NBA Statistics
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Services | Contact Us

DEFENSIVE COMPOSITE SCORE, VERSION 2

By Jon Nichols

also see: DCS, version one

As I mentioned when I first released the stat I have developed called Defensive Composite Score, it was very much a work in progress. Iím not one to assume that my ideas are better than others, so, after listening to e-mails from readers and ideas from the good people at the APBRmetrics message board (see http://sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/index.php), I made a few changes to the statistic. In my opinion, itís better than itís ever been and it passes the ďlaugh testĒ better than ever before (although the importance of that is debatable).

The biggest change that was made was getting rid of the method of ranking the players. While this was a simple way of doing things, it did not make it clear how close or far apart some players were. Player A was better than Player B but worse than Player C, and thatís all you knew. But by how much? Instead, the new DCS is based on z-scores (thanks to reader Dave Elkin for the idea). The only downside to this is that the ratings are not on a simple 0-100 scale. However, itís still very possible to understand what a playerís rating truly means (more on this later).

Another major change was the removal of the box score stats completely. The three stats used were blocks, steals, and foul efficiency. Unfortunately, those stats donít tell us much and can be very deceiving. I replaced the box score section with the counterpart PER statistics that can be found here at 82games. Because counterpart PER is generally not equal for all positions, I calculated it based on a playerís z-score within their position. Also, I consider small forwards and shooting guards to be interchangeable, so those two positions were combined.

Finally, I received a bunch of e-mails explaining how itís not fair for Player X to get a certain score because said player either plays only in garbage time or said player has to guard the other teamís best scorer every night. I tried to adjust for that by using a statistic developed at the APBRmetrics board called %St. This statistic estimates how much of a playerís minutes were against starter-quality opponents. Now, the top of the leaderboard isnít dominated by players who come in off the bench to guard lower quality opponents.

The new average for DCS is 0. Positive scores denote good defenders and negative scores mean bad defenders.

  • Scores of 40+: Excellent defender
  • 20 to 40: Very good defender
  • 0 to 20: Above average
  • -20 to 0: Below average
  • -40 to -20: Poor defender
  • -40 and below: Terrible defender
This statistic still has many of the same limitations as before. DCS still is no substitute for scouting out the game in person and analyzing a playerís strengths and weaknesses. It canít tell you that Trenton Hassell has the unpleasant job of guarding the Kobe Bryantís of the world every night. Hopefully it does as good of a job as statistics possibly can. Most people havenít seen every player play enough to get a good judgment of their defensive ability, so DCS is useful in this sense.

Plus-minus stats and counterpart PER were found at, of course, 82games.com. Defensive ratings, which were developed by Dean Oliver, were obtained from basketball-reference.com. And thanks to everybody at the APBRmetrics board, especially Mike Goodman, Neil Paine, and ďcherokee-ACB.Ē I also included rating percentiles (courtesy of Kevin Broom) for those wishing to see a number on a simple scale.

Here is the top 10 overall followed by the complete list:

TOP 10 OVERALL
 PLAYER DCS
 Tim Duncan 65.6
 Bruce Bowen 61.5
 Manu Ginobili 60.4
 Joel Przybilla 55.6
 Devin Harris 54.0
 Kevin Garnett 52.2
 Yao Ming 50.1
 Tony Parker 47.5
 Tyrus Thomas 47.4
 Luol Deng 45.9

In the table below you can see these ratings for every player, sorted by team and DCS.

If you love this stat, hate it, or just want to tell me how you feel, e-mail me at jn42887@bellsouth.net

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jon Nichols is a junior Sport Management major at the University of Michigan. He has written articles for NBADraft.net, CourtsideTimes.net, and Hoopsanalyst.com. When not at school he lives in Miami and is a huge Heat fan.

