DEFENSIVE COMPOSITE SCORE, VERSION 2

also see: DCS, version one

As I mentioned when I first released the stat I have developed called Defensive Composite Score, it was very much a work in progress. I’m not one to assume that my ideas are better than others, so, after listening to e-mails from readers and ideas from the good people at the APBRmetrics message board (see http://sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/index.php), I made a few changes to the statistic. In my opinion, it’s better than it’s ever been and it passes the “laugh test” better than ever before (although the importance of that is debatable).

The biggest change that was made was getting rid of the method of ranking the players. While this was a simple way of doing things, it did not make it clear how close or far apart some players were. Player A was better than Player B but worse than Player C, and that’s all you knew. But by how much? Instead, the new DCS is based on z-scores (thanks to reader Dave Elkin for the idea). The only downside to this is that the ratings are not on a simple 0-100 scale. However, it’s still very possible to understand what a player’s rating truly means (more on this later).

Another major change was the removal of the box score stats completely. The three stats used were blocks, steals, and foul efficiency. Unfortunately, those stats don’t tell us much and can be very deceiving. I replaced the box score section with the counterpart PER statistics that can be found here at 82games. Because counterpart PER is generally not equal for all positions, I calculated it based on a player’s z-score within their position. Also, I consider small forwards and shooting guards to be interchangeable, so those two positions were combined.

Finally, I received a bunch of e-mails explaining how it’s not fair for Player X to get a certain score because said player either plays only in garbage time or said player has to guard the other team’s best scorer every night. I tried to adjust for that by using a statistic developed at the APBRmetrics board called %St. This statistic estimates how much of a player’s minutes were against starter-quality opponents. Now, the top of the leaderboard isn’t dominated by players who come in off the bench to guard lower quality opponents.

The new average for DCS is 0. Positive scores denote good defenders and negative scores mean bad defenders.

• Scores of 40+: Excellent defender
• 20 to 40: Very good defender
• 0 to 20: Above average
• -20 to 0: Below average
• -40 to -20: Poor defender
• -40 and below: Terrible defender

Plus-minus stats and counterpart PER were found at, of course, 82games.com. Defensive ratings, which were developed by Dean Oliver, were obtained from basketball-reference.com. And thanks to everybody at the APBRmetrics board, especially Mike Goodman, Neil Paine, and “cherokee-ACB.” I also included rating percentiles (courtesy of Kevin Broom) for those wishing to see a number on a simple scale.

Here is the top 10 overall followed by the complete list:

TOP 10 OVERALL
PLAYER	DCS
Tim Duncan	65.6
Bruce Bowen	61.5
Manu Ginobili	60.4
Joel Przybilla	55.6
Devin Harris	54.0
Kevin Garnett	52.2
Yao Ming	50.1
Tony Parker	47.5
Tyrus Thomas	47.4
Luol Deng	45.9

In the table below you can see these ratings for every player, sorted by team and DCS.

If you love this stat, hate it, or just want to tell me how you feel, e-mail me at jn42887@bellsouth.net

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jon Nichols is a junior Sport Management major at the University of Michigan. He has written articles for NBADraft.net, CourtsideTimes.net, and Hoopsanalyst.com. When not at school he lives in Miami and is a huge Heat fan.

