas	746	1506	1441	+65	23	24	48 %
2	CLE	McInnis-Snow-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas	192	412	350	+62	19	13	59 %
3	CLE	Harris-Snow-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas	58	130	81	+49	11	4	73 %
4	CLE	McInnis-Pavlovic-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas	147	316	291	+25	8	5	61 %
5	CLE	McInnis-Snow-Gooden-Traylor-Ilgauskas	16	46	25	+21	2	1	66 %
6	CLE	Snow-Pavlovic-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas	12	41	21	+20	4	1	80 %
7	CLE	Snow-Pavlovic-James-Varejao-Traylor	20	48	30	+18	6	1	85 %
1	DAL	Terry-Finley-Howard-Nowitzki-Dampier	293	661	575	+86	17	6	73 %
2	DAL	Terry-Stackhouse-Howard-Nowitzki-Dampier	111	254	194	+60	11	8	57 %
3	DAL	Terry-Finley-Howard-Henderson-Nowitzki	113	251	219	+32	9	6	60 %
4	DAL	Terry-Stackhouse-Finley-Nowitzki-Bradley	34	91	67	+24	6	3	66 %
5	DAL	Terry-Daniels-Stackhouse-Nowitzki-Bradley	28	68	44	+24	8	1	88 %
6	DAL	Daniels-Stackhouse-Howard-Nowitzki-Bradley	16	37	17	+20	3	1	75 %
7	DAL	Harris-Finley-Howard-Nowitzki-Dampier	66	134	116	+18	6	4	60 %
1	DEN	Miller-Buckner-Anthony-Martin-Nene	74	170	129	+41	8	5	61 %
2	DEN	Boykins-Miller-Russell-Martin-Camby	38	71	48	+23	7	3	70 %
3	DEN	Boykins-Miller-Johnson-Martin-Nene	6	24	4	+20	2	0	100 %
4	DEN	Boykins-Miller-Russell-Anthony-Camby	18	51	32	+19	5	1	83 %
5	DEN	Miller-Johnson-Anthony-Camby-Elson	50	112	94	+18	4	1	80 %
6	DEN	Boykins-Miller-Johnson-Martin-Elson	12	33	16	+17	2	0	100 %
7	DEN	Miller-Russell-Anthony-Martin-Nene	17	33	18	+15	4	0	100 %
1	DET	Billups-Hamilton-Prince-R.Wallace-B.Wallace	1171	2288	2077	+211	32	21	60 %
2	DET	Billups-Hamilton-Prince-McDyess-R.Wallace	208	402	364	+38	18	16	52 %
3	DET	Billups-Hamilton-Prince-McDyess-B.Wallace	150	331	300	+31	20	17	54 %
4	DET	Arroyo-Hamilton-Prince-McDyess-R.Wallace	54	117	91	+26	9	7	56 %
5	DET	Arroyo-Billups-Prince-R.Wallace-B.Wallace	18	46	22	+24	5	2	71 %
6	DET	Hunter-Hamilton-Dupree-McDyess-B.Wallace	39	91	70	+21	10	4	71 %
7	DET	Hunter-Hamilton-Prince-McDyess-B.Wallace	51	117	97	+20	10	8	55 %
1	GSW	B.Davis-Fisher-Richardson-Dunleavy-Foyle	29	72	44	+28	4	1	80 %
2	GSW	Fisher-Pietrus-Cheaney-Najera-Foyle	19	55	27	+28	5	1	83 %
3	GSW	Claxton-Fisher-Richardson-Dunleavy-Foyle	103	233	212	+21	5	2	71 %
4	GSW	Fisher-Cheaney-Dunleavy-Robinson-Foyle	16	32	15	+17	5	0	100 %
5	GSW	Claxton-Fisher-Dunleavy-Murphy-Robinson	62	152	139	+13	5	3	62 %
6	GSW	Claxton-Fisher-Richardson-Dunleavy-Murphy	8	34	21	+13	3	1	75 %
7	GSW	Fisher-Richardson-Dunleavy-Najera-Foyle	44	94	82	+12	3	1	75 %
1	HOU	Sura-Wesley-McGrady-Howard-Ming	423	878	844	+34	13	12	52 %
2	HOU	Wesley-Barry-McGrady-Padgett-Ming	28	81	49	+32	3	2	60 %