 Player Team Pos Def.
+/-
Drtg Counter
Part
DCS
Rating
Rank Percentile
 claxton,speedy atl PG -6.3 107 16.8 29.0 39 88.4%
 smith,josh atl SG/SF +1.2 102 14.7 23.9 48 85.7%
 pachulia,zaza atl C -4.7 106 16.6 17.5 69 79.3%
 childress,josh atl SG/SF -2.3 109 13.7 10.1 107 67.8%
 johnson,joe atl SG/SF +0.0 111 14.4 1.5 148 55.3%
 williams,marvin atl PF +2.2 110 17.2 -7.2 196 40.7%
 williams,shelden atl PF -0.6 105 20.4 -11.0 213 35.6%
 wright,lorenzen atl C -0.2 108 21.9 -22.9 282 14.6%
 johnson,anthony atl PG +3.9 110 17.5 -26.6 293 11.2%
 ivey,royal atl PG +1.3 111 18.8 -27.0 294 10.9%
 stoudamire,salim atl SG/SF +0.2 112 16.4 -32.1 310 6.1%
 jones,solomon atl PF +7.3 107 19.2 -44.3 319 3.3%
 lue,tyronn atl PG +5.5 113 19.8 -49.1 323 2.1%
 rondo,rajon bos PG -8.3 103 15.7 40.8 18 94.8%
 perkins,kendrick bos C -3.6 105 18.4 14.5 79 76.3%
 allen,tony bos SG/SF +0.0 104 15.7 12.5 89 73.3%
 jefferson,al bos C -0.1 103 17.1 11.9 93 72.0%
 powe,leon bos C -7.0 106 14.2 10.3 104 68.7%
 pierce,paul bos SG/SF +1.9 107 15.1 6.0 129 61.1%
 west,delonte bos SG/SF +3.0 108 15.7 -5.3 188 43.2%
 ray,allan bos SG/SF -3.0 109 15.9 -9.3 205 38.0%
 scalabrine,brian bos PF -0.6 109 18.2 -14.1 239 27.7%
 green,gerald bos SG/SF +1.8 109 17.3 -20.8 273 17.3%
 gomes,ryan bos PF +8.6 109 16.9 -22.7 280 15.2%
 szczerbiak,wally bos SG/SF +5.4 110 16.7 -23.4 285 13.7%
 telfair,sebastia bos PG +1.2 110 19.6 -25.3 290 12.2%
 okafor,emeka cha C -5.8 102 16.7 32.8 31 90.9%
 felton,raymond cha PG -1.2 109 14.7 18.3 68 79.6%
 wallace,gerald cha SG/SF +1.1 104 15.7 13.5 83 75.1%
 anderson,derek cha SG/SF -0.5 109 15.2 5.9 130 60.8%
 knight,brevin cha PG -3.0 108 17.9 5.7 131 60.5%
 herrmann,walter cha PF -2.3 110 14.9 0.6 153 53.8%
 may,sean cha PF +0.3 106 17.6 -7.9 199 39.8%
 carroll,matt cha SG/SF +4.1 110 15.6 -12.1 225 31.9%
 morrison,adam cha SG/SF +2.0 112 17.0 -27.4 295 10.6%
 mcinnis,jeff cha PG +2.7 112 16.4 -29.9 303 8.2%
 brezec,primoz cha C +3.1 109 24.2 -33.8 311 5.8%
 voskuhl,jake cha C +4.4 106 22.4 -46.5 320 3.0%
 thomas,tyrus chi PF -4.0 93 13.4 47.4 10 97.3%
 deng,luol chi SG/SF -0.5 100 12.3 45.9 11 97.0%
 brown,p.j. chi PF -3.5 100 16.5 37.5 23 93.3%
 duhon,chris chi PG -0.3 102 13.0 36.9 25 92.7%
 wallace,ben chi C +2.4 95 14.6 33.9 29 91.5%
 hinrich,kirk chi PG +1.9 102 14.7 31.6 34 90.0%
 gordon,ben chi SG/SF +3.5 103 12.2 23.4 50 85.1%
 sefolosha,thabo chi SG/SF -4.0 99 15.5 19.2 63 81.2%