Player	Team	Pos	Def. +/-	Drtg	Counter Part	DCS Rating	Rank	Percentile
claxton,speedy	atl	PG	-6.3	107	16.8	29.0	39	88.4%
smith,josh	atl	SG/SF	+1.2	102	14.7	23.9	48	85.7%
pachulia,zaza	atl	C	-4.7	106	16.6	17.5	69	79.3%
childress,josh	atl	SG/SF	-2.3	109	13.7	10.1	107	67.8%
johnson,joe	atl	SG/SF	+0.0	111	14.4	1.5	148	55.3%
williams,marvin	atl	PF	+2.2	110	17.2	-7.2	196	40.7%
williams,shelden	atl	PF	-0.6	105	20.4	-11.0	213	35.6%
wright,lorenzen	atl	C	-0.2	108	21.9	-22.9	282	14.6%
johnson,anthony	atl	PG	+3.9	110	17.5	-26.6	293	11.2%
ivey,royal	atl	PG	+1.3	111	18.8	-27.0	294	10.9%
stoudamire,salim	atl	SG/SF	+0.2	112	16.4	-32.1	310	6.1%
jones,solomon	atl	PF	+7.3	107	19.2	-44.3	319	3.3%
lue,tyronn	atl	PG	+5.5	113	19.8	-49.1	323	2.1%
rondo,rajon	bos	PG	-8.3	103	15.7	40.8	18	94.8%
perkins,kendrick	bos	C	-3.6	105	18.4	14.5	79	76.3%
allen,tony	bos	SG/SF	+0.0	104	15.7	12.5	89	73.3%
jefferson,al	bos	C	-0.1	103	17.1	11.9	93	72.0%
powe,leon	bos	C	-7.0	106	14.2	10.3	104	68.7%
pierce,paul	bos	SG/SF	+1.9	107	15.1	6.0	129	61.1%
west,delonte	bos	SG/SF	+3.0	108	15.7	-5.3	188	43.2%
ray,allan	bos	SG/SF	-3.0	109	15.9	-9.3	205	38.0%
scalabrine,brian	bos	PF	-0.6	109	18.2	-14.1	239	27.7%
green,gerald	bos	SG/SF	+1.8	109	17.3	-20.8	273	17.3%
gomes,ryan	bos	PF	+8.6	109	16.9	-22.7	280	15.2%
szczerbiak,wally	bos	SG/SF	+5.4	110	16.7	-23.4	285	13.7%
telfair,sebastia	bos	PG	+1.2	110	19.6	-25.3	290	12.2%
okafor,emeka	cha	C	-5.8	102	16.7	32.8	31	90.9%
felton,raymond	cha	PG	-1.2	109	14.7	18.3	68	79.6%
wallace,gerald	cha	SG/SF	+1.1	104	15.7	13.5	83	75.1%
anderson,derek	cha	SG/SF	-0.5	109	15.2	5.9	130	60.8%
knight,brevin	cha	PG	-3.0	108	17.9	5.7	131	60.5%
herrmann,walter	cha	PF	-2.3	110	14.9	0.6	153	53.8%
may,sean	cha	PF	+0.3	106	17.6	-7.9	199	39.8%
carroll,matt	cha	SG/SF	+4.1	110	15.6	-12.1	225	31.9%
morrison,adam	cha	SG/SF	+2.0	112	17.0	-27.4	295	10.6%
mcinnis,jeff	cha	PG	+2.7	112	16.4	-29.9	303	8.2%
brezec,primoz	cha	C	+3.1	109	24.2	-33.8	311	5.8%
voskuhl,jake	cha	C	+4.4	106	22.4	-46.5	320	3.0%
thomas,tyrus	chi	PF	-4.0	93	13.4	47.4	10	97.3%
deng,luol	chi	SG/SF	-0.5	100	12.3	45.9	11	97.0%
brown,p.j.	chi	PF	-3.5	100	16.5	37.5	23	93.3%
duhon,chris	chi	PG	-0.3	102	13.0	36.9	25	92.7%
wallace,ben	chi	C	+2.4	95	14.6	33.9	29	91.5%
hinrich,kirk	chi	PG	+1.9	102	14.7	31.6	34	90.0%
gordon,ben	chi	SG/SF	+3.5	103	12.2	23.4	50	85.1%
sefolosha,thabo	chi	SG/SF	-4.0	99	15.5	19.2	63	81.2%