3	HOU	Ward-McGrady-Jackson-Taylor-Ming	167	322	293	+29	6	5	54 %
4	HOU	Sura-Barry-McGrady-Taylor-Ming	20	53	24	+29	7	0	100 %
5	HOU	Sura-Wesley-McGrady-Howard-Mutombo	128	272	246	+26	12	8	60 %
6	HOU	James-Wesley-McGrady-Howard-Ming	91	194	168	+26	4	1	80 %
7	HOU	Sura-Barry-McGrady-Padgett-Ming	26	70	44	+26	6	2	75 %
1	IND	Tinsley-Jackson-Artest-Croshere-O'Neal	106	244	198	+46	4	1	80 %
2	IND	Johnson-Miller-Jackson-Foster-Davis	97	207	169	+38	3	3	50 %
3	IND	Tinsley-F.Jones-Miller-O'Neal-Foster	104	226	195	+31	11	4	73 %
4	IND	Tinsley-Miller-Jackson-O'Neal-Foster	67	134	108	+26	4	2	66 %
5	IND	Tinsley-Miller-J.Jones-O'Neal-Foster	90	179	154	+25	4	3	57 %
6	IND	Johnson-Miller-Jackson-O'Neal-Foster	129	262	238	+24	7	5	58 %
7	IND	Tinsley-F.Jones-Miller-Croshere-Harrison	20	49	31	+18	3	0	100 %
1	LAC	Brunson-Jaric-Simmons-Brand-Rebraca	30	82	44	+38	5	1	83 %
2	LAC	Brunson-Maggette-Simmons-Brand-Kaman	448	920	888	+32	14	16	46 %
3	LAC	Livingston-Jaric-Simmons-Moore-Brand	18	42	19	+23	2	1	66 %
4	LAC	Brunson-Jaric-Simmons-Moore-Brand	19	43	23	+20	4	0	100 %
5	LAC	Livingston-Maggette-Simmons-Moore-Brand	16	45	27	+18	5	0	100 %
6	LAC	Brunson-Jaric-Simmons-Moore-Rebraca	17	49	33	+16	4	1	80 %
7	LAC	Jaric-Maggette-Simmons-Brand-Wilcox	250	498	485	+13	8	8	50 %
1	LAL	Atkins-Bryant-Jones-Odom-Cook	56	129	93	+36	10	3	76 %
2	LAL	Atkins-Bryant-Jones-Odom-Mihm	94	208	183	+25	12	6	66 %
3	LAL	Atkins-Butler-Jones-Cook-Mihm	10	32	11	+21	2	0	100 %
4	LAL	Brown-Bryant-Jones-Odom-Mihm	15	35	15	+20	6	1	85 %
5	LAL	Brown-Bryant-Jones-Odom-Grant	28	65	48	+17	4	5	44 %
6	LAL	Atkins-Butler-Odom-Walton-Cook	18	54	37	+17	4	1	80 %
7	LAL	Atkins-Bryant-Butler-Odom-Cook	102	241	225	+16	10	6	62 %
1	MEM	Williams-Battier-Miller-Gasol-Wright	97	209	159	+50	7	2	77 %
2	MEM	Watson-Battier-Miller-Gasol-Wright	89	192	155	+37	7	2	77 %
3	MEM	Watson-Battier-Miller-Cardinal-Wright	66	145	108	+37	9	4	69 %
4	MEM	Watson-Wells-Battier-Cardinal-Gasol	28	72	43	+29	3	0	100 %
5	MEM	Williams-Wells-Battier-Posey-Gasol	26	69	40	+29	4	1	80 %
6	MEM	Williams-Battier-Miller-Cardinal-Wright	190	385	359	+26	8	7	53 %
7	MEM	Watson-Posey-Miller-Swift-Gasol	58	126	102	+24	5	6	45 %
1	MIA	D.Jones-Wade-E.Jones-Haslem-O'Neal	749	1672	1549	+123	31	17	64 %
2	MIA	D.Jones-Wade-E.Jones-Laettner-O'Neal	135	311	260	+51	15	13	53 %
3	MIA	D.Jones-E.Jones-Anderson-Haslem-O'Neal	80	196	148	+48	6	5	54 %
4	MIA	D.Jones-Wade-Butler-Haslem-Doleac	35	93	58	+35	9	2	81 %
5	MIA	D.Jones-Wade-Anderson-Haslem-O'Neal	70	156	125	+31	6	7	46 %
6	MIA	D.Jones-Wade-E.Jones-Haslem-Laettner	38	92	63	+29	5	2	71 %
7	MIA	Dooling-E.Jones-Anderson-Laettner-O'Neal	31	78	50	+28	6	2	75 %