 nocioni,andres chi PF +3.3 99 18.4 8.1 119 64.1%
 griffin,adrian chi SG/SF -0.9 98 16.3 6.7 125 62.3%
 allen,malik chi PF +0.8 100 16.8 -2.6 174 47.4%
 ilgauskas,zydrun cle C -3.0 99 15.1 43.2 15 95.7%
 james,lebron cle SG/SF -0.8 100 13.0 40.8 19 94.5%
 pavlovic,sasha cle SG/SF -3.6 103 12.5 38.2 22 93.6%
 hughes,larry cle SG/SF -0.1 103 13.4 30.9 35 89.7%
 snow,eric cle PG +0.0 104 15.4 22.5 52 84.5%
 varejao,anderson cle C -3.8 98 17.3 15.9 74 77.8%
 gooden,drew cle PF +6.4 100 16.5 14.7 77 76.9%
 marshall,donyell cle PF -1.2 99 16.8 8.2 118 64.4%
 gibson,daniel cle PG -1.6 105 17.3 4.8 135 59.3%
 jones,damon cle PG +5.3 107 14.0 -12.2 227 31.3%
 harris,devin dal PG -8.6 104 15.0 54.0 5 98.8%
 howard,josh dal SG/SF +1.0 102 13.0 34.1 28 91.8%
 dampier,erick dal C -4.4 102 17.2 32.9 30 91.2%
 nowitzki,dirk dal PF +1.7 102 13.1 32.2 33 90.3%
 terry,jason dal PG +1.9 106 14.8 19.1 64 80.9%
 george,devean dal SG/SF +1.0 103 15.3 6.6 126 62.0%
 diop,desagana dal C -1.3 98 19.1 1.3 150 54.7%
 stackhouse,jerry dal SG/SF +2.6 106 13.8 -2.4 173 47.7%
 croshere,austin dal PF -3.2 102 20.8 -12.9 233 29.5%
 buckner,greg dal SG/SF +3.3 105 16.8 -18.4 260 21.3%
 camby,marcus den C +2.1 97 15.4 28.0 40 88.1%
 hilario,nene den PF -3.6 104 17.3 21.1 57 83.0%
 evans,reggie den PF -4.6 101 17.4 16.1 72 78.4%
 iverson,allen den SG/SF -0.7 108 13.7 14.3 80 76.0%
 diawara,yakhouba den SG/SF -3.6 110 16.2 -3.8 181 45.3%
 kleiza,linas den PF -0.6 108 16.6 -9.2 203 38.6%
 smith,j.r. den SG/SF +2.2 109 15.5 -10.7 211 36.2%
 blake,steve den PG +2.7 111 16.2 -11.7 219 33.7%
 najera,eduardo den PF +2.9 106 19.4 -15.9 252 23.7%
 anthony,carmelo den SG/SF +6.0 108 17.0 -18.6 261 21.0%
 maxiell,jason det PF -4.2 102 14.2 23.7 49 85.4%
 prince,tayshaun det SG/SF +2.4 107 12.2 20.0 59 82.4%
 wallace,rasheed det PF +3.2 100 16.9 18.3 67 79.9%
 mcdyess,antonio det PF -4.0 100 17.6 13.3 85 74.5%
 hamilton,richard det SG/SF -0.4 108 14.6 12.8 88 73.6%
 billups,chauncey det PG +2.6 106 15.7 12.0 92 72.3%
 delfino,carlos det SG/SF -4.3 104 14.7 11.1 98 70.5%
 webber,chris det PF +1.8 103 20.5 0.3 156 52.9%
 murray,ronald det SG/SF +0.4 107 16.2 -7.8 198 40.1%
 hunter,lindsey det PG +2.6 106 15.6 -12.5 228 31.0%
 mohammed,nazr det C +5.1 99 23.6 -15.7 249 24.6%
 davis,baron gsw PG -4.3 106 16.1 29.9 38 88.8%
 biedrins,andris gsw C -4.6 104 18.0 19.2 62 81.5%
 jackson,stephen gsw SG/SF -3.2 109 15.6 14.1 82 75.4%
 harrington,al gsw PF -0.4 108 17.0 7.5 123 62.9%