nocioni,andres	chi	PF	+3.3	99	18.4	8.1	119	64.1%
griffin,adrian	chi	SG/SF	-0.9	98	16.3	6.7	125	62.3%
allen,malik	chi	PF	+0.8	100	16.8	-2.6	174	47.4%
ilgauskas,zydrun	cle	C	-3.0	99	15.1	43.2	15	95.7%
james,lebron	cle	SG/SF	-0.8	100	13.0	40.8	19	94.5%
pavlovic,sasha	cle	SG/SF	-3.6	103	12.5	38.2	22	93.6%
hughes,larry	cle	SG/SF	-0.1	103	13.4	30.9	35	89.7%
snow,eric	cle	PG	+0.0	104	15.4	22.5	52	84.5%
varejao,anderson	cle	C	-3.8	98	17.3	15.9	74	77.8%
gooden,drew	cle	PF	+6.4	100	16.5	14.7	77	76.9%
marshall,donyell	cle	PF	-1.2	99	16.8	8.2	118	64.4%
gibson,daniel	cle	PG	-1.6	105	17.3	4.8	135	59.3%
jones,damon	cle	PG	+5.3	107	14.0	-12.2	227	31.3%
harris,devin	dal	PG	-8.6	104	15.0	54.0	5	98.8%
howard,josh	dal	SG/SF	+1.0	102	13.0	34.1	28	91.8%
dampier,erick	dal	C	-4.4	102	17.2	32.9	30	91.2%
nowitzki,dirk	dal	PF	+1.7	102	13.1	32.2	33	90.3%
terry,jason	dal	PG	+1.9	106	14.8	19.1	64	80.9%
george,devean	dal	SG/SF	+1.0	103	15.3	6.6	126	62.0%
diop,desagana	dal	C	-1.3	98	19.1	1.3	150	54.7%
stackhouse,jerry	dal	SG/SF	+2.6	106	13.8	-2.4	173	47.7%
croshere,austin	dal	PF	-3.2	102	20.8	-12.9	233	29.5%
buckner,greg	dal	SG/SF	+3.3	105	16.8	-18.4	260	21.3%
camby,marcus	den	C	+2.1	97	15.4	28.0	40	88.1%
hilario,nene	den	PF	-3.6	104	17.3	21.1	57	83.0%
evans,reggie	den	PF	-4.6	101	17.4	16.1	72	78.4%
iverson,allen	den	SG/SF	-0.7	108	13.7	14.3	80	76.0%
diawara,yakhouba	den	SG/SF	-3.6	110	16.2	-3.8	181	45.3%
kleiza,linas	den	PF	-0.6	108	16.6	-9.2	203	38.6%
smith,j.r.	den	SG/SF	+2.2	109	15.5	-10.7	211	36.2%
blake,steve	den	PG	+2.7	111	16.2	-11.7	219	33.7%
najera,eduardo	den	PF	+2.9	106	19.4	-15.9	252	23.7%
anthony,carmelo	den	SG/SF	+6.0	108	17.0	-18.6	261	21.0%
maxiell,jason	det	PF	-4.2	102	14.2	23.7	49	85.4%
prince,tayshaun	det	SG/SF	+2.4	107	12.2	20.0	59	82.4%
wallace,rasheed	det	PF	+3.2	100	16.9	18.3	67	79.9%
mcdyess,antonio	det	PF	-4.0	100	17.6	13.3	85	74.5%
hamilton,richard	det	SG/SF	-0.4	108	14.6	12.8	88	73.6%
billups,chauncey	det	PG	+2.6	106	15.7	12.0	92	72.3%
delfino,carlos	det	SG/SF	-4.3	104	14.7	11.1	98	70.5%
webber,chris	det	PF	+1.8	103	20.5	0.3	156	52.9%
murray,ronald	det	SG/SF	+0.4	107	16.2	-7.8	198	40.1%
hunter,lindsey	det	PG	+2.6	106	15.6	-12.5	228	31.0%
mohammed,nazr	det	C	+5.1	99	23.6	-15.7	249	24.6%
davis,baron	gsw	PG	-4.3	106	16.1	29.9	38	88.8%
biedrins,andris	gsw	C	-4.6	104	18.0	19.2	62	81.5%
jackson,stephen	gsw	SG/SF	-3.2	109	15.6	14.1	82	75.4%