1	MIL	James-Mason-Kukoc-Smith-Pachulia	18	56	25	+31	4	0	100 %
2	MIL	James-Mason-Van Horn-Kukoc-Pachulia	48	102	78	+24	9	1	90 %
3	MIL	Strickland-Redd-Mason-Kukoc-Smith	9	29	13	+16	3	0	100 %
4	MIL	Williams-Redd-Mason-Smith-Booth	19	39	24	+15	3	1	75 %
5	MIL	Williams-Redd-Mason-Kukoc-Smith	35	100	87	+13	5	3	62 %
6	MIL	Williams-Mason-Kukoc-Smith-Pachulia	21	53	40	+13	4	1	80 %
7	MIL	James-Strickland-Redd-Kukoc-Fizer	18	37	25	+12	1	1	50 %
1	MIN	Cassell-Sprewell-Szczerbiak-Griffin-Garnett	97	211	163	+48	11	6	64 %
2	MIN	Hudson-Hoiberg-Szczerbiak-Griffin-Garnett	75	194	154	+40	14	7	66 %
3	MIN	Hudson-Hassell-Sprewell-Griffin-Garnett	59	127	98	+29	9	7	56 %
4	MIN	Cassell-Hoiberg-Szczerbiak-Griffin-Garnett	25	72	43	+29	8	2	80 %
5	MIN	Carter-Hassell-Sprewell-Garnett-Thomas	36	76	48	+28	4	1	80 %
6	MIN	Hudson-Hassell-Sprewell-Szczerbiak-Garnett	66	140	121	+19	11	6	64 %
7	MIN	Cassell-Hoiberg-Sprewell-Szczerbiak-Garnett	14	41	23	+18	7	1	87 %
1	NJN	Kidd-Vaughn-Carter-Krstic-Collins	305	587	526	+61	12	9	57 %
2	NJN	Kidd-Best-Carter-Krstic-Collins	63	144	115	+29	11	6	64 %
3	NJN	Best-E.Williams-Jefferson-Scalabrine-Collins	54	113	87	+26	8	4	66 %
4	NJN	Best-E.Williams-Jefferson-Mourning-Collins	122	233	212	+21	5	5	50 %
5	NJN	Kidd-Vaughn-Carter-Smith-Collins	42	97	79	+18	5	1	83 %
6	NJN	Kidd-Carter-Buford-Scalabrine-Krstic	30	75	59	+16	2	1	66 %
7	NJN	Kidd-Carter-Buford-Smith-Collins	28	68	52	+16	5	1	83 %
1	NOH	Dickau-Davis-Nachbar-Brown-Andersen	33	80	56	+24	4	2	66 %
2	NOH	Dickau-Jacobsen-Lynch-Brown-Andersen	14	36	19	+17	3	1	75 %
3	NOH	Dickau-Jacobsen-Nailon-Brown-Andersen	34	76	61	+15	3	3	50 %
4	NOH	Davis-Smith-Nailon-Brown-Andersen	8	27	14	+13	2	0	100 %
5	NOH	Dickau-Nailon-Nachbar-Freije-Andersen	8	20	7	+13	2	0	100 %
6	NOH	Armstrong-Wesley-Nailon-Brown-Magloire	60	109	97	+12	4	2	66 %
7	NOH	Dickau-Harrington-Lynch-Brown-Andersen	13	29	17	+12	2	1	66 %
1	NYK	Marbury-Crawford-Hardaway-K.Thomas-Mohammed	82	169	139	+30	8	1	88 %
2	NYK	Marbury-Hardaway-Ariza-Williams-Sweetney	37	98	72	+26	8	3	72 %
3	NYK	Marbury-Houston-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Sweetney	16	46	22	+24	3	0	100 %
4	NYK	Marbury-Crawford-Williams-K.Thomas-Sweetney	37	97	75	+22	6	3	66 %
5	NYK	Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-Williams-K.Thomas	36	84	63	+21	8	2	80 %
6	NYK	Marbury-Houston-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed	149	305	287	+18	6	7	46 %
7	NYK	Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Taylor	9	29	12	+17	1	0	100 %
1	ORL	Nelson-Francis-Hill-Howard-Cato	167	383	312	+71	7	6	53 %
2	ORL	Francis-Hill-Turkoglu-Howard-Battie	125	261	218	+43	19	9	67 %
3	ORL	Francis-Hill-Turkoglu-Bradley-Garrity	8	33	8	+25	1	0	100 %