 richardson,jason gsw SG/SF -1.9 109 16.4 7.1 124 62.6%
 ellis,monta gsw SG/SF -0.9 109 15.8 2.1 145 56.2%
 pietrus,mickael gsw SG/SF +3.3 108 16.3 -11.4 218 34.0%
 barnes,matt gsw SG/SF +0.9 107 17.2 -12.6 230 30.4%
 jasikevicius,sar gsw PG +0.0 110 16.0 -16.9 256 22.5%
 azubuike,kelenna gsw SG/SF +4.7 109 19.0 -42.2 317 4.0%
 ming,yao hou C -2.1 98 11.9 50.1 7 98.2%
 wells,bonzi hou SG/SF -1.3 98 9.2 49.9 8 97.9%
 battier,shane hou SG/SF -3.7 102 13.4 44.6 12 96.7%
 hayes,chuck hou PF -9.1 98 18.7 44.3 13 96.4%
 mcgrady,tracy hou SG/SF +0.7 100 12.2 44.1 14 96.0%
 alston,rafer hou PG -4.2 102 15.8 42.1 16 95.4%
 mutombo,dikembe hou C -3.6 96 18.4 26.6 41 87.8%
 snyder,kirk hou SG/SF +4.4 102 13.9 -4.6 185 44.1%
 howard,juwan hou PF +8.2 103 16.8 -11.9 223 32.5%
 head,luther hou SG/SF +7.3 102 15.8 -13.8 237 28.3%
 o'neal,jermaine ind C -4.4 101 13.8 41.5 17 95.1%
 tinsley,jamaal ind PG -0.3 105 18.3 13.4 84 74.8%
 foster,jeff ind C -0.9 102 17.7 11.2 97 70.8%
 dunleavy,mike ind SG/SF +0.7 107 14.1 10.9 101 69.6%
 diogu,ike ind PF -3.7 106 13.8 9.6 109 67.2%
 granger,danny ind SG/SF +2.8 107 15.1 0.8 152 54.1%
 daniels,marquis ind SG/SF +0.1 108 14.5 -7.7 197 40.4%
 armstrong,darrel ind PG +0.5 105 18.0 -13.2 234 29.2%
 murphy,troy ind PF +4.9 106 20.0 -19.1 265 19.8%
 mcleod,keith ind PG +1.6 110 17.3 -22.6 279 15.5%
 williams,shawne ind SG/SF +8.9 109 19.8 -65.8 328 0.6%
 ewing,daniel lac PG -7.4 106 14.0 24.7 46 86.3%
 brand,elton lac PF +2.5 103 13.9 22.2 56 83.3%
 thomas,tim lac PF -5.2 106 17.6 10.6 102 69.3%
 maggette,corey lac SG/SF -0.6 106 14.7 10.4 103 69.0%
 mobley,cuttino lac SG/SF +0.8 108 14.8 7.8 122 63.2%
 cassell,sam lac PG -2.4 109 16.8 6.1 128 61.4%
 kaman,chris lac C +2.8 103 17.8 3.9 138 58.4%
 ross,quinton lac SG/SF +1.5 106 16.4 -0.7 162 51.1%
 livingston,shaun lac PG +5.8 107 17.6 -14.5 243 26.4%
 hart,jason lac PG +3.1 106 21.1 -19.6 266 19.5%
 bryant,kobe lal SG/SF -0.7 109 13.7 12.9 87 73.9%
 odom,lamar lal PF -2.8 107 17.0 12.4 91 72.6%
 farmar,jordan lal PG -5.1 110 14.1 6.4 127 61.7%
 walton,luke lal SG/SF -0.6 110 16.1 2.9 140 57.8%
 bynum,andrew lal C -1.7 106 20.1 -2.1 171 48.3%
 brown,kwame lal C +0.3 106 18.8 -3.7 180 45.6%
 parker,smush lal PG +5.2 110 17.8 -14.4 240 27.4%
 evans,maurice lal SG/SF +0.3 112 14.6 -16.3 253 23.4%
 turiaf,ronny lal PF +1.6 106 17.9 -23.4 284 14.0%
 cook,brian lal PF -0.8 108 21.6 -24.3 287 13.1%