harrington,al	gsw	PF	-0.4	108	17.0	7.5	123	62.9%
richardson,jason	gsw	SG/SF	-1.9	109	16.4	7.1	124	62.6%
ellis,monta	gsw	SG/SF	-0.9	109	15.8	2.1	145	56.2%
pietrus,mickael	gsw	SG/SF	+3.3	108	16.3	-11.4	218	34.0%
barnes,matt	gsw	SG/SF	+0.9	107	17.2	-12.6	230	30.4%
jasikevicius,sar	gsw	PG	+0.0	110	16.0	-16.9	256	22.5%
azubuike,kelenna	gsw	SG/SF	+4.7	109	19.0	-42.2	317	4.0%
ming,yao	hou	C	-2.1	98	11.9	50.1	7	98.2%
wells,bonzi	hou	SG/SF	-1.3	98	9.2	49.9	8	97.9%
battier,shane	hou	SG/SF	-3.7	102	13.4	44.6	12	96.7%
hayes,chuck	hou	PF	-9.1	98	18.7	44.3	13	96.4%
mcgrady,tracy	hou	SG/SF	+0.7	100	12.2	44.1	14	96.0%
alston,rafer	hou	PG	-4.2	102	15.8	42.1	16	95.4%
mutombo,dikembe	hou	C	-3.6	96	18.4	26.6	41	87.8%
snyder,kirk	hou	SG/SF	+4.4	102	13.9	-4.6	185	44.1%
howard,juwan	hou	PF	+8.2	103	16.8	-11.9	223	32.5%
head,luther	hou	SG/SF	+7.3	102	15.8	-13.8	237	28.3%
o'neal,jermaine	ind	C	-4.4	101	13.8	41.5	17	95.1%
tinsley,jamaal	ind	PG	-0.3	105	18.3	13.4	84	74.8%
foster,jeff	ind	C	-0.9	102	17.7	11.2	97	70.8%
dunleavy,mike	ind	SG/SF	+0.7	107	14.1	10.9	101	69.6%
diogu,ike	ind	PF	-3.7	106	13.8	9.6	109	67.2%
granger,danny	ind	SG/SF	+2.8	107	15.1	0.8	152	54.1%
daniels,marquis	ind	SG/SF	+0.1	108	14.5	-7.7	197	40.4%
armstrong,darrel	ind	PG	+0.5	105	18.0	-13.2	234	29.2%
murphy,troy	ind	PF	+4.9	106	20.0	-19.1	265	19.8%
mcleod,keith	ind	PG	+1.6	110	17.3	-22.6	279	15.5%
williams,shawne	ind	SG/SF	+8.9	109	19.8	-65.8	328	0.6%
ewing,daniel	lac	PG	-7.4	106	14.0	24.7	46	86.3%
brand,elton	lac	PF	+2.5	103	13.9	22.2	56	83.3%
thomas,tim	lac	PF	-5.2	106	17.6	10.6	102	69.3%
maggette,corey	lac	SG/SF	-0.6	106	14.7	10.4	103	69.0%
mobley,cuttino	lac	SG/SF	+0.8	108	14.8	7.8	122	63.2%
cassell,sam	lac	PG	-2.4	109	16.8	6.1	128	61.4%
kaman,chris	lac	C	+2.8	103	17.8	3.9	138	58.4%
ross,quinton	lac	SG/SF	+1.5	106	16.4	-0.7	162	51.1%
livingston,shaun	lac	PG	+5.8	107	17.6	-14.5	243	26.4%
hart,jason	lac	PG	+3.1	106	21.1	-19.6	266	19.5%
bryant,kobe	lal	SG/SF	-0.7	109	13.7	12.9	87	73.9%
odom,lamar	lal	PF	-2.8	107	17.0	12.4	91	72.6%
farmar,jordan	lal	PG	-5.1	110	14.1	6.4	127	61.7%
walton,luke	lal	SG/SF	-0.6	110	16.1	2.9	140	57.8%
bynum,andrew	lal	C	-1.7	106	20.1	-2.1	171	48.3%
brown,kwame	lal	C	+0.3	106	18.8	-3.7	180	45.6%
parker,smush	lal	PG	+5.2	110	17.8	-14.4	240	27.4%
evans,maurice	lal	SG/SF	+0.3	112	14.6	-16.3	253	23.4%
turiaf,ronny	lal	PF	+1.6	106	17.9	-23.4	284	14.0%