4	ORL	Nelson-Hill-Turkoglu-Howard-Battie	39	111	92	+19	12	3	80 %
5	ORL	Francis-Mobley-Turkoglu-Garrity-Battie	12	38	19	+19	5	2	71 %
6	ORL	Nelson-Francis-Turkoglu-Garrity-Battie	27	65	48	+17	5	2	71 %
7	ORL	Francis-Mobley-Hill-Turkoglu-Battie	16	35	21	+14	3	1	75 %
1	PHI	Iverson-Iguodala-Korver-Webber-Dalembert	170	392	356	+36	8	3	72 %
2	PHI	Iverson-Salmons-Korver-Williamson-Jackson	57	135	103	+32	8	4	66 %
3	PHI	Iverson-Iguodala-Korver-Thomas-Dalembert	200	425	400	+25	9	7	56 %
4	PHI	Iverson-Green-Iguodala-Williamson-Dalembert	45	109	86	+23	3	3	50 %
5	PHI	Iverson-Iguodala-Korver-Williamson-Dalembert	73	168	146	+22	9	3	75 %
6	PHI	Iverson-Iguodala-Korver-Thomas-Williamson	44	105	83	+22	6	3	66 %
7	PHI	Iverson-Iguodala-McKie-Williamson-Jackson	18	50	29	+21	5	2	71 %
1	PHO	Nash-Richardson-Johnson-Marion-Stoudemire	1110	2750	2388	+362	41	14	74 %
2	PHO	Richardson-Johnson-Marion-Stoudemire-Voskuhl	38	80	52	+28	5	0	100 %
3	PHO	Johnson-Jacobsen-Marion-Stoudemire-Hunter	33	99	72	+27	5	2	71 %
4	PHO	Nash-Richardson-Jacobsen-Marion-Stoudemire	44	118	93	+25	11	4	73 %
5	PHO	Nash-Richardson-Jacobsen-Marion-Hunter	47	105	82	+23	8	4	66 %
6	PHO	Nash-Richardson-Jackson-Marion-Stoudemire	35	96	73	+23	5	3	62 %
7	PHO	Barbosa-Richardson-Johnson-Marion-Stoudemire	116	286	266	+20	10	6	62 %
1	POR	Stoudamire-Van Exel-Patterson-Ratliff-Przybilla	231	452	414	+38	10	6	62 %
2	POR	Stoudamire-Van Exel-Patterson-Randolph-Ratliff	101	192	173	+19	11	4	73 %
3	POR	Van Exel-Patterson-Miles-Randolph-Przybilla	25	51	34	+17	7	2	77 %
4	POR	Telfair-Outlaw-Miles-Abdur-Rahim-Ratliff	18	43	27	+16	4	0	100 %
5	POR	Van Exel-Anderson-Miles-Abdur-Rahim-Randolph	34	76	61	+15	5	0	100 %
6	POR	Stoudamire-Van Exel-Abdur-Rahim-Randolph-Przybilla	6	23	9	+14	1	1	50 %
7	POR	Telfair-Stoudamire-Patterson-Miles-Abdur-Rahim	6	24	10	+14	1	0	100 %
1	SAC	Bibby-Christie-Stojakovic-Webber-Miller	612	1326	1234	+92	16	11	59 %
2	SAC	Bibby-Mobley-Barnes-Songaila-Miller	52	116	87	+29	4	1	80 %
3	SAC	Bibby-Evans-Barnes-Songaila-Miller	71	166	140	+26	4	0	100 %
4	SAC	Bibby-Evans-Stojakovic-Songaila-Ostertag	26	56	38	+18	4	2	66 %
5	SAC	Bibby-Jackson-Barnes-Songaila-Ostertag	20	48	32	+16	5	3	62 %
6	SAC	Bibby-Evans-Stojakovic-Songaila-Webber	32	84	69	+15	6	3	66 %
7	SAC	Bibby-Evans-Martin-Songaila-Miller	19	51	37	+14	4	1	80 %
1	SAS	Parker-Ginobili-Bowen-Duncan-Nesterovic	576	1168	949	+219	35	13	72 %
2	SAS	Parker-Ginobili-Bowen-Horry-Duncan	146	331	251	+80	22	11	66 %
3	SAS	Parker-Ginobili-Bowen-Rose-Duncan	62	146	91	+55	12	5	70 %
4	SAS	Udrih-Brown-Ginobili-Duncan-Nesterovic	33	94	50	+44	10	3	76 %
5	SAS	Udrih-Barry-Brown-Ginobili-Duncan	19	66	31	+35	3	0	100 %