 radmanovic,vladi lal PF +1.0 109 20.1 -28.7 300 9.1%
 vujacic,sasha lal SG/SF +4.3 110 16.3 -37.7 313 5.2%
 gay,rudy mem SG/SF -4.0 111 16.8 -0.8 163 50.8%
 stoudamire,damon mem PG -0.3 115 17.3 -11.8 220 33.4%
 miller,mike mem SG/SF +0.5 114 15.6 -12.7 231 30.1%
 harrington,junio mem PG -4.5 112 18.7 -14.4 241 27.1%
 gasol,pau mem PF +4.3 109 18.1 -15.7 248 24.9%
 roberts,lawrence mem C -2.5 110 22.5 -28.0 296 10.3%
 swift,stromile mem C +0.3 109 21.0 -28.0 298 9.7%
 johnson,alexande mem PF +1.5 108 20.6 -28.6 299 9.4%
 atkins,chucky mem PG +2.5 116 16.0 -30.1 304 7.9%
 warrick,hakim mem PF +3.1 113 19.5 -34.4 312 5.5%
 kinsey,tarance mem SG/SF +1.5 112 19.0 -39.3 316 4.3%
 jones,dahntay mem SG/SF +2.1 115 19.2 -47.5 322 2.4%
 jones,eddie mia SG/SF -3.7 108 12.7 30.2 37 89.1%
 wade,dwyane mia SG/SF +0.0 103 14.3 25.6 43 87.2%
 o'neal,shaquille mia C -1.2 104 15.0 25.4 44 86.9%
 williams,jason mia PG -0.4 109 13.9 22.5 53 84.2%
 mourning,alonzo mia C +0.6 102 15.0 16.6 71 78.7%
 haslem,udonis mia PF +0.2 105 18.2 9.2 111 66.6%
 posey,james mia SG/SF -0.9 104 16.8 2.2 144 56.5%
 wright,dorell mia SG/SF +2.2 102 16.1 1.6 147 55.6%
 walker,antoine mia PF -1.2 106 16.6 -0.4 160 51.7%
 kapono,jason mia SG/SF +1.3 109 17.3 -13.6 236 28.6%
 doleac,michael mia C +1.6 104 16.8 -19.6 267 19.1%
 payton,gary mia PG +4.1 108 18.9 -23.0 283 14.3%
 bogut,andrew mil C -4.6 110 17.7 7.9 120 63.8%
 redd,michael mil SG/SF -2.4 114 13.9 4.8 136 59.0%
 skinner,brian mil PF -1.7 109 17.6 2.4 142 57.1%
 boykins,earl mil PG +1.9 113 13.3 -0.7 161 51.4%
 williams,mo mil PG -1.5 112 18.6 -9.2 204 38.3%
 patterson,ruben mil SG/SF -1.7 111 17.7 -10.4 209 36.8%
 villanueva,charl mil PF -2.5 110 21.6 -22.3 277 16.1%
 bell,charlie mil SG/SF +0.3 114 18.3 -26.2 292 11.6%
 gadzuric,dan mil C -0.2 108 20.7 -30.7 307 7.0%
 ilyasova,ersan mil PF +1.6 111 22.5 -49.2 324 1.8%
 noel,david mil SG/SF +4.5 112 20.0 -65.5 327 0.9%
 garnett,kevin min PF -5.7 101 13.4 52.2 6 98.5%
 jaric,marko min SG/SF -1.3 107 15.6 -2.0 169 48.9%
 davis,ricky min SG/SF -0.4 110 16.5 -2.7 176 46.8%
 mccants,rashad min SG/SF -1.6 108 14.2 -6.0 191 42.2%
 smith,craig min PF -1.0 106 17.6 -11.3 215 35.0%
 blount,mark min C +3.8 108 18.5 -12.2 226 31.6%
 hassell,trenton min SG/SF +1.5 112 17.4 -14.9 244 26.1%
 hudson,troy min PG -1.7 111 17.5 -17.4 257 22.2%
 james,mike min PG +2.5 111 19.2 -18.7 262 20.7%
 foye,randy min SG/SF +1.5 109 16.7 -21.9 276 16.4%