cook,brian	lal	PF	-0.8	108	21.6	-24.3	287	13.1%
radmanovic,vladi	lal	PF	+1.0	109	20.1	-28.7	300	9.1%
vujacic,sasha	lal	SG/SF	+4.3	110	16.3	-37.7	313	5.2%
gay,rudy	mem	SG/SF	-4.0	111	16.8	-0.8	163	50.8%
stoudamire,damon	mem	PG	-0.3	115	17.3	-11.8	220	33.4%
miller,mike	mem	SG/SF	+0.5	114	15.6	-12.7	231	30.1%
harrington,junio	mem	PG	-4.5	112	18.7	-14.4	241	27.1%
gasol,pau	mem	PF	+4.3	109	18.1	-15.7	248	24.9%
roberts,lawrence	mem	C	-2.5	110	22.5	-28.0	296	10.3%
swift,stromile	mem	C	+0.3	109	21.0	-28.0	298	9.7%
johnson,alexande	mem	PF	+1.5	108	20.6	-28.6	299	9.4%
atkins,chucky	mem	PG	+2.5	116	16.0	-30.1	304	7.9%
warrick,hakim	mem	PF	+3.1	113	19.5	-34.4	312	5.5%
kinsey,tarance	mem	SG/SF	+1.5	112	19.0	-39.3	316	4.3%
jones,dahntay	mem	SG/SF	+2.1	115	19.2	-47.5	322	2.4%
jones,eddie	mia	SG/SF	-3.7	108	12.7	30.2	37	89.1%
wade,dwyane	mia	SG/SF	+0.0	103	14.3	25.6	43	87.2%
o'neal,shaquille	mia	C	-1.2	104	15.0	25.4	44	86.9%
williams,jason	mia	PG	-0.4	109	13.9	22.5	53	84.2%
mourning,alonzo	mia	C	+0.6	102	15.0	16.6	71	78.7%
haslem,udonis	mia	PF	+0.2	105	18.2	9.2	111	66.6%
posey,james	mia	SG/SF	-0.9	104	16.8	2.2	144	56.5%
wright,dorell	mia	SG/SF	+2.2	102	16.1	1.6	147	55.6%
walker,antoine	mia	PF	-1.2	106	16.6	-0.4	160	51.7%
kapono,jason	mia	SG/SF	+1.3	109	17.3	-13.6	236	28.6%
doleac,michael	mia	C	+1.6	104	16.8	-19.6	267	19.1%
payton,gary	mia	PG	+4.1	108	18.9	-23.0	283	14.3%
bogut,andrew	mil	C	-4.6	110	17.7	7.9	120	63.8%
redd,michael	mil	SG/SF	-2.4	114	13.9	4.8	136	59.0%
skinner,brian	mil	PF	-1.7	109	17.6	2.4	142	57.1%
boykins,earl	mil	PG	+1.9	113	13.3	-0.7	161	51.4%
williams,mo	mil	PG	-1.5	112	18.6	-9.2	204	38.3%
patterson,ruben	mil	SG/SF	-1.7	111	17.7	-10.4	209	36.8%
villanueva,charl	mil	PF	-2.5	110	21.6	-22.3	277	16.1%
bell,charlie	mil	SG/SF	+0.3	114	18.3	-26.2	292	11.6%
gadzuric,dan	mil	C	-0.2	108	20.7	-30.7	307	7.0%
ilyasova,ersan	mil	PF	+1.6	111	22.5	-49.2	324	1.8%
noel,david	mil	SG/SF	+4.5	112	20.0	-65.5	327	0.9%
garnett,kevin	min	PF	-5.7	101	13.4	52.2	6	98.5%
jaric,marko	min	SG/SF	-1.3	107	15.6	-2.0	169	48.9%
davis,ricky	min	SG/SF	-0.4	110	16.5	-2.7	176	46.8%
mccants,rashad	min	SG/SF	-1.6	108	14.2	-6.0	191	42.2%
smith,craig	min	PF	-1.0	106	17.6	-11.3	215	35.0%
blount,mark	min	C	+3.8	108	18.5	-12.2	226	31.6%
hassell,trenton	min	SG/SF	+1.5	112	17.4	-14.9	244	26.1%
hudson,troy	min	PG	-1.7	111	17.5	-17.4	257	22.2%
james,mike	min	PG	+2.5	111	19.2	-18.7	262	20.7%