6	SAS	Parker-Barry-Bowen-Duncan-Nesterovic	112	218	187	+31	14	10	58 %
7	SAS	Parker-Ginobili-Bowen-Massenburg-Duncan	75	164	140	+24	7	7	50 %
1	SEA	Daniels-Allen-Radmanovic-Collison-Fortson	147	319	263	+56	20	16	55 %
2	SEA	Ridnour-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-Evans	177	396	347	+49	26	15	63 %
3	SEA	Daniels-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-Fortson	160	375	329	+46	21	12	63 %
4	SEA	Daniels-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-Collison	86	247	201	+46	17	9	65 %
5	SEA	Daniels-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-Evans	121	275	247	+28	18	13	58 %
6	SEA	Ridnour-Daniels-Allen-Lewis-Collison	30	76	48	+28	7	3	70 %
7	SEA	Ridnour-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-James	46	113	91	+22	9	5	64 %
1	TOR	Alston-Peterson-Rose-Marshall-Bosh	236	548	499	+49	19	16	54 %
2	TOR	Alston-Rose-Murray-Marshall-Bosh	39	96	64	+32	9	1	90 %
3	TOR	Palacio-Murray-Marshall-Bonner-Bosh	40	92	66	+26	4	0	100 %
4	TOR	Alston-Palacio-Rose-Marshall-Bonner	19	57	33	+24	5	0	100 %
5	TOR	Palacio-Peterson-Murray-Marshall-Bosh	37	81	61	+20	7	1	87 %
6	TOR	Palacio-Peterson-Murray-Bonner-Araujo	21	60	40	+20	4	0	100 %
7	TOR	Alston-Palacio-Peterson-Murray-Bosh	13	36	16	+20	1	1	50 %
1	UTA	Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Okur	100	193	165	+28	11	11	50 %
2	UTA	Lopez-Bell-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur	36	86	62	+24	2	1	66 %
3	UTA	McLeod-Giricek-Kirilenko-Boozer-Collins	61	133	117	+16	3	3	50 %
4	UTA	Eisley-Bell-Kirilenko-Boozer-Collins	10	30	15	+15	4	0	100 %
5	UTA	McLeod-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Collins	7	25	12	+13	2	0	100 %
6	UTA	Lopez-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Borchardt	7	21	8	+13	2	1	66 %
7	UTA	Lopez-Giricek-Harpring-Kirilenko-Boozer	5	15	3	+12	1	0	100 %
1	WAS	Arenas-Hughes-Jeffries-Jamison-Haywood	531	1138	1061	+77	17	13	56 %
2	WAS	Dixon-Arenas-Jamison-Ruffin-Thomas	42	121	59	+62	10	0	100 %
3	WAS	Arenas-Hayes-Jeffries-Jamison-Haywood	260	552	493	+59	11	5	68 %
4	WAS	Arenas-Hughes-Hayes-Jamison-Haywood	172	411	352	+59	12	10	54 %
5	WAS	Arenas-Hughes-Jeffries-Brown-Haywood	53	117	88	+29	3	0	100 %
6	WAS	Arenas-Hughes-Hayes-Jamison-Ruffin	140	327	302	+25	11	7	61 %
7	WAS	Arenas-Hughes-Profit-Jeffries-Haywood	35	79	60	+19	3	0	100 %

Legend: Min = the percentage of the team's total minutes the unit was on the floor. +/- = the team net points for the unit. W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court. L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court. Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.