 collins,jason njn C -7.5 107 19.1 24.9 45 86.6%
 kidd,jason njn PG +0.9 103 16.3 22.4 54 83.9%
 carter,vince njn SG/SF +1.0 107 13.6 15.8 75 77.5%
 krstic,nenad njn C -1.7 107 15.8 14.6 78 76.6%
 boone,josh njn PF -3.4 105 13.9 8.5 117 64.7%
 jefferson,richar njn SG/SF +1.4 109 14.1 7.9 121 63.5%
 wright,antoine njn SG/SF +0.1 107 15.9 -2.4 172 48.0%
 moore,mikki njn C +2.4 106 18.3 -7.1 194 41.3%
 nachbar,bostjan njn PF -1.0 106 16.7 -8.2 200 39.5%
 williams,marcus njn PG -2.4 109 18.0 -17.5 258 21.9%
 house,eddie njn SG/SF +6.4 108 14.6 -29.1 302 8.5%
 robinson,cliffor njn PF +7.4 108 18.8 -46.8 321 2.7%
 chandler,tyson nor C +0.6 103 15.5 17.2 70 79.0%
 armstrong,hilton nor C -6.0 106 12.7 15.2 76 77.2%
 pargo,jannero nor PG -5.7 108 15.6 11.1 99 70.2%
 butler,rasual nor SG/SF -3.8 108 16.0 8.7 113 66.0%
 jackson,bobby nor PG -2.6 107 14.9 8.7 114 65.7%
 paul,chris nor PG +6.8 106 15.9 -1.3 166 49.8%
 brown,devin nor SG/SF +0.0 108 17.8 -2.8 177 46.5%
 west,david nor PF +4.4 106 17.1 -3.9 182 45.0%
 mason,desmond nor SG/SF +2.5 109 17.2 -9.7 207 37.4%
 johnson,linton nor PF -4.4 103 20.8 -12.8 232 29.8%
 jackson,marc nor C +2.9 108 16.9 -14.4 242 26.7%
 simmons,cedric nor PF -0.9 107 19.0 -21.8 275 16.7%
 balkman,renaldo nyk SG/SF -9.2 102 14.5 30.9 36 89.4%
 lee,david nyk PF -2.6 105 15.8 11.9 94 71.7%
 frye,channing nyk PF -1.1 108 18.7 1.7 146 55.9%
 crawford,jamal nyk SG/SF +3.3 112 12.5 -2.8 178 46.2%
 collins,mardy nyk SG/SF -2.5 109 15.0 -3.5 179 45.9%
 richardson,quent nyk SG/SF +1.8 108 17.4 -6.0 190 42.6%
 francis,steve nyk SG/SF -0.8 109 18.2 -8.8 202 38.9%
 jeffries,jared nyk SG/SF +3.0 108 18.8 -15.8 250 24.3%
 curry,eddy nyk C +5.3 110 16.3 -15.8 251 24.0%
 robinson,nate nyk PG -2.4 110 18.0 -16.6 255 22.8%
 marbury,stephon nyk PG +5.4 112 16.4 -18.1 259 21.6%
 rose,malik nyk PF +1.3 107 21.8 -43.0 318 3.6%
 howard,dwight orl C +0.7 99 12.0 37.3 24 93.0%
 battie,tony orl PF -4.1 104 17.5 32.2 32 90.6%
 ariza,trevor orl SG/SF -4.2 103 14.6 20.2 58 82.7%
 hill,grant orl SG/SF +0.3 106 15.9 13.2 86 74.2%
 turkoglu,hedo orl SG/SF -0.6 105 17.1 12.5 90 72.9%
 arroyo,carlos orl PG -3.1 107 14.8 9.1 112 66.3%
 milicic,darko orl C +0.6 101 14.9 8.6 115 65.3%
 nelson,jameer orl PG +2.9 107 18.3 -1.1 165 50.2%
 dooling,keyon orl SG/SF +3.5 107 12.0 -2.1 170 48.6%
 bogans,keith orl SG/SF -0.3 107 17.1 -9.7 206 37.7%
 redick,j.j. orl SG/SF +3.2 108 16.3 -30.5 306 7.3%
 dalembert,samuel phi C -1.8 103 16.7 22.2 55 83.6%