foye,randy	min	SG/SF	+1.5	109	16.7	-21.9	276	16.4%
collins,jason	njn	C	-7.5	107	19.1	24.9	45	86.6%
kidd,jason	njn	PG	+0.9	103	16.3	22.4	54	83.9%
carter,vince	njn	SG/SF	+1.0	107	13.6	15.8	75	77.5%
krstic,nenad	njn	C	-1.7	107	15.8	14.6	78	76.6%
boone,josh	njn	PF	-3.4	105	13.9	8.5	117	64.7%
jefferson,richar	njn	SG/SF	+1.4	109	14.1	7.9	121	63.5%
wright,antoine	njn	SG/SF	+0.1	107	15.9	-2.4	172	48.0%
moore,mikki	njn	C	+2.4	106	18.3	-7.1	194	41.3%
nachbar,bostjan	njn	PF	-1.0	106	16.7	-8.2	200	39.5%
williams,marcus	njn	PG	-2.4	109	18.0	-17.5	258	21.9%
house,eddie	njn	SG/SF	+6.4	108	14.6	-29.1	302	8.5%
robinson,cliffor	njn	PF	+7.4	108	18.8	-46.8	321	2.7%
chandler,tyson	nor	C	+0.6	103	15.5	17.2	70	79.0%
armstrong,hilton	nor	C	-6.0	106	12.7	15.2	76	77.2%
pargo,jannero	nor	PG	-5.7	108	15.6	11.1	99	70.2%
butler,rasual	nor	SG/SF	-3.8	108	16.0	8.7	113	66.0%
jackson,bobby	nor	PG	-2.6	107	14.9	8.7	114	65.7%
paul,chris	nor	PG	+6.8	106	15.9	-1.3	166	49.8%
brown,devin	nor	SG/SF	+0.0	108	17.8	-2.8	177	46.5%
west,david	nor	PF	+4.4	106	17.1	-3.9	182	45.0%
mason,desmond	nor	SG/SF	+2.5	109	17.2	-9.7	207	37.4%
johnson,linton	nor	PF	-4.4	103	20.8	-12.8	232	29.8%
jackson,marc	nor	C	+2.9	108	16.9	-14.4	242	26.7%
simmons,cedric	nor	PF	-0.9	107	19.0	-21.8	275	16.7%
balkman,renaldo	nyk	SG/SF	-9.2	102	14.5	30.9	36	89.4%
lee,david	nyk	PF	-2.6	105	15.8	11.9	94	71.7%
frye,channing	nyk	PF	-1.1	108	18.7	1.7	146	55.9%
crawford,jamal	nyk	SG/SF	+3.3	112	12.5	-2.8	178	46.2%
collins,mardy	nyk	SG/SF	-2.5	109	15.0	-3.5	179	45.9%
richardson,quent	nyk	SG/SF	+1.8	108	17.4	-6.0	190	42.6%
francis,steve	nyk	SG/SF	-0.8	109	18.2	-8.8	202	38.9%
jeffries,jared	nyk	SG/SF	+3.0	108	18.8	-15.8	250	24.3%
curry,eddy	nyk	C	+5.3	110	16.3	-15.8	251	24.0%
robinson,nate	nyk	PG	-2.4	110	18.0	-16.6	255	22.8%
marbury,stephon	nyk	PG	+5.4	112	16.4	-18.1	259	21.6%
rose,malik	nyk	PF	+1.3	107	21.8	-43.0	318	3.6%
howard,dwight	orl	C	+0.7	99	12.0	37.3	24	93.0%
battie,tony	orl	PF	-4.1	104	17.5	32.2	32	90.6%
ariza,trevor	orl	SG/SF	-4.2	103	14.6	20.2	58	82.7%
hill,grant	orl	SG/SF	+0.3	106	15.9	13.2	86	74.2%
turkoglu,hedo	orl	SG/SF	-0.6	105	17.1	12.5	90	72.9%
arroyo,carlos	orl	PG	-3.1	107	14.8	9.1	112	66.3%
milicic,darko	orl	C	+0.6	101	14.9	8.6	115	65.3%
nelson,jameer	orl	PG	+2.9	107	18.3	-1.1	165	50.2%
dooling,keyon	orl	SG/SF	+3.5	107	12.0	-2.1	170	48.6%
bogans,keith	orl	SG/SF	-0.3	107	17.1	-9.7	206	37.7%