 williams,louis phi PG -6.4 109 12.2 19.8 61 81.8%
 ollie,kevin phi PG +1.8 110 12.4 11.4 96 71.1%
 miller,andre phi PG +1.6 108 15.6 8.5 116 65.0%
 smith,joe phi PF +1.5 105 14.0 5.5 133 59.9%
 iguodala,andre phi SG/SF +1.8 105 16.5 2.5 141 57.4%
 hunter,steven phi C +0.4 107 16.5 0.5 155 53.2%
 carney,rodney phi SG/SF +1.8 108 17.4 -11.9 221 33.1%
 green,willie phi SG/SF +4.0 110 16.5 -20.7 272 17.6%
 korver,kyle phi SG/SF +2.6 109 17.9 -31.1 308 6.7%
 marion,shawn pho SG/SF -0.5 100 16.1 26.3 42 87.5%
 bell,raja pho SG/SF -3.6 110 15.5 11.5 95 71.4%
 thomas,kurt pho C -4.9 103 17.2 9.4 110 66.9%
 stoudemire,amare pho C +2.8 103 17.3 4.9 134 59.6%
 nash,steve pho PG +0.9 110 16.2 2.9 139 58.1%
 jones,james pho SG/SF -3.6 108 14.9 0.9 151 54.4%
 barbosa,leandro pho SG/SF +0.5 108 14.5 -0.4 159 52.0%
 diaw,boris pho PF +2.5 109 16.6 -4.3 184 44.4%
 banks,marcus pho PG +6.0 108 21.8 -60.3 326 1.2%
 przybilla,joel por C -8.4 106 13.4 55.6 4 99.1%
 randolph,zach por PF +1.7 109 15.0 5.5 132 60.2%
 magloire,jamaal por C +0.2 108 14.9 -4.8 186 43.8%
 udoka,ime por SG/SF -1.7 111 18.3 -5.0 187 43.5%
 aldridge,lamarcu por C -1.4 109 17.1 -8.4 201 39.2%
 jack,jarrett por PG +2.3 112 17.4 -11.9 222 32.8%
 outlaw,travis por PF -0.2 108 17.7 -18.7 263 20.4%
 rodriguez,sergio por PG +0.6 111 15.7 -22.4 278 15.8%
 roy,brandon por SG/SF +4.0 111 18.1 -25.2 289 12.5%
 jones,fred por SG/SF +3.2 108 17.2 -25.8 291 11.9%
 webster,martell por SG/SF -0.6 112 18.5 -28.0 297 10.0%
 artest,ron sac SG/SF -1.5 105 15.1 19.9 60 82.1%
 miller,brad sac C -4.7 107 17.1 18.8 65 80.5%
 thomas,kenny sac PF +1.5 107 18.3 1.4 149 55.0%
 bibby,mike sac PG -0.1 110 18.0 -2.6 175 47.1%
 williamson,corli sac PF -6.4 110 17.5 -7.1 195 41.0%
 price,ronnie sac PG +1.3 107 15.2 -11.3 216 34.7%
 garcia,francisco sac SG/SF -3.1 108 17.3 -14.0 238 28.0%
 martin,kevin sac SG/SF +5.5 109 16.5 -15.2 245 25.8%
 abdur-rahim,shar sac PF +3.5 108 18.2 -15.6 246 25.5%
 salmons,john sac SG/SF +2.8 109 15.5 -15.7 247 25.2%
 duncan,tim san C -6.5 94 13.6 65.6 1 100.0%
 bowen,bruce san SG/SF -9.6 103 13.7 61.5 2 99.7%
 ginobili,manu san SG/SF -4.7 98 11.7 60.4 3 99.4%
 parker,tony san PG -1.2 102 13.7 47.5 9 97.6%
 horry,robert san PF -4.0 98 16.7 23.4 51 84.8%
 barry,brent san SG/SF +5.8 102 12.9 10.9 100 69.9%
 elson,francisco san C +0.3 97 20.6 10.2 105 68.4%
 vaughn,jacque san PG -3.3 102 18.3 3.9 137 58.7%
 oberto,fabricio san C +3.0 100 17.6 0.6 154 53.5%