redick,j.j.	orl	SG/SF	+3.2	108	16.3	-30.5	306	7.3%
dalembert,samuel	phi	C	-1.8	103	16.7	22.2	55	83.6%
williams,louis	phi	PG	-6.4	109	12.2	19.8	61	81.8%
ollie,kevin	phi	PG	+1.8	110	12.4	11.4	96	71.1%
miller,andre	phi	PG	+1.6	108	15.6	8.5	116	65.0%
smith,joe	phi	PF	+1.5	105	14.0	5.5	133	59.9%
iguodala,andre	phi	SG/SF	+1.8	105	16.5	2.5	141	57.4%
hunter,steven	phi	C	+0.4	107	16.5	0.5	155	53.2%
carney,rodney	phi	SG/SF	+1.8	108	17.4	-11.9	221	33.1%
green,willie	phi	SG/SF	+4.0	110	16.5	-20.7	272	17.6%
korver,kyle	phi	SG/SF	+2.6	109	17.9	-31.1	308	6.7%
marion,shawn	pho	SG/SF	-0.5	100	16.1	26.3	42	87.5%
bell,raja	pho	SG/SF	-3.6	110	15.5	11.5	95	71.4%
thomas,kurt	pho	C	-4.9	103	17.2	9.4	110	66.9%
stoudemire,amare	pho	C	+2.8	103	17.3	4.9	134	59.6%
nash,steve	pho	PG	+0.9	110	16.2	2.9	139	58.1%
jones,james	pho	SG/SF	-3.6	108	14.9	0.9	151	54.4%
barbosa,leandro	pho	SG/SF	+0.5	108	14.5	-0.4	159	52.0%
diaw,boris	pho	PF	+2.5	109	16.6	-4.3	184	44.4%
banks,marcus	pho	PG	+6.0	108	21.8	-60.3	326	1.2%
przybilla,joel	por	C	-8.4	106	13.4	55.6	4	99.1%
randolph,zach	por	PF	+1.7	109	15.0	5.5	132	60.2%
magloire,jamaal	por	C	+0.2	108	14.9	-4.8	186	43.8%
udoka,ime	por	SG/SF	-1.7	111	18.3	-5.0	187	43.5%
aldridge,lamarcu	por	C	-1.4	109	17.1	-8.4	201	39.2%
jack,jarrett	por	PG	+2.3	112	17.4	-11.9	222	32.8%
outlaw,travis	por	PF	-0.2	108	17.7	-18.7	263	20.4%
rodriguez,sergio	por	PG	+0.6	111	15.7	-22.4	278	15.8%
roy,brandon	por	SG/SF	+4.0	111	18.1	-25.2	289	12.5%
jones,fred	por	SG/SF	+3.2	108	17.2	-25.8	291	11.9%
webster,martell	por	SG/SF	-0.6	112	18.5	-28.0	297	10.0%
artest,ron	sac	SG/SF	-1.5	105	15.1	19.9	60	82.1%
miller,brad	sac	C	-4.7	107	17.1	18.8	65	80.5%
thomas,kenny	sac	PF	+1.5	107	18.3	1.4	149	55.0%
bibby,mike	sac	PG	-0.1	110	18.0	-2.6	175	47.1%
williamson,corli	sac	PF	-6.4	110	17.5	-7.1	195	41.0%
price,ronnie	sac	PG	+1.3	107	15.2	-11.3	216	34.7%
garcia,francisco	sac	SG/SF	-3.1	108	17.3	-14.0	238	28.0%
martin,kevin	sac	SG/SF	+5.5	109	16.5	-15.2	245	25.8%
abdur-rahim,shar	sac	PF	+3.5	108	18.2	-15.6	246	25.5%
salmons,john	sac	SG/SF	+2.8	109	15.5	-15.7	247	25.2%
duncan,tim	san	C	-6.5	94	13.6	65.6	1	100.0%
bowen,bruce	san	SG/SF	-9.6	103	13.7	61.5	2	99.7%
ginobili,manu	san	SG/SF	-4.7	98	11.7	60.4	3	99.4%
parker,tony	san	PG	-1.2	102	13.7	47.5	9	97.6%
horry,robert	san	PF	-4.0	98	16.7	23.4	51	84.8%
barry,brent	san	SG/SF	+5.8	102	12.9	10.9	100	69.9%
elson,francisco	san	C	+0.3	97	20.6	10.2	105	68.4%
vaughn,jacque	san	PG	-3.3	102	18.3	3.9	137	58.7%
oberto,fabricio	san	C	+3.0	100	17.6	0.6	154	53.5%
bonner,matt	san	PF	+5.7	100	13.1	-0.2	158	52.3%
udrih,beno	san	PG	+5.2	103	14.6	-5.8	189	42.9%
finley,michael	san	SG/SF	+7.3	103	15.2	-13.3	235	28.9%
lewis,rashard	sea	SG/SF	-1.1	110	16.1	0.2	157	52.6%
allen,ray	sea	SG/SF	+1.3	112	14.4	-4.1	183	44.7%
collison,nick	sea	PF	-3.2	109	20.4	-6.9	192	41.9%
ridnour,luke	sea	PG	+0.8	112	17.8	-11.0	214	35.3%
watson,earl	sea	PG	+1.0	111	16.2	-11.4	217	34.3%
wilcox,chris	sea	PF	+1.5	109	20.7	-16.3	254	23.1%
wilks,mike	sea	PG	-3.8	113	16.9	-19.8	268	18.8%
gelabale,mickael	sea	SG/SF	-1.7	113	16.2	-20.8	274	17.0%
wilkins,damien	sea	SG/SF	+3.5	111	16.5	-24.9	288	12.8%
petro,johan	sea	C	+0.5	108	22.6	-38.0	314	4.9%
garbajosa,jorge	tor	PF	-5.0	105	14.7	39.0	21	93.9%
parker,anthony	tor	SG/SF	-7.1	108	14.3	35.6	26	92.4%
nesterovic,rasho	tor	C	-6.0	104	16.9	35.0	27	92.1%
bosh,chris	tor	PF	-1.7	104	15.5	24.4	47	86.0%
ford,t.j.	tor	PG	-2.3	106	17.8	18.3	66	80.2%
calderon,jose	tor	PG	+2.8	108	15.8	-12.1	224	32.2%
bargnani,andrea	tor	PF	+1.9	106	16.5	-12.6	229	30.7%
graham,joey	tor	SG/SF	-0.5	107	19.5	-22.9	281	14.9%
peterson,morris	tor	SG/SF	+4.4	106	17.0	-23.4	286	13.4%
dixon,juan	tor	SG/SF	-0.3	110	18.4	-30.1	305	7.6%
humphries,kris	tor	PF	+5.1	105	19.5	-38.8	315	4.6%
kirilenko,andrei	uta	SG/SF	+2.1	103	11.7	39.1	20	94.2%
boozer,carlos	uta	PF	+2.7	104	15.6	14.1	81	75.7%
millsap,paul	uta	PF	-3.7	102	16.4	10.2	106	68.1%
giricek,gordan	uta	SG/SF	-5.4	110	13.3	9.6	108	67.5%
brewer,ronnie	uta	SG/SF	-0.9	107	14.5	2.3	143	56.8%
collins,jarron	uta	C	-8.9	110	17.1	-1.0	164	50.5%
fisher,derek	uta	SG/SF	-1.9	109	17.7	-1.6	167	49.5%
williams,deron	uta	PG	+4.6	110	16.5	-10.2	208	37.1%
harpring,matt	uta	SG/SF	+0.6	108	15.1	-10.8	212	35.9%
okur,mehmet	uta	C	+10.1	108	18.5	-31.3	309	6.4%
haywood,brendan	was	C	-6.6	109	16.8	16.1	73	78.1%
butler,caron	was	SG/SF	-1.5	109	17.2	-1.8	168	49.2%
stevenson,deshaw	was	SG/SF	+2.5	114	14.7	-7.1	193	41.6%
arenas,gilbert	was	PG	-2.1	111	19.3	-10.6	210	36.5%
thomas,etan	was	C	+1.6	107	20.3	-19.1	264	20.1%
daniels,antonio	was	SG/SF	+0.5	114	13.9	-19.9	269	18.5%
jamison,antawn	was	PF	+3.9	110	18.5	-20.2	270	18.2%
songaila,darius	was	PF	-1.6	111	16.9	-20.7	271	17.9%
blatche,andray	was	PF	-0.2	108	20.9	-29.0	301	8.8%
hayes,jarvis	was	SG/SF	+5.6	112	19.9	-56.8	325	1.5%