 bonner,matt san PF +5.7 100 13.1 -0.2 158 52.3%
 udrih,beno san PG +5.2 103 14.6 -5.8 189 42.9%
 finley,michael san SG/SF +7.3 103 15.2 -13.3 235 28.9%
 lewis,rashard sea SG/SF -1.1 110 16.1 0.2 157 52.6%
 allen,ray sea SG/SF +1.3 112 14.4 -4.1 183 44.7%
 collison,nick sea PF -3.2 109 20.4 -6.9 192 41.9%
 ridnour,luke sea PG +0.8 112 17.8 -11.0 214 35.3%
 watson,earl sea PG +1.0 111 16.2 -11.4 217 34.3%
 wilcox,chris sea PF +1.5 109 20.7 -16.3 254 23.1%
 wilks,mike sea PG -3.8 113 16.9 -19.8 268 18.8%
 gelabale,mickael sea SG/SF -1.7 113 16.2 -20.8 274 17.0%
 wilkins,damien sea SG/SF +3.5 111 16.5 -24.9 288 12.8%
 petro,johan sea C +0.5 108 22.6 -38.0 314 4.9%
 garbajosa,jorge tor PF -5.0 105 14.7 39.0 21 93.9%
 parker,anthony tor SG/SF -7.1 108 14.3 35.6 26 92.4%
 nesterovic,rasho tor C -6.0 104 16.9 35.0 27 92.1%
 bosh,chris tor PF -1.7 104 15.5 24.4 47 86.0%
 ford,t.j. tor PG -2.3 106 17.8 18.3 66 80.2%
 calderon,jose tor PG +2.8 108 15.8 -12.1 224 32.2%
 bargnani,andrea tor PF +1.9 106 16.5 -12.6 229 30.7%
 graham,joey tor SG/SF -0.5 107 19.5 -22.9 281 14.9%
 peterson,morris tor SG/SF +4.4 106 17.0 -23.4 286 13.4%
 dixon,juan tor SG/SF -0.3 110 18.4 -30.1 305 7.6%
 humphries,kris tor PF +5.1 105 19.5 -38.8 315 4.6%
 kirilenko,andrei uta SG/SF +2.1 103 11.7 39.1 20 94.2%
 boozer,carlos uta PF +2.7 104 15.6 14.1 81 75.7%
 millsap,paul uta PF -3.7 102 16.4 10.2 106 68.1%
 giricek,gordan uta SG/SF -5.4 110 13.3 9.6 108 67.5%
 brewer,ronnie uta SG/SF -0.9 107 14.5 2.3 143 56.8%
 collins,jarron uta C -8.9 110 17.1 -1.0 164 50.5%
 fisher,derek uta SG/SF -1.9 109 17.7 -1.6 167 49.5%
 williams,deron uta PG +4.6 110 16.5 -10.2 208 37.1%
 harpring,matt uta SG/SF +0.6 108 15.1 -10.8 212 35.9%
 okur,mehmet uta C +10.1 108 18.5 -31.3 309 6.4%
 haywood,brendan was C -6.6 109 16.8 16.1 73 78.1%
 butler,caron was SG/SF -1.5 109 17.2 -1.8 168 49.2%
 stevenson,deshaw was SG/SF +2.5 114 14.7 -7.1 193 41.6%
 arenas,gilbert was PG -2.1 111 19.3 -10.6 210 36.5%
 thomas,etan was C +1.6 107 20.3 -19.1 264 20.1%
 daniels,antonio was SG/SF +0.5 114 13.9 -19.9 269 18.5%
 jamison,antawn was PF +3.9 110 18.5 -20.2 270 18.2%
 songaila,darius was PF -1.6 111 16.9 -20.7 271 17.9%
 blatche,andray was PF -0.2 108 20.9 -29.0 301 8.8%
 hayes,jarvis was SG/SF +5.6 112 19.9 -56.8 325 1.5%

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright © 2007 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved